public-release-20260715-005
Vergeleken met public-release-20260714-002.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg public-release-20260715-005 verschil
public-release-20260714-002 vergelijken met public-release-20260715-005.
Wijzigingslogboek
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Huidige actualiteit en beoordelingsstatus van openbare gegevens.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 19 jul 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
Deze pagina combineert alle openbare releasediffs voor Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg. Individuele releasesnapshots blijven beschikbaar via hun release-specifieke URL's.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Zojuist geëxtraheerde beweringen zijn toevoegingen aan de tracker en zijn niet per se recent door de universiteit gepubliceerd. Wijzigingen in bron-snapshots tonen hashwijzigingen voor dezelfde bron-URL en zijn op zichzelf geen beleidswijzigingen.
Semantische classificatie voor deze release diff.
Geünificeerde trackerdiff gegenereerd vanuit alle openbare releasesnapshots voor deze universiteit.
public-release-20260714-002 vergelijken met public-release-20260715-005.
1 verschil openbare publicatie
Vergeleken met public-release-20260714-002.
public-release-20260714-002 vergelijken met public-release-20260715-005.
7 Claimen registers
HAWKI is listed for Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
FAU's central exams page states that if AI is not expressly permitted in exams, especially written papers, it is an unauthorized aid and can lead to the exam being failed for deception.
FAU describes its AI-in-teaching guidelines as orientation and inspiration and states that they do not have Satzungscharakter; teaching and exam-related rules remain part of the individual study and examination regulations.
FAU guidance says instructors are responsible for clear AI-use rules in teaching activities, especially exams, and that students must disclose generative AI use according to the relevant course rules.
FAU guidance tells users to choose AI tools with data-protection compliance and not to enter personal, confidential, copyright-protected, or personal data into AI systems.
FAU's AI-in-teaching guidance says examiners must individually determine and announce whether and how AI-supported aids may be used, and students must disclose the aids used.
FAU frames generative AI as support for innovative teaching practices that can strengthen didactic value while preserving academic integrity.
4 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at 15 mei 2026, 18:24
official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 jul 2026, 03:22
official_pdf Tracker checked at 15 mei 2026, 18:26
official_guidance Tracker checked at 15 mei 2026, 18:23