University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Taal
ENZHFRPLNL

Wijzigingslogboek

University of Twente

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldLaatst gecontroleerd15 mei 2026Laatst gewijzigd15 mei 2026Claims8Bronnen5Releaseregistraties0
UniversiteitspaginaOpenbaar JSONMaandrapportUniversiteitsindex

Samenvatting wijzigingen

Huidige actualiteit en beoordelingsstatus van openbare gegevens.

University of Twente currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 15 mei 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Deze pagina combineert alle openbare releasediffs voor University of Twente. Individuele releasesnapshots blijven beschikbaar via hun release-specifieke URL's.

Er zijn nog geen beleidverschillen tussen releases geregistreerd voor deze universiteit. De pagina houdt nog steeds bij welke bronnen onderbouwing bieden, officiële bronaanwijzingen, de beoordelingsstatus, de actualiteit van bronnen en openbare JSON voor ontdekking en citatie.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Zojuist geëxtraheerde beweringen zijn toevoegingen aan de tracker en zijn niet per se recent door de universiteit gepubliceerd. Wijzigingen in bron-snapshots tonen hashwijzigingen voor dezelfde bron-URL en zijn op zichzelf geen beleidswijzigingen.

Diff-categorieën

Semantische classificatie voor deze release diff.

Beleidstekst0Zojuist geëxtraheerd0Bewijs0Bronsnapshots0Bron tekst0Bron toegevoegd0Bron verwijderd0

Gecombineerd releasediff

Geünificeerde trackerdiff gegenereerd vanuit alle openbare releasesnapshots voor deze universiteit.

Universiteit of Twente combined release verschil

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+16-0
11 # University of Twente AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: UT's education PDF requires students to disclose AI use in an appendix when AI is used for an assignment, and states that unconsented and unacknowledged AI use should be considered academic misconduct.
3+Evidence (en, 8426f526e3e6): It is required that students mention the use of AI. Therefore, when any form of AI is used, the use of these tools should be included in the appendix... Students using AI, without the explicit consent of the instructor and acknowledgement of the tool in an appendix, should therefore be considered to have committed academic misconduct.
4+privacy: UT's AI dossier tells users not to include personal, student, research, confidential, or sensitive data in public AI tools.
5+Evidence (en-GB, de0cb0858c11): How should I handle data when using AI tools? Always assume your input may be stored externally. Never include personal data, student details, research data or confidential material in public AI tools.
6+teaching: UT's education PDF tells teachers that each assignment or group of assignments should make clear whether students may use AI and whether restrictions apply.
7+Evidence (en, 8426f526e3e6): With every assignment or group of assignments it should be clear if students are allowed to use AI and whether this is with restrictions. See below for options.
8+source_status: The University of Twente Executive Board has adopted an AI statement that frames AI use as a shared, responsible practice across education, research, and operations.
9+Evidence (en-GB, e339eacf3d7e): The Executive Board of the University of Twente has adopted a statement on artificial intelligence (AI). In this statement, the university highlights the importance of a shared and responsible use of AI within education, research, and operations.
10+ai_tool_treatment: For student assignments and theses, UT's AI dossier says AI tool use depends on the course and on policies set by the programme or lecturer.
11+Evidence (en-GB, de0cb0858c11): Can students use AI tools for assignments or theses? That depends on the course. Each programme or lecturer may have their own policy. When in doubt, ask your lecturer. Always use AI transparently and responsibly.
12+security_review: UT's AI dossier says the university is developing an AI Compliance Framework and instructs staff and researchers to report AI applications via the AI Office for appropriate measures under the AI Act.
13+Evidence (en-GB, de0cb0858c11): UT is developing an AI Compliance Framework to provide guidance on legal and regulatory matters, such as the European AI Act... Always report your AI application via the AI Office to ensure that the appropriate measures can be taken in line with the AI Act.
14+procurement: UT's AI dossier says users should seek Contract Management approval before accepting licence agreements for new AI applications or paid AI tools that may bind the university.
15+Evidence (en-GB, de0cb0858c11): Before using any new application or tool, please note that, according to the Use of Personal Applications Policy, it is not permitted to accept license agreements that are binding for the university without prior approval. This applies to both paid and unpaid licenses.
16+teaching: UT's AI and assessment guidance warns that AI detection software has limits and may raise privacy, confidentiality, and trustworthiness issues.
17+Evidence (en-GB, d2c50a3a0628): There are AI detection software, but in general, they have their limits and are not very reliable. There are also privacy, confidentiality, and other issues involved if the work of students or others is put in a system to check.

Geschiedenis releases

0 public release diffs

Aanpassingen claimen

8 Claimen registers

academic_integrity

UT's education PDF requires students to disclose AI use in an appendix when AI is used for an assignment, and states that unconsented and unacknowledged AI use should be considered academic misconduct.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen97%Bewijs1Talenen

privacy

UT's AI dossier tells users not to include personal, student, research, confidential, or sensitive data in public AI tools.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%Bewijs1Talenen-GB

teaching

UT's education PDF tells teachers that each assignment or group of assignments should make clear whether students may use AI and whether restrictions apply.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%Bewijs1Talenen

source_status

The University of Twente Executive Board has adopted an AI statement that frames AI use as a shared, responsible practice across education, research, and operations.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%Bewijs1Talenen-GB

ai_tool_treatment

For student assignments and theses, UT's AI dossier says AI tool use depends on the course and on policies set by the programme or lecturer.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen93%Bewijs1Talenen-GB

security_review

UT's AI dossier says the university is developing an AI Compliance Framework and instructs staff and researchers to report AI applications via the AI Office for appropriate measures under the AI Act.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen93%Bewijs1Talenen-GB

procurement

UT's AI dossier says users should seek Contract Management approval before accepting licence agreements for new AI applications or paid AI tools that may bind the university.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen92%Bewijs1Talenen-GB

teaching

UT's AI and assessment guidance warns that AI detection software has limits and may raise privacy, confidentiality, and trustworthiness issues.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen91%Bewijs1Talenen-GB

Bronsnapshots

5 source attributions