Olsztyn, Poland

University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage2 reviewedEvidence-backed claims2Reviewed2Candidate0Official sources2Source languageplPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-warmia-and-mazury-in-olsztyn.json

Policy profile

Coverage score45/100Coverage labelpartial public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence72%

Coursework

No source-backed public claim about coursework AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about coursework, assignments, or syllabus-level AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Exams

No source-backed public claim about exam AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about exams, tests, quizzes, or examination conditions.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence73%Evidence1Sources1

Academic integrity

No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Teaching guidance

No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

2 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Research

UWM-hosted Acta Neophilologica author guidance permits GenAI use for grammar, language, or style improvement, requires manuscript disclosure of any GenAI use with tool and purpose, and says reviewers and editors should not share confidential manuscript content with public GenAI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: journal_scope_author_genai_disclosure_and_confidentiality

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Evidence 1
Autorzy mogą korzystać z narzędzi generatywnej sztucznej inteligencji (GenAI) (np. ChatGPT) w celu poprawy gramatyki, języka lub stylu... Każde użycie GenAI musi być zgłoszone w manuskrypcie... Recenzenci i redaktorzy nie powinni udostępniać poufnych treści manuskryptów publicznym narzędziom GenAI.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

Authors may use GenAI for grammar, language, or style; any use must be disclosed in the manuscript; reviewers and editors should not share confidential manuscript content with public GenAI tools.

Research

UWM-hosted Studia Prawnoustrojowe publication-ethics guidance requires authors to declare that no part of the work was fully generated by AI unless methodologically justified, with AI-generated fragments clearly marked and the purpose of AI use given; it also states illustrations in the article are not generated by AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%

Normalized value: journal_scope_ai_generated_content_declaration

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Evidence 1
Autorzy oświadczają, że żadna część niniejszej pracy nie została w pełni wygenerowana przez narzędzie sztucznej inteligencji (AI), chyba, że jest to uzasadnione metodologicznie a wykorzystane fragmenty są wyraźnie zaznaczone w tekście wraz z podaniem celu wykorzystania AI. Żadne ilustracje zawarte w tekście artykułu nie są wygenerowane przez AI.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

Authors declare that no part of the work was fully generated by AI unless methodologically justified, that AI-used fragments are marked with the purpose of use, and that article illustrations are not AI-generated.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

2 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 26, 2026Last changedMay 26, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities