University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Język
ENZHFRPL

Adelaide, Australia

Adelaide University

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: =82Updated19 lip 2026

Reviewed policy snapshot

Adelaide University sets assessment, exam, privacy, and research conditions for generative AI, with course and exam instructions remaining important.

Do

  • Follow the course coordinator's assessment instructions for generative AI.
  • Read the permitted-tools section of the exam instructions.
  • Acknowledge AI-generated information as required for the assessment.

Don't

  • Do not submit AI-produced work as your own or use it without required acknowledgement.
  • Do not use ChatGPT or another AI tool in an invigilated online exam unless explicitly approved.
  • Do not submit AI-produced work as your own without acknowledgement.

Audience

For students · Coursework, exams, and disclosure

Reviewed material is available for this audience.

Coursework & assignments

Conditional

Adelaide says course coordinators inform students about appropriate generative-AI use, while inappropriate use that subverts an assignment can be academic misconduct.

Scope: Mixed scopeAssignment
Reviewed evidence & official sources

Reviewed evidence

Adelaide University's Academic Integrity Policy treats inappropriate use of AI that subverts an assignment or gives unfair academic advantage as an example of academic misconduct, including submitting AI-produced work as the student's own or using AI-generated information without acknowledgement.
Sprawdzone przez agenta
Inappropriate use of artificial intelligence (AI) - is to subvert the aims of assignment or give the student an unfair academic advantage. Inappropriate use of AI can include but is not limited to: submitting work produced (or produced in part) by generative artificial intelligence as the student's own work; using information generated by artificial intelligence without acknowledgement or attribution.
For Adelaide University coursework assessment, the Assessment Procedure states that course coordinators will ensure students are informed about appropriate use of generative AI and similar tools in the course.
Sprawdzone przez agenta
The [Course Coordinator] will ensure students are informed about the standards associated with evidence-based academic writing, the appropriate use of generative artificial intelligence and similar tools, and relevant scholarly and/or professional conventions that apply to assessment in the course.

Exams & assessment

Restricted

Adelaide's invigilated online exam rules allow only tools explicitly approved in the exam instructions and list AI tools such as ChatGPT as not permitted.

Scope: Mixed scopeExam
Reviewed evidence & official sources

Reviewed evidence

Adelaide University's invigilated online exam rules state that students may use only tools, software, or materials explicitly approved in exam instructions, and list AI tools such as ChatGPT as not permitted.
Sprawdzone przez agenta
Note: Anything not listed is prohibited. Use only tools, software, or materials explicitly approved in your exam instructions. This includes: No collaboration tools (email, forums, etc.); No additional electronic devices; No AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT); No physical items (pens, paper, calculators).

Disclosure & citation

Required

Adelaide treats submitting AI-produced work as one's own or using AI-generated information without acknowledgement as an example of academic misconduct.

Scope: Mixed scopeAssignmentExamThesisResearch
Reviewed evidence & official sources

Reviewed evidence

Adelaide University's Academic Integrity Policy treats inappropriate use of AI that subverts an assignment or gives unfair academic advantage as an example of academic misconduct, including submitting AI-produced work as the student's own or using AI-generated information without acknowledgement.
Sprawdzone przez agenta
Inappropriate use of artificial intelligence (AI) - is to subvert the aims of assignment or give the student an unfair academic advantage. Inappropriate use of AI can include but is not limited to: submitting work produced (or produced in part) by generative artificial intelligence as the student's own work; using information generated by artificial intelligence without acknowledgement or attribution.

Privacy & sensitive data

Restricted

Adelaide graduate-research guidance says not to upload sensitive, copyrighted, confidential, or unprotected intellectual property into AI tools.

Scope: Mixed scopeAssignmentExamThesisResearch
Reviewed evidence & official sources

Reviewed evidence

Adelaide University's Graduate Research School guidance tells graduate research students not to upload sensitive, copyrighted, or confidential information, or unprotected intellectual property, into AI tools.
Sprawdzone przez agenta
You must not: generate thesis content using AI (unless quoted and cited); translate large portions of text using AI; upload sensitive, copyrighted or confidential information into AI tools; upload unprotected intellectual property into AI tools.

University-provided AI tools

Allowed in this scope

Adelaide lists Microsoft Copilot as an officially endorsed university-account tool, but tool access does not itself grant assessment permission.

Scope: Mixed scopeProvision ≠ coursework permission
Reviewed evidence & official sources

Reviewed evidence

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Adelaide University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Sprawdzone przez agenta
Adelaide University's Library guide says Microsoft Copilot is available through a university account, follows university data-security guidelines, and is the recommended starting point for common academic tasks.

Research & publication

Required

Adelaide graduate-research guidance requires transparent, responsible AI use with records and acknowledgement, and its authorship procedure requires disclosure and no AI authorship.

Scope: Mixed scopeThesisResearch
Reviewed evidence & official sources

Reviewed evidence

Adelaide University's Authorship Procedure states that generative AI can be used to improve readability and clarity in publications, but must not be considered or listed as an author and its use must be disclosed transparently.
Sprawdzone przez agenta
Generative AI can be used in publications to improve the readability and clarity of written content by assisting authors with generating drafts, revising language, and suggesting phrasing. Generative AI must not be considered an author itself, and its use must be disclosed transparently.
Adelaide University's Graduate Research School guidance says graduate research students' use of generative AI must be transparent and responsible, including discussing use with a supervisor, keeping records, and acknowledging AI use in thesis acknowledgements, presentations, and publications.
Sprawdzone przez agenta
Generative AI tools generate new content such as text or images based on prompts from the user. These tools can support your research, but their use must be transparent and responsible. You must: discuss AI use with your supervisor; keep records of programs or applications used, dates and prompts; include an AI use statement in your thesis acknowledgements; acknowledge AI use in presentations and publications.

Reviewed record

Zrecenzowane twierdzenia

9 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Adelaide University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność97%

Wartość znormalizowana: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"University-account Copilot that follows Adelaide University's data-security guidance.","howToObtain":"Sign in to Microsoft Copilot with the University account.","costToUser":"Not stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Ostatnio sprawdzono
15 lip 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
15 lip 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Adelaide University's Library guide says Microsoft Copilot is available through a university account, follows university data-security guidelines, and is the recommended starting point for common academic tasks.

Widok lokalny only

Adelaide University's Library guide says Microsoft Copilot is available through a university account, follows university data-security guidelines, and is the recommended starting point for common academic tasks.

Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
18ae051d…
Pobrano
15 lip 2026

Academic Integrity

Adelaide University's Academic Integrity Policy treats inappropriate use of AI that subverts an assignment or gives unfair academic advantage as an example of academic misconduct, including submitting AI-produced work as the student's own or using AI-generated information without acknowledgement.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność95%

Wartość znormalizowana: inappropriate_ai_use_academic_misconduct

Ostatnio sprawdzono
13 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
13 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Inappropriate use of artificial intelligence (AI) - is to subvert the aims of assignment or give the student an unfair academic advantage. Inappropriate use of AI can include but is not limited to: submitting work produced (or produced in part) by generative artificial intelligence as the student's own work; using information generated by artificial intelligence without acknowledgement or attribution.
Język źródła
English (en-AU)
Skrót migawki
dab45838…
Pobrano
13 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Definitions used in our policy - Academic Misconduct

Badania

Adelaide University's Authorship Procedure states that generative AI can be used to improve readability and clarity in publications, but must not be considered or listed as an author and its use must be disclosed transparently.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność95%

Wartość znormalizowana: research_outputs_genai_not_author_disclose_use

Ostatnio sprawdzono
13 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
13 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Generative AI can be used in publications to improve the readability and clarity of written content by assisting authors with generating drafts, revising language, and suggesting phrasing. Generative AI must not be considered an author itself, and its use must be disclosed transparently.
Język źródła
English (en-AU)
Skrót migawki
51693b3d…
Pobrano
13 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Section 3.2 - Generative Artificial Intelligence

Ai Tool Treatment

Adelaide University's invigilated online exam rules state that students may use only tools, software, or materials explicitly approved in exam instructions, and list AI tools such as ChatGPT as not permitted.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność94%

Wartość znormalizowana: online_exam_no_ai_tools_unless_explicitly_approved

Ostatnio sprawdzono
13 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
13 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Note: Anything not listed is prohibited. Use only tools, software, or materials explicitly approved in your exam instructions. This includes: No collaboration tools (email, forums, etc.); No additional electronic devices; No AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT); No physical items (pens, paper, calculators).
Język źródła
English (en-AU)
Skrót migawki
9c5d5891…
Pobrano
13 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Approved tools only

Badania

Adelaide University's Graduate Research School guidance says graduate research students' use of generative AI must be transparent and responsible, including discussing use with a supervisor, keeping records, and acknowledging AI use in thesis acknowledgements, presentations, and publications.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność94%

Wartość znormalizowana: graduate_research_genai_transparent_responsible_records_acknowledgement

Ostatnio sprawdzono
13 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
13 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Generative AI tools generate new content such as text or images based on prompts from the user. These tools can support your research, but their use must be transparent and responsible. You must: discuss AI use with your supervisor; keep records of programs or applications used, dates and prompts; include an AI use statement in your thesis acknowledgements; acknowledge AI use in presentations and publications.
Język źródła
English (en-AU)
Skrót migawki
38e94448…
Pobrano
13 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Using generative AI

Prywatność

Adelaide University's Graduate Research School guidance tells graduate research students not to upload sensitive, copyrighted, or confidential information, or unprotected intellectual property, into AI tools.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność94%

Wartość znormalizowana: graduate_research_no_sensitive_copyright_confidential_ip_uploads_to_ai

Ostatnio sprawdzono
13 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
13 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
You must not: generate thesis content using AI (unless quoted and cited); translate large portions of text using AI; upload sensitive, copyrighted or confidential information into AI tools; upload unprotected intellectual property into AI tools.
Język źródła
English (en-AU)
Skrót migawki
38e94448…
Pobrano
13 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Using generative AI

Academic Integrity

Adelaide University's Academic Misconduct Procedure lists inappropriate use of Artificial Intelligence with plagiarism in its outcome table, with a standard outcome of mark reduction up to and including zero for the assignment.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność93%

Wartość znormalizowana: ai_misconduct_outcome_assignment_mark_reduction

Ostatnio sprawdzono
13 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
13 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Type of academic misconduct: Plagiarism; Inappropriate use of Artificial Intelligence. Standard Outcome: Reduction of mark up to and including zero for the assignment. Mitigated outcome: a warning; submission of a corrected version of the affected component for a maximum of 50% for assignment; a reduction of mark. Exacerbated outcome: zero for assignment; zero for course.
Język źródła
English (en-AU)
Skrót migawki
4b29ea26…
Pobrano
13 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Section 13 - outcome table

Security Review

Adelaide University's Cyber Security Policy states that AI systems are part of its digital environment and are subject to the same cyber security, data protection, and compliance requirements as other information systems.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność93%

Wartość znormalizowana: ai_systems_same_cyber_data_compliance_requirements

Ostatnio sprawdzono
13 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
13 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Adelaide University recognises that artificial intelligence (AI) systems form part of its digital environment and are subject to the same cyber security, data protection, and compliance requirements as other information systems.
Język źródła
English (en-AU)
Skrót migawki
945cf29f…
Pobrano
13 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Section 3.2 - We apply secure and responsible practices to AI systems and data

Nauczanie

For Adelaide University coursework assessment, the Assessment Procedure states that course coordinators will ensure students are informed about appropriate use of generative AI and similar tools in the course.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność92%

Wartość znormalizowana: coursework_students_informed_appropriate_genai_use

Ostatnio sprawdzono
13 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
13 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
The [Course Coordinator] will ensure students are informed about the standards associated with evidence-based academic writing, the appropriate use of generative artificial intelligence and similar tools, and relevant scholarly and/or professional conventions that apply to assessment in the course.
Język źródła
English (en-AU)
Skrót migawki
d7f74391…
Pobrano
13 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Procedure section 6 - Communication with students

Source record

Oficjalne źródła

8 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Recenzjaagent reviewedPewność97%Snapshot statusstrongSuma kontrolna migawki1fcba5ff…JSONPubliczne JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Adelaide University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/adelaide-university

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Otwórz dziennik zmian