Bratislava, Slovakia

Comenius University Bratislava

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Beoordeelde beweringen

4 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

For generative AI used to prepare materials or structure, the appendix recommends a general statement listing the AI tools and purpose, while keeping responsibility for correctness with the author.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen88%

Genormaliseerde waarde: recommended_generai_ai_use_statement_author_responsibility

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
It is recommended to provide at least a general statement: "In the preparation of this work, AI tools [LIST OF TOOLS] were used for the purpose of [REASON]. Responsibility for the correctness of the resulting text lies with the author."

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

The appendix recommends a general statement naming the AI tools and purpose, and says the author remains responsible for correctness.

Academic Integrity

An official Comenius-hosted appendix recommends that work using artificial intelligence tools begin with an originality declaration indicating that AI tools were used.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen86%

Genormaliseerde waarde: recommended_originality_declaration_for_ai_tools

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
It is recommended to begin work with a declaration on oath regarding the originality of the work... using the literature listed in the attached list and artificial intelligence tools.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

The appendix recommends an originality declaration that discloses use of artificial intelligence tools.

Academic Integrity

The same official advisory source states that ChatGPT does not replace the full writing process and that the student remains responsible for the final submitted work.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen79%

Genormaliseerde waarde: student_responsibility_for_final_work_when_using_chatgpt

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Program nenahradzuje celý proces, za finálnu prácu je vždy zodpovedný práve študent.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

The source says the program does not replace the whole process and the student remains responsible for the final work.

Onderwijs

An official Comenius University news interview presents ChatGPT as a study aid that should be taught for reasonable, critical use rather than treated as something to ban outright.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen76%

Genormaliseerde waarde: official_news_advisory_chatgpt_reasonable_critical_use

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Preto si myslím, že nie je správne ich používanie zakazovať, radšej by sme študentov a študentky mali naučiť používať ich rozumným spôsobom.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

An official university news interview says it is better to teach students to use ChatGPT reasonably than to ban it.

Source record

Officiële bronnen

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Beoordelenagent reviewedVertrouwen88%Snapshot statusNiet gepubliceerdJSONOpenbaar JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Comenius University Bratislava AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 18, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/comenius-university-bratislava

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Wijzigingslogboek openen