University AI Policy Tracker

Otwarte, oparte na dowodach rekordy polityk AI uczelni do publicznego uzycia.

APIGitHub
Jezyk
ENZHFRPL

Change log

Adelaide University

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 13, 2026Last changedMay 13, 2026Claims8Sources7Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Adelaide University currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 7 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 13, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Adelaide University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Adelaide University combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+16-0
11 # Adelaide University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Adelaide University's Academic Integrity Policy treats inappropriate use of AI that subverts an assignment or gives unfair academic advantage as an example of academic misconduct, including submitting AI-produced work as the student's own or using AI-generated information without acknowledgement.
3+Evidence (en-AU, dab458386e90): Inappropriate use of artificial intelligence (AI) - is to subvert the aims of assignment or give the student an unfair academic advantage. Inappropriate use of AI can include but is not limited to: submitting work produced (or produced in part) by generative artificial intelligence as the student's own work; using information generated by artificial intelligence without acknowledgement or attribution.
4+research: Adelaide University's Authorship Procedure states that generative AI can be used to improve readability and clarity in publications, but must not be considered or listed as an author and its use must be disclosed transparently.
5+Evidence (en-AU, 51693b3d379b): Generative AI can be used in publications to improve the readability and clarity of written content by assisting authors with generating drafts, revising language, and suggesting phrasing. Generative AI must not be considered an author itself, and its use must be disclosed transparently.
6+ai_tool_treatment: Adelaide University's invigilated online exam rules state that students may use only tools, software, or materials explicitly approved in exam instructions, and list AI tools such as ChatGPT as not permitted.
7+Evidence (en-AU, 9c5d5891bb42): Note: Anything not listed is prohibited. Use only tools, software, or materials explicitly approved in your exam instructions. This includes: No collaboration tools (email, forums, etc.); No additional electronic devices; No AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT); No physical items (pens, paper, calculators).
8+research: Adelaide University's Graduate Research School guidance says graduate research students' use of generative AI must be transparent and responsible, including discussing use with a supervisor, keeping records, and acknowledging AI use in thesis acknowledgements, presentations, and publications.
9+Evidence (en-AU, 38e94448e37a): Generative AI tools generate new content such as text or images based on prompts from the user. These tools can support your research, but their use must be transparent and responsible. You must: discuss AI use with your supervisor; keep records of programs or applications used, dates and prompts; include an AI use statement in your thesis acknowledgements; acknowledge AI use in presentations and publications.
10+privacy: Adelaide University's Graduate Research School guidance tells graduate research students not to upload sensitive, copyrighted, or confidential information, or unprotected intellectual property, into AI tools.
11+Evidence (en-AU, 38e94448e37a): You must not: generate thesis content using AI (unless quoted and cited); translate large portions of text using AI; upload sensitive, copyrighted or confidential information into AI tools; upload unprotected intellectual property into AI tools.
12+academic_integrity: Adelaide University's Academic Misconduct Procedure lists inappropriate use of Artificial Intelligence with plagiarism in its outcome table, with a standard outcome of mark reduction up to and including zero for the assignment.
13+Evidence (en-AU, 4b29ea26c6b9): Type of academic misconduct: Plagiarism; Inappropriate use of Artificial Intelligence. Standard Outcome: Reduction of mark up to and including zero for the assignment. Mitigated outcome: a warning; submission of a corrected version of the affected component for a maximum of 50% for assignment; a reduction of mark. Exacerbated outcome: zero for assignment; zero for course.
14+security_review: Adelaide University's Cyber Security Policy states that AI systems are part of its digital environment and are subject to the same cyber security, data protection, and compliance requirements as other information systems.
15+Evidence (en-AU, 945cf29f614f): Adelaide University recognises that artificial intelligence (AI) systems form part of its digital environment and are subject to the same cyber security, data protection, and compliance requirements as other information systems.
16+teaching: For Adelaide University coursework assessment, the Assessment Procedure states that course coordinators will ensure students are informed about appropriate use of generative AI and similar tools in the course.
17+Evidence (en-AU, d7f74391d0a0): The [Course Coordinator] will ensure students are informed about the standards associated with evidence-based academic writing, the appropriate use of generative artificial intelligence and similar tools, and relevant scholarly and/or professional conventions that apply to assessment in the course.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

8 claim records

security_review

Adelaide University's Cyber Security Policy states that AI systems are part of its digital environment and are subject to the same cyber security, data protection, and compliance requirements as other information systems.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

research

Adelaide University's Authorship Procedure states that generative AI can be used to improve readability and clarity in publications, but must not be considered or listed as an author and its use must be disclosed transparently.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

privacy

Adelaide University's Graduate Research School guidance tells graduate research students not to upload sensitive, copyrighted, or confidential information, or unprotected intellectual property, into AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

research

Adelaide University's Graduate Research School guidance says graduate research students' use of generative AI must be transparent and responsible, including discussing use with a supervisor, keeping records, and acknowledging AI use in thesis acknowledgements, presentations, and publications.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

ai_tool_treatment

Adelaide University's invigilated online exam rules state that students may use only tools, software, or materials explicitly approved in exam instructions, and list AI tools such as ChatGPT as not permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

teaching

For Adelaide University coursework assessment, the Assessment Procedure states that course coordinators will ensure students are informed about appropriate use of generative AI and similar tools in the course.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

academic_integrity

Adelaide University's Academic Misconduct Procedure lists inappropriate use of Artificial Intelligence with plagiarism in its outcome table, with a standard outcome of mark reduction up to and including zero for the assignment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

academic_integrity

Adelaide University's Academic Integrity Policy treats inappropriate use of AI that subverts an assignment or gives unfair academic advantage as an example of academic misconduct, including submitting AI-produced work as the student's own or using AI-generated information without acknowledgement.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

Source snapshots

7 source attributions