Policy presence
University of Toledo has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Toledo, United States
University of Toledo
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
University of Toledo has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
University of Toledo has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of Toledo has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of Toledo has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of Toledo has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.
Teaching guidance
University of Toledo has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of Toledo has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
The University of Toledo College of Law generative AI policy adopts a default rule that permits some uses of generative AI but bans uses that would be plagiaristic if the output had been composed by a human author.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: college_of_law_default_rule_bans_plagiaristic_ai_use
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Evidence 1we adopt the following default rule, which enables some uses of generative AI but also bans uses of generative AI that would be plagiaristic if generative AI's output had been composed by a human author.
Academic Integrity
UToledo's Academic dishonesty policy lists representing the words, ideas, or information of an artificial intelligence program as one's own without proper documentation as an example of academic dishonesty, and says faculty are expected to tell students what materials and procedures, including artificial intelligence programs, are authorized.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: academic_dishonesty_policy_mentions_ai_programs_documentation_and_authorization
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Evidence 1Plagiarizing or representing the words, ideas or information of another person or artificial intelligence program as one's own and not offering proper documentation; Faculty members are expected to inform their students explicitly as to what materials and procedures are authorized for use in the preparation of assignments or in examinations (e.g., the use of a calculator, computer, artificial intelligence programs, text materials, etc.).
Teaching
UToledo's Simple Syllabus guidance says the AI Tool Usage section is required and private, and instructors must select or enter a statement explaining how generative AI tools may be used, limited, or prohibited in the course.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: simple_syllabus_ai_tool_usage_required
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Evidence 1The AI Tool Usage section is required and private and must be completed before submission. Instructors must select or enter a statement explaining how generative AI tools may be used, limited, or prohibited in the course.
Academic Integrity
Within the University of Toledo College of Law default rule, generative AI may be used for research-like search, grammar correction, and other functions attendant to completing an assignment, but may not compose submitted assignment text and may not be used for any exam purpose unless an instructor deviates in writing with notice.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: college_of_law_research_grammar_allowed_composition_exam_use_restricted
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Evidence 1May be used to perform research in ways similar to search engines such as Google, for correction of grammar, and for other functions attendant to completing an assignment. The software may not be used to compose any part of the submitted assignment. May not be used for any purpose in any exam situation.
Source Status
The University of Toledo maintains a central Office of the Provost AI Policies page that points instructors to optional syllabus language for AI and links to a College of Law generative AI policy.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: central_provost_ai_policy_index
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Evidence 1UToledo has provided optional syllabus language for instructors who wish to include a statement on AI. The examples are to assist in establishing clear guidelines concerning the integration of generative AI tools within your course.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
4 source attribution
Academic dishonesty
utoledo.edu
AI Policies
utoledo.edu
Assignments, AI Tool and Policies
utoledo.edu
College of Law Generative Artificial Intelligence Policy
utoledo.edu