Change log

Adelaide University

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Adelaide University currently has 9 source-backed claim records and 8 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: Jul 15, 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

This page combines all public release diffs for Adelaide University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted1Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added1Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Adelaide University combined release diff

Comparing public-release-20260714-002 to public-release-20260715-005.

+5-0
11 # Adelaide University AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Microsoft Copilot is listed for Adelaide University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
5+Evidence (en, 18ae051da089): Adelaide University's Library guide says Microsoft Copilot is available through a university account, follows university data-security guidelines, and is the recommended starting point for common academic tasks.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-15T23:04:43.896Z
47 ## Source attribution added
58 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
9+Source https://au.libguides.com/aistudy/genaitools snapshot 18ae051da089c659adf8dfd92dad4184630d35614bac591573c6fb5d8677cfdb
10+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-15T23:04:43.896Z

Release history

1 public release diff

public-release-20260715-005

Compared with public-release-20260714-002.

Policy text0Newly extracted1Source snapshots0Source text0

Adelaide University public-release-20260715-005 diff

Comparing public-release-20260714-002 to public-release-20260715-005.

+5-0
11 # Adelaide University AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Microsoft Copilot is listed for Adelaide University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
5+Evidence (en, 18ae051da089): Adelaide University's Library guide says Microsoft Copilot is available through a university account, follows university data-security guidelines, and is the recommended starting point for common academic tasks.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-15T23:04:43.896Z
47 ## Source attribution added
58 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
9+Source https://au.libguides.com/aistudy/genaitools snapshot 18ae051da089c659adf8dfd92dad4184630d35614bac591573c6fb5d8677cfdb
10+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-15T23:04:43.896Z

Claim changes

9 claim records

ai_tool_treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Adelaide University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

Adelaide University's Cyber Security Policy states that AI systems are part of its digital environment and are subject to the same cyber security, data protection, and compliance requirements as other information systems.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

research

Adelaide University's Authorship Procedure states that generative AI can be used to improve readability and clarity in publications, but must not be considered or listed as an author and its use must be disclosed transparently.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

privacy

Adelaide University's Graduate Research School guidance tells graduate research students not to upload sensitive, copyrighted, or confidential information, or unprotected intellectual property, into AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

research

Adelaide University's Graduate Research School guidance says graduate research students' use of generative AI must be transparent and responsible, including discussing use with a supervisor, keeping records, and acknowledging AI use in thesis acknowledgements, presentations, and publications.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

ai_tool_treatment

Adelaide University's invigilated online exam rules state that students may use only tools, software, or materials explicitly approved in exam instructions, and list AI tools such as ChatGPT as not permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

teaching

For Adelaide University coursework assessment, the Assessment Procedure states that course coordinators will ensure students are informed about appropriate use of generative AI and similar tools in the course.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

academic_integrity

Adelaide University's Academic Misconduct Procedure lists inappropriate use of Artificial Intelligence with plagiarism in its outcome table, with a standard outcome of mark reduction up to and including zero for the assignment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

academic_integrity

Adelaide University's Academic Integrity Policy treats inappropriate use of AI that subverts an assignment or gives unfair academic advantage as an example of academic misconduct, including submitting AI-produced work as the student's own or using AI-generated information without acknowledgement.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

Source snapshots

8 source attributions

Generative AI tools - Artificial Intelligence for Study - LibGuides at Adelaide University

official_guidance Tracker checked at Jul 15, 2026, 11:04 PM

Snapshot hash
18ae051da089c659adf8dfd92dad4184630d35614bac591573c6fb5d8677cfdb