University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Taal
ENZHFRPLNL

Wijzigingslogboek

Xi'an Jiaotong Liverpool University

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldLaatst gecontroleerd31 mei 2026Laatst gewijzigd31 mei 2026Claims5Bronnen3Laatste releasepublic-release-20260612-001Releaseregistraties1
UniversiteitspaginaOpenbaar JSONMaandrapportUniversiteitsindex

Samenvatting wijzigingen

Huidige actualiteit en beoordelingsstatus van openbare gegevens.

Xi'an Jiaotong Liverpool University currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 31 mei 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 5 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

Deze pagina combineert alle openbare releasediffs voor Xi'an Jiaotong Liverpool University. Individuele releasesnapshots blijven beschikbaar via hun release-specifieke URL's.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Zojuist geëxtraheerde beweringen zijn toevoegingen aan de tracker en zijn niet per se recent door de universiteit gepubliceerd. Wijzigingen in bron-snapshots tonen hashwijzigingen voor dezelfde bron-URL en zijn op zichzelf geen beleidswijzigingen.

Diff-categorieën

Semantische classificatie voor deze release diff.

Beleidstekst0Zojuist geëxtraheerd5Bewijs0Bronsnapshots0Bron tekst0Bron toegevoegd3Bron verwijderd0

Gecombineerd releasediff

Geünificeerde trackerdiff gegenereerd vanuit alle openbare releasesnapshots voor deze universiteit.

Xi'an Jiaotong Liverpool University combined release verschil

public-release-20260526-003 vergelijken met public-release-20260612-001.

+21-0
11 # Xi'an Jiaotong Liverpool University AI policy diff
22 ## Source attribution added
33 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
4+Source https://libguides.lib.xjtlu.edu.cn/Generative-AI/Citing-AIGC snapshot 5e42fa5bb69c602e69efc95f09c79b66e22b714c28c929dd7d29649789691f38
5+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:42:36.000Z
46 ## Source attribution added
57 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
8+Source https://www.xjtlu.edu.cn/en/study/departments/using-ai-for-teaching/using-ai-chatbot-for-teaching-version2-2 snapshot 8478ea551007a339b916b9499636e7597077a610b9bbf6d9596e9979bfb7eb24
9+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:43:34.000Z
610 ## Source attribution added
711 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
12+Source https://www.xjtlu.edu.cn/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/XJTLU-Education-AI-Strategic-Framework.pdf snapshot 064b1f8e03afc8d98409d304600d29e1f6647e1786960ae707c09397392927b7
13+Source Last-Modified: 2025-03-12T06:40:47.000Z
814 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
915 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
16+source_status: XJTLU's 2025-2028 Education + AI Strategic Framework sets an objective to develop and implement a robust AI policy framework for ethical AI development, deployment, and use; the source is a strategic framework rather than a standalone binding student AI policy.
17+Evidence (en, 064b1f8e03af): To develop and implement a robust AI policy framework that governs the ethical development, deployment, and use of AI technologies.
18+Source Last-Modified: 2025-03-12T06:40:47.000Z
1019 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1120 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
21+academic_integrity: XJTLU Library's GenAI citation guide advises that information provided by generative AI should always be checked and verified because it can be false, biased, out of date, or hallucinated.
22+Evidence (en, 5e42fa5bb69c): information provided by Generative AI should always be checked and verified, because GenAI can sometimes generate false information that may be false, biased, or out of date and does not accurately reflect reality, known as "AI hallucination".
23+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:42:36.000Z
1224 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1325 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
26+academic_integrity: XJTLU's strategic framework says the university will continuously review and update policy and procedures as necessary for appropriate and inappropriate AI use by students.
27+Evidence (en, 064b1f8e03af): To continuously review and update as necessary University policy and procedures with respect to the appropriate and inappropriate use of AI by students.
28+Source Last-Modified: 2025-03-12T06:40:47.000Z
1429 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1530 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
31+teaching: XJTLU's official teaching resource on AI chatbots identifies reliability and accuracy problems, data privacy, potential bias, and academic integrity risk as challenges that need to be addressed.
32+Evidence (en-US, 8478ea551007): AI chatbots may not be very reliable or accurate, which could lead to misinformation or misleading students. Issues such as data privacy, potential biases in AI algorithms, and the risk of compromising academic integrity are also significant challenges that need to be addressed.
33+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:43:34.000Z
1634 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1735 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
36+privacy: For the XIPU AI platform, XJTLU's strategic framework sets an objective to establish ethical-use guidelines focusing on data privacy, bias mitigation, and transparency.
37+Evidence (en, 064b1f8e03af): Ethical AI Use: To establish guidelines for the ethical use of AI models, focusing on issues like data privacy, bias mitigation, and transparency, to ensure responsible AI practices.
38+Source Last-Modified: 2025-03-12T06:40:47.000Z

Geschiedenis releases

1 verschil openbare publicatie

public-release-20260612-001

Vergeleken met public-release-20260526-003.

Beleidstekst0Zojuist geëxtraheerd5Bronsnapshots0Bron tekst0
Verschil van releaseDiff JSON

Xi'an Jiaotong Liverpool University public-release-20260612-001 verschil

public-release-20260526-003 vergelijken met public-release-20260612-001.

+21-0
11 # Xi'an Jiaotong Liverpool University AI policy diff
22 ## Source attribution added
33 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
4+Source https://libguides.lib.xjtlu.edu.cn/Generative-AI/Citing-AIGC snapshot 5e42fa5bb69c602e69efc95f09c79b66e22b714c28c929dd7d29649789691f38
5+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:42:36.000Z
46 ## Source attribution added
57 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
8+Source https://www.xjtlu.edu.cn/en/study/departments/using-ai-for-teaching/using-ai-chatbot-for-teaching-version2-2 snapshot 8478ea551007a339b916b9499636e7597077a610b9bbf6d9596e9979bfb7eb24
9+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:43:34.000Z
610 ## Source attribution added
711 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
12+Source https://www.xjtlu.edu.cn/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/XJTLU-Education-AI-Strategic-Framework.pdf snapshot 064b1f8e03afc8d98409d304600d29e1f6647e1786960ae707c09397392927b7
13+Source Last-Modified: 2025-03-12T06:40:47.000Z
814 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
915 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
16+source_status: XJTLU's 2025-2028 Education + AI Strategic Framework sets an objective to develop and implement a robust AI policy framework for ethical AI development, deployment, and use; the source is a strategic framework rather than a standalone binding student AI policy.
17+Evidence (en, 064b1f8e03af): To develop and implement a robust AI policy framework that governs the ethical development, deployment, and use of AI technologies.
18+Source Last-Modified: 2025-03-12T06:40:47.000Z
1019 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1120 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
21+academic_integrity: XJTLU Library's GenAI citation guide advises that information provided by generative AI should always be checked and verified because it can be false, biased, out of date, or hallucinated.
22+Evidence (en, 5e42fa5bb69c): information provided by Generative AI should always be checked and verified, because GenAI can sometimes generate false information that may be false, biased, or out of date and does not accurately reflect reality, known as "AI hallucination".
23+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:42:36.000Z
1224 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1325 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
26+academic_integrity: XJTLU's strategic framework says the university will continuously review and update policy and procedures as necessary for appropriate and inappropriate AI use by students.
27+Evidence (en, 064b1f8e03af): To continuously review and update as necessary University policy and procedures with respect to the appropriate and inappropriate use of AI by students.
28+Source Last-Modified: 2025-03-12T06:40:47.000Z
1429 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1530 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
31+teaching: XJTLU's official teaching resource on AI chatbots identifies reliability and accuracy problems, data privacy, potential bias, and academic integrity risk as challenges that need to be addressed.
32+Evidence (en-US, 8478ea551007): AI chatbots may not be very reliable or accurate, which could lead to misinformation or misleading students. Issues such as data privacy, potential biases in AI algorithms, and the risk of compromising academic integrity are also significant challenges that need to be addressed.
33+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:43:34.000Z
1634 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1735 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
36+privacy: For the XIPU AI platform, XJTLU's strategic framework sets an objective to establish ethical-use guidelines focusing on data privacy, bias mitigation, and transparency.
37+Evidence (en, 064b1f8e03af): Ethical AI Use: To establish guidelines for the ethical use of AI models, focusing on issues like data privacy, bias mitigation, and transparency, to ensure responsible AI practices.
38+Source Last-Modified: 2025-03-12T06:40:47.000Z

Aanpassingen claimen

5 Claimen registers

source_status

XJTLU's 2025-2028 Education + AI Strategic Framework sets an objective to develop and implement a robust AI policy framework for ethical AI development, deployment, and use; the source is a strategic framework rather than a standalone binding student AI policy.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen88%Bewijs1Talenen

academic_integrity

XJTLU's strategic framework says the university will continuously review and update policy and procedures as necessary for appropriate and inappropriate AI use by students.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen86%Bewijs1Talenen

privacy

For the XIPU AI platform, XJTLU's strategic framework sets an objective to establish ethical-use guidelines focusing on data privacy, bias mitigation, and transparency.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen86%Bewijs1Talenen

academic_integrity

XJTLU Library's GenAI citation guide advises that information provided by generative AI should always be checked and verified because it can be false, biased, out of date, or hallucinated.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen83%Bewijs1Talenen

teaching

XJTLU's official teaching resource on AI chatbots identifies reliability and accuracy problems, data privacy, potential bias, and academic integrity risk as challenges that need to be addressed.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen82%Bewijs1Talenen-US

Bronsnapshots

3 source attributions