Change log

University of Leeds

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 13, 2026Last changedMay 13, 2026Claims9Sources8Release records0

University page Public JSON Monthly report University index

University of Leeds currently has 9 source-backed claim records and 8 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 13, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for University of Leeds. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

11 # University of Leeds AI policy record
2+privacy: University of Leeds data-restriction guidance says certain data, including passwords, usernames, PII, sensitive or confidential material, University IP, and some copyright-protected or third-party data, must never be put into AI software.
3+Evidence (en, b144d346ae7e): Certain types of data must never be put into any AI software. These include: passwords and usernames; personally identifiable information (PII) or other sensitive or confidential material; any data related to University Intellectual Property; any data that is protected by Copyright, unless explicit permission for its use with AI tools has been obtained.
4+academic_integrity: University of Leeds assessment guidance says students can use generative AI to help learning but cannot use AI to generate or falsify work.
5+Evidence (en, 08bcf5f89c26): As a general principle, you can use generative AI to help you learn but cannot use AI to generate or falsify work.
6+ai_tool_treatment: University of Leeds assessment guidance uses a red, amber, and green traffic-light system to indicate how GenAI should be used in taught student assessments.
7+Evidence (en, 08bcf5f89c26): The University of Leeds uses a three-tiered traffic light system to indicate how Gen AI should be used in assessments.
8+academic_integrity: University of Leeds GenAI acknowledgement guidance says students must acknowledge GenAI use in an Acknowledgements or Declarations section when it functionally assisted their academic work.
9+Evidence (en, 25ccd5aed509): You must acknowledge the use of Gen AI in an 'Acknowledgements' or 'Declarations' section when you have used it as a functional tool to assist you as you were creating any academic work.
10+research: University of Leeds postgraduate researcher guidance says PGRs must not use GenAI to write their thesis, transfer report, or other work, falsify work, or breach research assessment and examination guidance.
11+Evidence (en, dbcc24137898): You must not use Gen AI to write your thesis, transfer report or other work, falsify work or breach guidelines for the research assessment and examination processes.
12+teaching: In Leeds taught-student assessment guidance, amber-category assessments permit GenAI only in an assistive role as specified by the module tutor and required by the assessment.
13+Evidence (en, fbcaefde265f): Under this category, you are permitted to use Gen AI tools in an assistive role as specified by the module tutor and required by the assessment.
14+ai_tool_treatment: University of Leeds staff guidance says all material wholly or substantially generated using an AI tool should be declared clearly in the document in which it occurs.
15+Evidence (en, bcf18d76845f): All material that is wholly or substantially generated using an AI tool should be declared clearly in the document in which it occurs, whether the document is for internal or external use.
16+academic_integrity: University of Leeds Library guidance says unpermitted GenAI use or failure to correctly acknowledge allowed GenAI use in assessment will be classed as academic misconduct.
17+Evidence (en, b4082eccc9d0): If you are found to have used generative AI when you weren't supposed to, this will be classed as academic misconduct. If you do not correctly acknowledge the use of generative AI, this will be classed as academic misconduct.
18+security_review: University of Leeds GenAI tools guidance says Copilot should be used for work purposes, including assessed work, unless there is a good reason why it cannot be used.
19+Evidence (en, 89fcf87b0748): For work purposes, including assessed work, Copilot should be used unless there is a good reason why it can't be.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

9 claim records

privacy

University of Leeds data-restriction guidance says certain data, including passwords, usernames, PII, sensitive or confidential material, University IP, and some copyright-protected or third-party data, must never be put into AI software.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Leeds assessment guidance says students can use generative AI to help learning but cannot use AI to generate or falsify work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Leeds assessment guidance uses a red, amber, and green traffic-light system to indicate how GenAI should be used in taught student assessments.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Leeds GenAI acknowledgement guidance says students must acknowledge GenAI use in an Acknowledgements or Declarations section when it functionally assisted their academic work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

research

University of Leeds postgraduate researcher guidance says PGRs must not use GenAI to write their thesis, transfer report, or other work, falsify work, or breach research assessment and examination guidance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

In Leeds taught-student assessment guidance, amber-category assessments permit GenAI only in an assistive role as specified by the module tutor and required by the assessment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Leeds staff guidance says all material wholly or substantially generated using an AI tool should be declared clearly in the document in which it occurs.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Leeds Library guidance says unpermitted GenAI use or failure to correctly acknowledge allowed GenAI use in assessment will be classed as academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

University of Leeds GenAI tools guidance says Copilot should be used for work purposes, including assessed work, unless there is a good reason why it cannot be used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen