Policy presence
University of Zilina has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Zilina, Slovakia
University of Zilina
University of Zilina has 7 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 7 reviewed claims. Last checked May 26, 2026.
University of Zilina AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
University of Zilina has 7 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions, including 7 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 26, 2026. Discovery context: University of Zilina is listed as QS 2026 rank 1001-1200.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Zilina as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 26, 2026 and last changed on May 26, 2026. The record contains 7 source-backed claims, including 7 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-zilina.json. The entity-level confidence is 98%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- Evidence includes Research claims.
- Evidence includes Security review claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of Zilina has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
University of Zilina has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of Zilina has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of Zilina has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of Zilina has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
University of Zilina has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
University of Zilina has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
University of Zilina has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of Zilina has 3 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
University of Zilina has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
University of Zilina prohibits employees and students from entering sensitive data into publicly available GenAI tools, including non-public university data, non-public study materials, test assignments, intellectual-property-protected materials, personal data without explicit written consent, preliminary research results, and trade-secret data of partners.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Sensitive data must not be entered into publicly available GenAI tools.
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1Zamestnanci a študenti UNIZA majú zákaz vkladať do verejne dostupných nástrojov GenAI citlivé údaje, medzi ktoré patria napr. neverejné údaje univerzity, neverejné študijné materiály, zadania testov, materiály podliehajúce ochrane duševného vlastníctva, osobné údaje akýchkoľvek osôb bez ich výslovného písomného súhlasu, predbežné výsledky výskumu ... alebo údaje podliehajúce obchodnému tajomstvu zmluvných partnerov.
Widok lokalny only
Employees and students are prohibited from entering sensitive data into publicly available GenAI tools, including non-public university/study materials, test assignments, protected IP, personal data without written consent, preliminary research, or trade secrets.
Academic Integrity
For seminar, semester, and final theses, University of Zilina students must clearly state whether and to what extent they used GenAI tools, including the tool name/version, a brief use description, and prompts in an appendix.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Student GenAI use in seminar, semester, and final works must be disclosed with tool/version, use description, and prompts.
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1Pri vypracovaní seminárnych, semestrálnych a záverečných prác je študent povinný jasne uviesť, či a v akom rozsahu využil nástroje GenAI. V prípade použitia nástrojov GenAI je potrebné uviesť názov nástroja a použitú verziu ... stručný popis, na čo bol nástroj použitý ... a v prílohe uviesť použité dopyty (prompty).
Widok lokalny only
For seminar, semester, and final works, students must clearly state whether and how much they used GenAI, identify the tool/version and use, and include prompts in an appendix.
Academic Integrity
University of Zilina prohibits students from submitting work generated by GenAI in substantial or full scope without their own creative contribution, and requires students to respect instructor restrictions on GenAI use in a course.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Substantial/full GenAI-generated student work without the student's own creative contribution is prohibited; instructor course limits must be respected.
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1Je neprípustné, aby študent vypracoval a odovzdal prácu, ktorá bola v podstatnom rozsahu (v rozsahu ucelených kapitol) alebo celom rozsahu vygenerovaná nástrojmi GenAI bez vlastného tvorivého vkladu študenta. ... V prípade, ak vyučujúci v rámci predmetu nepovolí použitie nástrojov GenAI alebo ich použitie obmedzí, študent je povinný tieto pokyny rešpektovať.
Widok lokalny only
The order says a student may not submit substantial/full GenAI-generated work without their own creative contribution, and must respect course instructor restrictions.
Academic Integrity
University of Zilina treats undisclosed GenAI use, false information about the extent of GenAI use, and generated references to non-existent literature as disciplinary offenses or ethical-rule violations under its student disciplinary order and ethical code.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Undisclosed GenAI use, false disclosure, and generated non-existent references are disciplinary or ethical violations.
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1Za disciplinárny priestupok podľa Smernice č. 201 ... a porušenie etických pravidiel podľa Smernice č. 207 ... sa považuje najmä: a. nepriznané použitie nástrojov GenAI (tzv. plagiátorstvo / AI plagiátorstvo), b. nepravdivé informácie o rozsahu použitia nástrojov GenAI, c. predloženie vygenerovaných referencií na neexistujúcu literatúru.
Widok lokalny only
The order lists undisclosed GenAI use, false information about extent of GenAI use, and generated references to non-existent literature as disciplinary or ethical violations.
Source Status
University of Zilina has a university-wide Rector's Order No. 1/2026 that introduces rules for ethical, safe, and transparent use of generative AI by employees and students in education, research, and administrative activities.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Rector's Order No. 1/2026 applies to GenAI use by UNIZA employees and students in education, research, and administration.
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1Účelom vydania tohto príkazu rektora je oboznámenie všetkých zamestnancov a študentov Žilinskej univerzity v Žiline (ďalej len „UNIZA“) s pravidlami súvisiacimi s etickým, bezpečným a transparentným používaním nástrojov generatívnej umelej inteligencie (ďalej len „GenAI“) vo vzdelávaní, vedecko-výskumnej činnosti a administratívnych činnostiach v prostredí UNIZA.
Widok lokalny only
The rector order says its purpose is to inform all UNIZA employees and students about rules for ethical, safe, and transparent GenAI use in education, research, and administrative activities.
Research
For research outputs, University of Zilina says GenAI tools may not be listed as an author or co-author unless the publisher requires it, and GenAI use for data generation, visualizations, translation, or statistical processing must be explicitly stated in the methodology or acknowledgements.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: GenAI is not to be listed as research author/co-author unless publisher-required; specified research uses must be disclosed in methodology or acknowledgements.
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1Pri výstupoch vedecko-výskumnej činnosti nie je povolené uvádzať, ak to samotné vydavateľstvo nepožaduje, nástroje GenAI ako autora alebo spoluautora vedeckého výstupu ... V prípade, ak boli nástroje GenAI použité pri generovaní údajov, vizualizáciách, preklade alebo pri štatistickom spracovaní výsledkov, musí to byť explicitne uvedené v časti, kde je popisovaná metodika alebo v časti „Poďakovanie“.
Widok lokalny only
For research outputs, GenAI tools are not listed as authors unless the publisher requires it, and specified GenAI uses must be disclosed in methodology or acknowledgements.
Security Review
If University of Zilina provides paid licenses for GenAI tools, employees and students are directed to prefer them over unverified free tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Paid UNIZA-provided GenAI licenses should be preferred over unverified free tools when available.
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1V prípade, ak UNIZA poskytuje platené licencie pre nástroje GenAI, je potrebné ich uprednostniť pred neoverenými bezplatnými nástrojmi.
Widok lokalny only
If UNIZA provides paid licenses for GenAI tools, they should be preferred over unverified free tools.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
2 source attribution
Príkaz rektora č. 1/2026 o používaní nástrojov generatívnej umelej inteligencie na UNIZA
uniza.sk
PRÍKAZ REKTORA č. 1/2026 o používaní nástrojov generatívnej umelej inteligencie na Žilinskej univerzite v Žiline
uniza.sk
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.