Heraklion, Greece

University of Crete

University of Crete has 2 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 2 reviewed claims. Last checked May 17, 2026.

University of Crete AI policy short answer

v1 public contract

University of Crete has 2 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions, including 2 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 17, 2026. Discovery context: University of Crete is listed as QS 2026 rank =628.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Crete as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 17, 2026 and last changed on May 17, 2026. The record contains 2 source-backed claims, including 2 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-crete.json. The entity-level confidence is 90%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage2 reviewedSource languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-crete.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes Teaching claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims2Reviewed2Candidate0Official sources2

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score60/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence77%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coursework

University of Crete has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.

Conditionally AllowedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

University of Crete has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

2 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

Official University of Crete ethics pages state that, if a course instructor has not given a clear statement, use of or consultation with generative AI is treated analogously to assistance from another person, and using generative AI tools to substantially complete an assignment or exam is not permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: no_instructor_statement_generai_treated_as_person_assistance_substantial_completion_not_permitted

Original evidence

Evidence 1
If there is no clear statement from a course instructor, the use of or consultation with generative AI shall be treated analogously to assistance from another person.

Original evidence

Evidence 2
using generative AI tools to substantially complete an assignment or exam (e.g. by entering exam or assignment questions) is not permitted.

Teaching

Official University of Crete ethics pages state that individual course instructors may set their own policies regulating generative AI tools in their courses, including allowing or disallowing some or all uses, and should communicate those policies to students in course syllabi.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: course_instructors_may_set_generai_course_policies_and_should_communicate_in_syllabi

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Individual course instructors are free to set their own policy regulating the use of generative AI tools in their courses, including allowing or disallowing some or all uses of such tools.

Original evidence

Evidence 2
Course instructors should set such policies in their course syllabi and clearly communicate such policies to students.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

2 source attribution

Code of Ethics - School of Medicine, University of Crete

med.uoc.gr

Snapshot hash
e796d4445dd2a5055f88322d3148870cac3bc5849d1ce40477232ced728d9aea

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities