Adelaide, Australia Last checked Jul 19, 2026

Adelaide University

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Can I use AI for my coursework?Scoped public references; review pending Do I need to disclose AI use?Scoped public references; review pending Can I upload sensitive data?Scoped public references; review pending Which tools can I access?Scoped public references; review pending

Use in ChatGPT ↗Before you submitAdvice and precautions Record updates ↓

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Scoped public references; review pending

Adelaide’s coursework procedure says course coordinators must inform students about appropriate GenAI use in the course. It does not grant blanket permission for every assignment.

Official source ↗

Exams

Scoped public references; review pending

For Adelaide’s invigilated online exams, the retained rules require explicitly approved tools and list AI tools such as ChatGPT among prohibited items. Check your exam instructions.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Scoped public references; review pending

Adelaide identifies unacknowledged AI-generated information as potentially inappropriate use. Graduate researchers also have specific recordkeeping and thesis/publication acknowledgement requirements.

Official source ↗

Privacy and data

Scoped public references; review pending

Adelaide Graduate Research School guidance tells graduate researchers not to upload sensitive, copyrighted or confidential information, or unprotected IP, into AI tools.

Official source ↗

Tools and eligibility

Scoped public references; review pending

The retained Adelaide tool records do not establish current account eligibility or costs. Institutional access is separate from course and exam permission.

Research and publication

Scoped public references; review pending

Adelaide graduate researchers must discuss AI use with supervisors, keep records and acknowledge use. The authorship procedure allows readability support, requires transparent disclosure and excludes AI authorship.

Official source ↗

Academic integrity

Scoped public references; review pending

Adelaide’s policy identifies AI use that subverts an assignment or gives unfair advantage as misconduct, including passing AI-produced work off as one’s own. No general penalty is concluded here.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Scoped public references; review pending

Adelaide course coordinators are responsible for informing students about appropriate GenAI use and relevant scholarly or professional conventions for the assessment.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Scoped public references; review pending

Adelaide’s Cyber Security Policy places AI systems under the same cyber security, data protection and compliance requirements as other information systems. It does not certify a particular tool.

Official source ↗

Do

For Adelaide coursework, check the coordinator’s instructions on appropriate AI use.
Site advice
For Adelaide coursework, check the coordinator’s instructions on appropriate AI use.
Scope
These are Adelaide University references for the institution operating in 2026. Coursework, invigilated online exams and graduate research/publications have distinct rules; predecessor policies are not inherited here.
For Adelaide University coursework assessment, the Assessment Procedure states that course coordinators will ensure students are informed about appropriate use of generative AI and similar tools in the course.
Original evidence and scope
For Adelaide University coursework assessment, the Assessment Procedure states that course coordinators will ensure students are informed about appropriate use of generative AI and similar tools in the course.
claim-adelaide-003
Adelaide University operative in 2026 is distinct from its predecessors. Coursework integrity/assessment, invigilated online exams and graduate research/authorship rules have different audiences. Early Resolution is a limited procedure; no general sanction or appeal deadline is confirmed. Original public references remain pending currentness review.
The [Course Coordinator] will ensure students are informed about the standards associated with evidence-based academic writing, the appropriate use of generative artificial intelligence and similar tools, and relevant scholarly and/or professional conventions that apply to assessment in the course.
Procedure section 6 - Communication with students
Official university source ↗
Adelaide graduate researchers: discuss AI use with your supervisor, keep usage records and acknowledge it as the guidance requires.
Requirement in this scope
Adelaide graduate researchers: discuss AI use with your supervisor, keep usage records and acknowledge it as the guidance requires.
Scope
These are Adelaide University references for the institution operating in 2026. Coursework, invigilated online exams and graduate research/publications have distinct rules; predecessor policies are not inherited here.
Adelaide University's Graduate Research School guidance says graduate research students' use of generative AI must be transparent and responsible, including discussing use with a supervisor, keeping records, and acknowledging AI use in thesis acknowledgements, presentations, and publications.
Original evidence and scope
Adelaide University's Graduate Research School guidance says graduate research students' use of generative AI must be transparent and responsible, including discussing use with a supervisor, keeping records, and acknowledging AI use in thesis acknowledgements, presentations, and publications.
claim-adelaide-005
Graduate Research School graduate-research guidance; do not apply as the coursework discipline procedure.
Generative AI tools generate new content such as text or images based on prompts from the user. These tools can support your research, but their use must be transparent and responsible. You must: discuss AI use with your supervisor; keep records of programs or applications used, dates and prompts; include an AI use statement in your thesis acknowledgements; acknowledge AI use in presentations and publications.
Using generative AI
Official university source ↗
For Adelaide publications using GenAI, disclose its use transparently.
Requirement in this scope
For Adelaide publications using GenAI, disclose its use transparently.
Scope
These are Adelaide University references for the institution operating in 2026. Coursework, invigilated online exams and graduate research/publications have distinct rules; predecessor policies are not inherited here.
Adelaide University's Authorship Procedure states that generative AI can be used to improve readability and clarity in publications, but must not be considered or listed as an author and its use must be disclosed transparently.
Original evidence and scope
Adelaide University's Authorship Procedure states that generative AI can be used to improve readability and clarity in publications, but must not be considered or listed as an author and its use must be disclosed transparently.
claim-adelaide-007
Authorship/publication procedure; disclosure here is publication-specific.
Generative AI can be used in publications to improve the readability and clarity of written content by assisting authors with generating drafts, revising language, and suggesting phrasing. Generative AI must not be considered an author itself, and its use must be disclosed transparently.
Section 3.2 - Generative Artificial Intelligence
Official university source ↗

Don’t

Do not use AI tools such as ChatGPT in Adelaide invigilated online exams under the retained exam rules.
Requirement in this scope
Do not use AI tools such as ChatGPT in Adelaide invigilated online exams under the retained exam rules.
Scope
These are Adelaide University references for the institution operating in 2026. Coursework, invigilated online exams and graduate research/publications have distinct rules; predecessor policies are not inherited here.
Adelaide University's invigilated online exam rules state that students may use only tools, software, or materials explicitly approved in exam instructions, and list AI tools such as ChatGPT as not permitted.
Original evidence and scope
Adelaide University's invigilated online exam rules state that students may use only tools, software, or materials explicitly approved in exam instructions, and list AI tools such as ChatGPT as not permitted.
claim-adelaide-004
Invigilated online exams and their approved exam instructions only; not every learning activity.
Note: Anything not listed is prohibited. Use only tools, software, or materials explicitly approved in your exam instructions. This includes: No collaboration tools (email, forums, etc.); No additional electronic devices; No AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT); No physical items (pens, paper, calculators).
Approved tools only
Official university source ↗
Adelaide graduate researchers: do not upload sensitive, copyrighted or confidential information, or unprotected IP, into AI tools.
Requirement in this scope
Adelaide graduate researchers: do not upload sensitive, copyrighted or confidential information, or unprotected IP, into AI tools.
Scope
These are Adelaide University references for the institution operating in 2026. Coursework, invigilated online exams and graduate research/publications have distinct rules; predecessor policies are not inherited here.
Adelaide University's Graduate Research School guidance tells graduate research students not to upload sensitive, copyrighted, or confidential information, or unprotected intellectual property, into AI tools.
Original evidence and scope
Adelaide University's Graduate Research School guidance tells graduate research students not to upload sensitive, copyrighted, or confidential information, or unprotected intellectual property, into AI tools.
claim-adelaide-006
Graduate research data/IP guidance; not a universal tool access determination.
You must not: generate thesis content using AI (unless quoted and cited); translate large portions of text using AI; upload sensitive, copyrighted or confidential information into AI tools; upload unprotected intellectual property into AI tools.
Using generative AI
Official university source ↗
Do not list generative AI as an author of an Adelaide publication.
Requirement in this scope
Do not list generative AI as an author of an Adelaide publication.
Scope
These are Adelaide University references for the institution operating in 2026. Coursework, invigilated online exams and graduate research/publications have distinct rules; predecessor policies are not inherited here.
Adelaide University's Authorship Procedure states that generative AI can be used to improve readability and clarity in publications, but must not be considered or listed as an author and its use must be disclosed transparently.
Original evidence and scope
Adelaide University's Authorship Procedure states that generative AI can be used to improve readability and clarity in publications, but must not be considered or listed as an author and its use must be disclosed transparently.
claim-adelaide-007
Authorship/publication procedure; disclosure here is publication-specific.
Generative AI can be used in publications to improve the readability and clarity of written content by assisting authors with generating drafts, revising language, and suggesting phrasing. Generative AI must not be considered an author itself, and its use must be disclosed transparently.
Section 3.2 - Generative Artificial Intelligence
Official university source ↗

AI use questioned?Investigation, possible outcomes and appeal

Tool discovery records: scope pending review

Tool discovery information and cited sources are retained. Current account eligibility, cost, endorsement and assessment permission are not confirmed.

ChatGPT

Microsoft Copilot

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 3

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

2026-10-27Page update
Other records · Page update
View revision
Loading revision…
2026-10-26Record maintenance
Other records · Record maintenance
View revision
Loading revision…
2026-10-25Record maintenance
Other records · Record maintenance
View revision
Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

Historical and pending public Claims (2)

These original public records and sources remain traceable. They are excluded from current topics, FAQ, submission and Analysis conclusions and do not establish current permission.

cl-adelaide-university-microsoft-copilot-345 · excluded_pending_review

Adelaide University operative in 2026 is distinct from its predecessors. Coursework integrity/assessment, invigilated online exams and graduate research/authorship rules have different audiences. Early Resolution is a limited procedure; no general sanction or appeal deadline is confirmed. Original public references remain pending currentness review.

Original record retained for provenance; version, scope, qualification or tool-derived conclusion requires review. Excluded from current topics, FAQ, submission and Analysis.

Record history

claim-adelaide-002 · excluded_pending_review

Coursework misconduct outcome table; standard outcomes, alternatives and Early Resolution scope require review; excluded from current conclusions.

Original record retained for provenance; version, scope, qualification or tool-derived conclusion requires review. Excluded from current topics, FAQ, submission and Analysis.

Record history

Official sources

8 official URLs; 8 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

Academic Integrity Policy | Policies and Procedures | Adelaide University

adelaideuni.edu.au

University official source

adelaideuni.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Academic Integrity Policy | Policies and Procedures | Adelaide University · 2026-05-13T12:46:10Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

dab458386e900f4d5a9b3122cba9d849e1d9ef1d9dfa9c2bfecbe3ad1d370fb0

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Academic Misconduct Procedure | Policies and Procedures | Adelaide University

adelaideuni.edu.au

University official source

adelaideuni.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Academic Misconduct Procedure | Policies and Procedures | Adelaide University · 2026-05-13T12:47:30Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

4b29ea26c6b9b4fd75fa0479dcc392910873dda16a4c94cff1ff25d8ba9a578a

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Assessment Procedure | Policies and Procedures | Adelaide University

adelaideuni.edu.au

University official source

adelaideuni.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Assessment Procedure | Policies and Procedures | Adelaide University · 2026-05-13T12:49:05Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

d7f74391d0a0c8fc0c759fb1e3ec58ad23d1cb821725b1295d30e0b9d8603311

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Authorship Procedure | Policies and Procedures | Adelaide University

adelaideuni.edu.au

University official source

adelaideuni.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Authorship Procedure | Policies and Procedures | Adelaide University · 2026-05-13T12:55:05Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

51693b3d379b6fa9b5d8f473b0c3c8cb58a5f3a2f7c490849db948da88e99de3

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Conduct of research | Graduate Research School | Adelaide University

adelaideuni.edu.au

University official source

adelaideuni.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Conduct of research | Graduate Research School | Adelaide University · 2026-05-13T12:54:20Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

38e94448e37af95ef43529924bdf11c9b3aa58255f86a4217b46288ed4e3ea8f

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Cyber Security Policy | Policies and Procedures | Adelaide University

adelaideuni.edu.au

University official source

adelaideuni.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Cyber Security Policy | Policies and Procedures | Adelaide University · 2026-05-13T13:00:10Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

945cf29f614f18dda7b06c4807d1ec0cdd7a7d79e7969386edf5d4b827df68be

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Generative AI tools - Artificial Intelligence for Study - LibGuides at Adelaide University

au.libguides.com

University official source

au.libguides.com

Hash and captured version

Generative AI tools - Artificial Intelligence for Study - LibGuides at Adelaide University · 2026-07-15T23:04:43.896Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

18ae051da089c659adf8dfd92dad4184630d35614bac591573c6fb5d8677cfdb

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Online exam rules | Current Students | Adelaide University

adelaideuni.edu.au

University official source

adelaideuni.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Online exam rules | Current Students | Adelaide University · 2026-05-13T12:53:00Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

9c5d5891bb42e1af818865b12c6b90e2938641b37275d52442907324c2ae6419

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state: agent_reviewed
Analysis review state: machine_candidate
Record revision: qs71-90-v6-completeness-r3-20261025
Dataset release: public-release-20260924-002
Correction published: 2026-10-26T02:55:31.205Z
Student snapshot: Not published

Current reviewed JSON · All record history

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

Policy semantic review remains PARTIAL. Original HTML/PDF bytes unavailable; inherited source hash representations unresolved.
Tool discovery does not establish current eligibility, cost, endorsement or assessment permission.

Current reviewed JSON

Questions students ask

Can I use AI for my coursework?

Adelaide’s coursework procedure says course coordinators must inform students about appropriate GenAI use in the course. It does not grant blanket permission for every assignment.

View evidence →

Do I need to disclose AI use?

View evidence →

Can I upload sensitive data?

Adelaide Graduate Research School guidance tells graduate researchers not to upload sensitive, copyrighted or confidential information, or unprotected IP, into AI tools.

View evidence →

Which tools can I access?

The retained Adelaide tool records do not establish current account eligibility or costs. Institutional access is separate from course and exam permission.

View evidence →

What are the examination rules?

For Adelaide’s invigilated online exams, the retained rules require explicitly approved tools and list AI tools such as ChatGPT among prohibited items. Check your exam instructions.

View evidence →

What rules apply to research and publication?

View evidence →

What counts as academic misconduct?

Adelaide’s policy identifies AI use that subverts an assignment or gives unfair advantage as misconduct, including passing AI-produced work off as one’s own. No general penalty is concluded here.

View evidence →

What guidance applies to teaching?

Adelaide course coordinators are responsible for informing students about appropriate GenAI use and relevant scholarly or professional conventions for the assessment.

View evidence →

What security and procurement requirements apply?

Adelaide’s Cyber Security Policy places AI systems under the same cyber security, data protection and compliance requirements as other information systems. It does not certify a particular tool.

View evidence →

When was this record checked?

Record checked: 2026-07-19

Record version →

Which official sources support these rules?

Official source →

Where can I read the full evidence?

9 · Full policy evidence

Full policy evidence →

Adelaide University

What would you like to check?

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Exams

Disclosure

Privacy and data

Tools and eligibility

Research and publication

Academic integrity

Teaching guidance

Security and procurement

Do

Don’t

Tool discovery records: scope pending review

ChatGPT

Microsoft Copilot

Reviewed claims

Official sources

Academic Integrity Policy | Policies and Procedures | Adelaide University

Academic Misconduct Procedure | Policies and Procedures | Adelaide University

Assessment Procedure | Policies and Procedures | Adelaide University

Authorship Procedure | Policies and Procedures | Adelaide University

Conduct of research | Graduate Research School | Adelaide University

Cyber Security Policy | Policies and Procedures | Adelaide University

Generative AI tools - Artificial Intelligence for Study - LibGuides at Adelaide University

Online exam rules | Current Students | Adelaide University

Related university AI policy records

Questions students ask