Heraklion, Greece

University of Crete

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage2 reviewedEvidence-backed claims2Reviewed2Candidate0Official sources2Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-crete.json

Policy profile

Coverage score60/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence77%

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coursework

University of Crete has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.

Conditionally AllowedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

University of Crete has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

2 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

Official University of Crete ethics pages state that, if a course instructor has not given a clear statement, use of or consultation with generative AI is treated analogously to assistance from another person, and using generative AI tools to substantially complete an assignment or exam is not permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: no_instructor_statement_generai_treated_as_person_assistance_substantial_completion_not_permitted

Original evidence

Evidence 1
If there is no clear statement from a course instructor, the use of or consultation with generative AI shall be treated analogously to assistance from another person.

Original evidence

Evidence 2
using generative AI tools to substantially complete an assignment or exam (e.g. by entering exam or assignment questions) is not permitted.

Teaching

Official University of Crete ethics pages state that individual course instructors may set their own policies regulating generative AI tools in their courses, including allowing or disallowing some or all uses, and should communicate those policies to students in course syllabi.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: course_instructors_may_set_generai_course_policies_and_should_communicate_in_syllabi

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Individual course instructors are free to set their own policy regulating the use of generative AI tools in their courses, including allowing or disallowing some or all uses of such tools.

Original evidence

Evidence 2
Course instructors should set such policies in their course syllabi and clearly communicate such policies to students.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

2 source attribution

Code of Ethics - School of Medicine, University of Crete

med.uoc.gr

Snapshot hash
e796d4445dd2a5055f88322d3148870cac3bc5849d1ce40477232ced728d9aea

Change log

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities