Policy presence
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Thessaloniki, Greece
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki is listed as QS 2026 rank =485. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki is listed as QS 2026 rank =485. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Aristotle University of Thessaloniki as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/aristotle-university-of-thessaloniki.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki has 4 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Source Status
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki has an official Greek GenAI guidance document for the AUTH academic community, first edition November 2025, covering general principles and teaching/student guidelines.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: central_genai_guidance_found
Original evidence
Evidence 1Το παρόν έγγραφο απευθύνεται στο διδακτικό, ερευνητικό και διοικητικό προσωπικό του ιδρύματος καθώς και στους/στις φοιτητές/τριές του.
Localized display only
The document is addressed to the institution's teaching, research and administrative staff, as well as its students.
Privacy
AUTH's GenAI principles advise users not to enter institutional, copyrighted, confidential, personal, or sensitive data into GenAI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: do_not_enter_confidential_personal_or_sensitive_data
Original evidence
Evidence 1Οι χρήστες της GenAI θα πρέπει να μην εισάγουν στα εργαλεία που χρησιμοποιούν δεδομένα του ιδρύματος, δεδομένα που υπόκεινται σε πνευματικά δικαιώματα και άλλα εμπιστευτικά, προσωπικά ή ευαίσθητα δεδομένα.
Localized display only
GenAI users should not enter institutional data, copyrighted data, or other confidential, personal or sensitive data into the tools they use.
Academic Integrity
AUTH's GenAI principles say use by members of the academic community should align with existing internal regulations, preserve academic integrity, and be explicitly declared when requested.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_use_subject_to_academic_integrity_and_disclosure
Original evidence
Evidence 1Η χρήση της GenAI από τα μέλη της ακαδημαϊκής κοινότητας θα πρέπει να είναι σύμφωνη με τους υφιστάμενους εσωτερικούς Κανονισμούς Λειτουργίας, Ηθικής και Δεοντολογίας του ΑΠΘ.
Localized display only
Use of GenAI by members of the academic community should comply with AUTH's existing internal operating, ethics and conduct regulations.
Teaching
AUTH guidance encourages teaching staff to state clearly the GenAI-use policy adopted for a course, include it in the course outline, and modify it by assignment when needed.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: course_level_genai_policy_disclosure_encouraged
Original evidence
Evidence 1Το διδακτικό προσωπικό προτρέπεται να διατυπώνει με σαφήνεια την πολιτική χρήσης της GenAI που υιοθετεί στο πλαίσιο ενός ακαδημαϊκού μαθήματος και να την ενσωματώνει στο Περίγραμμα του μαθήματος.
Localized display only
Teaching staff are encouraged to state clearly the GenAI-use policy adopted for an academic course and include it in the course outline.
Ai Tool Treatment
AUTH student guidance says course teams define the GenAI policy for each course or assignment, and examples distinguish potentially permitted learning-support uses from uses such as submitting generated content as-is or using GenAI during an exam.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: student_ai_use_depends_on_course_policy_with_examples
Original evidence
Evidence 1Η διδακτική ομάδα κάθε μαθήματος ορίζει τη GenAI πολιτική που θα πρέπει να ακολουθείτε στο μάθημα που παρακολουθείτε ή στην εργασία που συμμετέχετε, οπότε βάσει αυτής της πολιτικής μια χρήση που αναφέρεται στον παρακάτω πίνακα μπορεί να είναι πράγματι επιτρεπόμενη ή όχι.
Localized display only
The teaching team for each course defines the GenAI policy students should follow in the course or assignment, so a listed use may actually be permitted or not depending on that policy.
Ai Tool Treatment
AUTH Library's academic-writing AI tools page frames AI tools as assistants for search, analysis, and writing, while advising responsible use, source verification, academic-integrity respect, disclosure when required, and avoidance of confidential data uploads.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: library_ai_tools_as_assistants_with_responsible_use_warnings
Original evidence
Evidence 1Χρησιμοποίησε τα εργαλεία AI ως βοηθήματα για αναζήτηση, ανάλυση και συγγραφή, αλλά πάντα με υπευθυνότητα και σεβασμό στην ακαδημαϊκή ακεραιότητα.
Localized display only
Use AI tools as aids for search, analysis and writing, but always responsibly and with respect for academic integrity.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
Γενικές Αρχές και Κατευθυντήριες Γραμμές για τη Χρήση της Παραγωγικής Τεχνητής Νοημοσύνης από την Ακαδημαϊκή Κοινότητα ΑΠΘ
it.auth.gr
Τεχνητή Νοημοσύνη (AI) στην Ακαδημαϊκή Έρευνα & Συγγραφή
lib.auth.gr
Τεχνητή Νοημοσύνη (AI): Πολιτικές και εργαλεία
lib.auth.gr
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.