Dziennik zmian

Xi'an Jiaotong Liverpool University

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Podsumowanie zmian

Aktualna świeżość publicznych rekordów i stan weryfikacji.

Xi'an Jiaotong Liverpool University currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 31 maj 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 5 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

Ta strona łączy wszystkie publiczne diffy wydań dla Xi'an Jiaotong Liverpool University. Indywidualne migawki wersji pozostają dostępne pod adresami URL specyficznymi dla danej wersji.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Właśnie wyodrębnione twierdzenia to dodania do trackeru i niekoniecznie są nowo opublikowane przez uniwersytet. Zmiany w migawce źródła pokazują zmiany sum kontrolnych dla tego samego URL źródłowego i same w sobie nie stanowią zmian polityki.

Kategorie różnic

Klasyfikacja semantyczna dla tej różnicy wersji.

Tekst polityki0Właśnie wyodrębnione5Dowód0Migawki źródłowe0Tekst źródłowy0Dodano źródło3Usunięto źródło0

Połączone diffy wydań

Zjednoczona różnica trackerów wygenerowana ze wszystkich publicznych migawek wydań dla tej uczelni.

Xi'an Jiaotong Liverpool University combined release różnica

Porównywanie public-release-20260526-003 z public-release-20260612-001.

+21-0
11 # Xi'an Jiaotong Liverpool University AI policy diff
22 ## Source attribution added
33 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
4+Source https://libguides.lib.xjtlu.edu.cn/Generative-AI/Citing-AIGC snapshot 5e42fa5bb69c602e69efc95f09c79b66e22b714c28c929dd7d29649789691f38
5+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:42:36.000Z
46 ## Source attribution added
57 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
8+Source https://www.xjtlu.edu.cn/en/study/departments/using-ai-for-teaching/using-ai-chatbot-for-teaching-version2-2 snapshot 8478ea551007a339b916b9499636e7597077a610b9bbf6d9596e9979bfb7eb24
9+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:43:34.000Z
610 ## Source attribution added
711 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
12+Source https://www.xjtlu.edu.cn/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/XJTLU-Education-AI-Strategic-Framework.pdf snapshot 064b1f8e03afc8d98409d304600d29e1f6647e1786960ae707c09397392927b7
13+Source Last-Modified: 2025-03-12T06:40:47.000Z
814 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
915 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
16+source_status: XJTLU's 2025-2028 Education + AI Strategic Framework sets an objective to develop and implement a robust AI policy framework for ethical AI development, deployment, and use; the source is a strategic framework rather than a standalone binding student AI policy.
17+Evidence (en, 064b1f8e03af): To develop and implement a robust AI policy framework that governs the ethical development, deployment, and use of AI technologies.
18+Source Last-Modified: 2025-03-12T06:40:47.000Z
1019 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1120 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
21+academic_integrity: XJTLU Library's GenAI citation guide advises that information provided by generative AI should always be checked and verified because it can be false, biased, out of date, or hallucinated.
22+Evidence (en, 5e42fa5bb69c): information provided by Generative AI should always be checked and verified, because GenAI can sometimes generate false information that may be false, biased, or out of date and does not accurately reflect reality, known as "AI hallucination".
23+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:42:36.000Z
1224 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1325 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
26+academic_integrity: XJTLU's strategic framework says the university will continuously review and update policy and procedures as necessary for appropriate and inappropriate AI use by students.
27+Evidence (en, 064b1f8e03af): To continuously review and update as necessary University policy and procedures with respect to the appropriate and inappropriate use of AI by students.
28+Source Last-Modified: 2025-03-12T06:40:47.000Z
1429 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1530 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
31+teaching: XJTLU's official teaching resource on AI chatbots identifies reliability and accuracy problems, data privacy, potential bias, and academic integrity risk as challenges that need to be addressed.
32+Evidence (en-US, 8478ea551007): AI chatbots may not be very reliable or accurate, which could lead to misinformation or misleading students. Issues such as data privacy, potential biases in AI algorithms, and the risk of compromising academic integrity are also significant challenges that need to be addressed.
33+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:43:34.000Z
1634 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1735 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
36+privacy: For the XIPU AI platform, XJTLU's strategic framework sets an objective to establish ethical-use guidelines focusing on data privacy, bias mitigation, and transparency.
37+Evidence (en, 064b1f8e03af): Ethical AI Use: To establish guidelines for the ethical use of AI models, focusing on issues like data privacy, bias mitigation, and transparency, to ensure responsible AI practices.
38+Source Last-Modified: 2025-03-12T06:40:47.000Z

Historia wydań

1 różnica publicznej publikacji

public-release-20260612-001

Porównanie z public-release-20260526-003.

Tekst polityki0Właśnie wyodrębnione5Migawki źródłowe0Tekst źródłowy0

Xi'an Jiaotong Liverpool University public-release-20260612-001 różnica

Porównywanie public-release-20260526-003 z public-release-20260612-001.

+21-0
11 # Xi'an Jiaotong Liverpool University AI policy diff
22 ## Source attribution added
33 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
4+Source https://libguides.lib.xjtlu.edu.cn/Generative-AI/Citing-AIGC snapshot 5e42fa5bb69c602e69efc95f09c79b66e22b714c28c929dd7d29649789691f38
5+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:42:36.000Z
46 ## Source attribution added
57 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
8+Source https://www.xjtlu.edu.cn/en/study/departments/using-ai-for-teaching/using-ai-chatbot-for-teaching-version2-2 snapshot 8478ea551007a339b916b9499636e7597077a610b9bbf6d9596e9979bfb7eb24
9+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:43:34.000Z
610 ## Source attribution added
711 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
12+Source https://www.xjtlu.edu.cn/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/XJTLU-Education-AI-Strategic-Framework.pdf snapshot 064b1f8e03afc8d98409d304600d29e1f6647e1786960ae707c09397392927b7
13+Source Last-Modified: 2025-03-12T06:40:47.000Z
814 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
915 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
16+source_status: XJTLU's 2025-2028 Education + AI Strategic Framework sets an objective to develop and implement a robust AI policy framework for ethical AI development, deployment, and use; the source is a strategic framework rather than a standalone binding student AI policy.
17+Evidence (en, 064b1f8e03af): To develop and implement a robust AI policy framework that governs the ethical development, deployment, and use of AI technologies.
18+Source Last-Modified: 2025-03-12T06:40:47.000Z
1019 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1120 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
21+academic_integrity: XJTLU Library's GenAI citation guide advises that information provided by generative AI should always be checked and verified because it can be false, biased, out of date, or hallucinated.
22+Evidence (en, 5e42fa5bb69c): information provided by Generative AI should always be checked and verified, because GenAI can sometimes generate false information that may be false, biased, or out of date and does not accurately reflect reality, known as "AI hallucination".
23+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:42:36.000Z
1224 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1325 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
26+academic_integrity: XJTLU's strategic framework says the university will continuously review and update policy and procedures as necessary for appropriate and inappropriate AI use by students.
27+Evidence (en, 064b1f8e03af): To continuously review and update as necessary University policy and procedures with respect to the appropriate and inappropriate use of AI by students.
28+Source Last-Modified: 2025-03-12T06:40:47.000Z
1429 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1530 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
31+teaching: XJTLU's official teaching resource on AI chatbots identifies reliability and accuracy problems, data privacy, potential bias, and academic integrity risk as challenges that need to be addressed.
32+Evidence (en-US, 8478ea551007): AI chatbots may not be very reliable or accurate, which could lead to misinformation or misleading students. Issues such as data privacy, potential biases in AI algorithms, and the risk of compromising academic integrity are also significant challenges that need to be addressed.
33+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-31T20:43:34.000Z
1634 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1735 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
36+privacy: For the XIPU AI platform, XJTLU's strategic framework sets an objective to establish ethical-use guidelines focusing on data privacy, bias mitigation, and transparency.
37+Evidence (en, 064b1f8e03af): Ethical AI Use: To establish guidelines for the ethical use of AI models, focusing on issues like data privacy, bias mitigation, and transparency, to ensure responsible AI practices.
38+Source Last-Modified: 2025-03-12T06:40:47.000Z

Zmiany twierdzeń

5 Twierdzenie rekordów

source_status

XJTLU's 2025-2028 Education + AI Strategic Framework sets an objective to develop and implement a robust AI policy framework for ethical AI development, deployment, and use; the source is a strategic framework rather than a standalone binding student AI policy.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność88%Dowód1Językien

academic_integrity

XJTLU's strategic framework says the university will continuously review and update policy and procedures as necessary for appropriate and inappropriate AI use by students.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność86%Dowód1Językien

privacy

For the XIPU AI platform, XJTLU's strategic framework sets an objective to establish ethical-use guidelines focusing on data privacy, bias mitigation, and transparency.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność86%Dowód1Językien

academic_integrity

XJTLU Library's GenAI citation guide advises that information provided by generative AI should always be checked and verified because it can be false, biased, out of date, or hallucinated.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność83%Dowód1Językien

teaching

XJTLU's official teaching resource on AI chatbots identifies reliability and accuracy problems, data privacy, potential bias, and academic integrity risk as challenges that need to be addressed.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność82%Dowód1Językien-US

Migawki źródłowe

3 source attributions