Coursework & assignments
Conditional
DLSU requires each course syllabus to state generative-AI use levels, while prohibited use or failure to disclose can be academic dishonesty.
Reviewed evidence & official sources
Reviewed evidence
Starting Term 1, 2025-2026, DLSU's policy says every course must include a dedicated Generative AI Use Policy section in the syllabus, including usage policy levels for grading components and a concise rationale.
Sprawdzone przez agentaStarting Term 1, 2025-2026, every course must include an explicit declaration of AI usage policies in a dedicated section of the syllabus with the heading Generative AI Use Policy.
DLSU's policy treats prohibited generative AI use and failure to disclose generative AI use as generative AI-related academic dishonesty, while also stating that AI detector results cannot be the sole basis for establishing such dishonesty.
Sprawdzone przez agentaFor students, the following shall be considered as generative AI-related academic dishonesty: Using generative AI in producing a submission in a way that is prohibited by the usage policy defined for that assessment, even if it was disclosed; Failing to properly disclose the use of generative AI in a submission.
Faculty can use AI detector tools (Turnitin, GPTZero, etc.) for flagging suspicious submissions. However, results of such tools cannot be used as the sole basis for establishing generative AI-related academic dishonesty, as these tools can produce both false positives and false negatives.