Change log

University of Twente

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Twente currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for University of Twente. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

University of Twente combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+16-0
11 # University of Twente AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: UT's education PDF requires students to disclose AI use in an appendix when AI is used for an assignment, and states that unconsented and unacknowledged AI use should be considered academic misconduct.
3+Evidence (en, 8426f526e3e6): It is required that students mention the use of AI. Therefore, when any form of AI is used, the use of these tools should be included in the appendix... Students using AI, without the explicit consent of the instructor and acknowledgement of the tool in an appendix, should therefore be considered to have committed academic misconduct.
4+privacy: UT's AI dossier tells users not to include personal, student, research, confidential, or sensitive data in public AI tools.
5+Evidence (en-GB, de0cb0858c11): How should I handle data when using AI tools? Always assume your input may be stored externally. Never include personal data, student details, research data or confidential material in public AI tools.
6+teaching: UT's education PDF tells teachers that each assignment or group of assignments should make clear whether students may use AI and whether restrictions apply.
7+Evidence (en, 8426f526e3e6): With every assignment or group of assignments it should be clear if students are allowed to use AI and whether this is with restrictions. See below for options.
8+source_status: The University of Twente Executive Board has adopted an AI statement that frames AI use as a shared, responsible practice across education, research, and operations.
9+Evidence (en-GB, e339eacf3d7e): The Executive Board of the University of Twente has adopted a statement on artificial intelligence (AI). In this statement, the university highlights the importance of a shared and responsible use of AI within education, research, and operations.
10+ai_tool_treatment: For student assignments and theses, UT's AI dossier says AI tool use depends on the course and on policies set by the programme or lecturer.
11+Evidence (en-GB, de0cb0858c11): Can students use AI tools for assignments or theses? That depends on the course. Each programme or lecturer may have their own policy. When in doubt, ask your lecturer. Always use AI transparently and responsibly.
12+security_review: UT's AI dossier says the university is developing an AI Compliance Framework and instructs staff and researchers to report AI applications via the AI Office for appropriate measures under the AI Act.
13+Evidence (en-GB, de0cb0858c11): UT is developing an AI Compliance Framework to provide guidance on legal and regulatory matters, such as the European AI Act... Always report your AI application via the AI Office to ensure that the appropriate measures can be taken in line with the AI Act.
14+procurement: UT's AI dossier says users should seek Contract Management approval before accepting licence agreements for new AI applications or paid AI tools that may bind the university.
15+Evidence (en-GB, de0cb0858c11): Before using any new application or tool, please note that, according to the Use of Personal Applications Policy, it is not permitted to accept license agreements that are binding for the university without prior approval. This applies to both paid and unpaid licenses.
16+teaching: UT's AI and assessment guidance warns that AI detection software has limits and may raise privacy, confidentiality, and trustworthiness issues.
17+Evidence (en-GB, d2c50a3a0628): There are AI detection software, but in general, they have their limits and are not very reliable. There are also privacy, confidentiality, and other issues involved if the work of students or others is put in a system to check.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

8 claim records

academic_integrity

UT's education PDF requires students to disclose AI use in an appendix when AI is used for an assignment, and states that unconsented and unacknowledged AI use should be considered academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

UT's AI dossier tells users not to include personal, student, research, confidential, or sensitive data in public AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

teaching

UT's education PDF tells teachers that each assignment or group of assignments should make clear whether students may use AI and whether restrictions apply.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

source_status

The University of Twente Executive Board has adopted an AI statement that frames AI use as a shared, responsible practice across education, research, and operations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

ai_tool_treatment

For student assignments and theses, UT's AI dossier says AI tool use depends on the course and on policies set by the programme or lecturer.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

security_review

UT's AI dossier says the university is developing an AI Compliance Framework and instructs staff and researchers to report AI applications via the AI Office for appropriate measures under the AI Act.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

procurement

UT's AI dossier says users should seek Contract Management approval before accepting licence agreements for new AI applications or paid AI tools that may bind the university.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

teaching

UT's AI and assessment guidance warns that AI detection software has limits and may raise privacy, confidentiality, and trustworthiness issues.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

Source snapshots

5 source attributions