public-release-20260715-005
Vergeleken met public-release-20260714-002.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München public-release-20260715-005 verschil
public-release-20260714-002 vergelijken met public-release-20260715-005.
Wijzigingslogboek
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Huidige actualiteit en beoordelingsstatus van openbare gegevens.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 19 jul 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
Deze pagina combineert alle openbare releasediffs voor Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. Individuele releasesnapshots blijven beschikbaar via hun release-specifieke URL's.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Zojuist geëxtraheerde beweringen zijn toevoegingen aan de tracker en zijn niet per se recent door de universiteit gepubliceerd. Wijzigingen in bron-snapshots tonen hashwijzigingen voor dezelfde bron-URL en zijn op zichzelf geen beleidswijzigingen.
Semantische classificatie voor deze release diff.
Geünificeerde trackerdiff gegenereerd vanuit alle openbare releasesnapshots voor deze universiteit.
public-release-20260714-002 vergelijken met public-release-20260715-005.
1 verschil openbare publicatie
Vergeleken met public-release-20260714-002.
public-release-20260714-002 vergelijken met public-release-20260715-005.
7 Claimen registers
Microsoft Copilot is listed for Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
LMU IfKW student guidance says AI may be used in assessments only with explicit teacher permission; if no explicit permission is given, students must assume AI use is not allowed.
LMU IfKW guidance says material containing personal information must not be entered into AI systems without consent and unless German or EU data-protection standards are met.
LMU IfKW guidance treats verbatim or minimally changed AI-generated text without proper attribution as plagiarism, and says significant unattributed AI-generated text in assessed work can receive grade 5 (failed).
LMU Medical Faculty dissertation guidance says doctoral authors must disclose when, where, and to what extent AI was used, name AI as an aid in the affidavit, and mark sections where AI was used for creation or editing.
LMU IfKW guidance says permitted AI use in assessed work, including preliminary tasks, must be completely and appropriately documented.
LMU teaching guidance recommends adapting e-exam questions for ChatGPT-era assessment, including tasks that require critical reflection on ChatGPT limitations rather than simple knowledge or comprehension questions.
5 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at 12 mei 2026, 14:09
official_guidance Tracker checked at 15 jul 2026, 22:07
official_guidance Tracker checked at 15 jul 2026, 22:07
official_guidance Tracker checked at 12 mei 2026, 14:09
official_guidance Tracker checked at 12 mei 2026, 14:09