University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Bahasa
ENZHFRPL

Log perubahan

University of East London

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenTerakhir diperiksa23 Mei 2026Terkini diubah23 Mei 2026Tuntutan4Sumber2Keluaran terkinipublic-release-20260526-003Rekod keluaran1
Halaman universitiJSON awamLaporan bulananIndeks universiti

Ringkasan perubahan

Kesegaran rekod awam semasa dan keadaan semakan.

University of East London currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 23 Mei 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 4 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

Halaman ini menggabungkan semua perbezaan pelepasan awam untuk University of East London. Snapshot pelepasan individu kekal boleh diakses dari URL khusus pelepasan mereka.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Tuntutan diekstrak baharu adalah penambahan penjejak dan tidak semestinya diterbitkan baru-baru ini oleh universiti. Perubahan snapshot sumber menunjukkan perubahan hesh untuk URL sumber yang sama dan bukan merupakan perubahan dasar secara langsung.

Kategori perbezaan

Klasifikasi semantik untuk perbezaan keluaran ini.

Teks dasar0Diekstrak baharu4Bukti0Snapshot sumber0Teks sumber0Sumber ditambah2Sumber dialih keluar0

Perbezaan pelepasan gabungan

Perbezaan penjejak bersatu dijana daripada semua snapshot pelepasan awam untuk universiti ini.

Universiti of East London combined release perbezaan

Membandingkan public-release-20260526-001 dengan public-release-20260526-003.

+16-0
11 # University of East London AI policy diff
22 ## Source attribution added
33 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
4+Source https://www.uel.ac.uk/about/governance/general-policies/generative-artificial-intelligence-usage-policy snapshot 3f445bb16721b1abed489e3547b71c0d6fb45c5b9a3c0b88e6f9a55e5d5bc108
5+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
46 ## Source attribution added
57 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
8+Source https://www.uel.ac.uk/about/governance/manual-general-regulations/academic-integrity-academic-misconduct snapshot 1becfca5271f6e6f0e02cc957bf5b02ffa74c6369bd94ace2f9de0295a1edcfc
9+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
610 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
711 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
12+security_review: UEL's GenAI usage policy says AI systems must prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols, while human checks should monitor impactful AI decisions.
13+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): AI systems must be designed and implemented in ways that prioritise user safety and ethical standards. Clear documentation must be provided to ensure transparent and explainable AI. Robust security protocols must be implemented to protect AI systems from malicious attacks and unauthorised access.
14+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
815 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
916 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
17+academic_integrity: UEL's academic misconduct rules define Generative AI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain an unfair advantage by producing content submitted as the student's own original work.
18+Evidence (en, 1becfca5271f): Generative AI: The use of generative artificial Intelligence tools to gain an unfair advantage. Such as ChatGPT, Bing Char or DALL-E to produce content that is then submitted as your own original work.
19+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
1020 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1121 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
22+ai_tool_treatment: The University of East London's Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy applies to staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.
23+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): Scope: The policy applies to all staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates of UEL who engage in the development, deployment, or use of Gen AI technologies.
24+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
1225 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1326 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
27+ai_tool_treatment: UEL's GenAI usage policy frames responsible use around transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
28+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): This policy provides a framework for the responsible and ethical use of Generative AI (Gen AI) at the University of East London (UEL). It emphasises transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
29+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z

Sejarah keluaran

1 perbezaan pelepasan awam

public-release-20260526-003

Dibandingkan dengan public-release-20260526-001.

Teks dasar0Diekstrak baharu4Snapshot sumber0Teks sumber0
Perbezaan keluaranPerbezaan JSON

Universiti of East London public-release-20260526-003 perbezaan

Membandingkan public-release-20260526-001 dengan public-release-20260526-003.

+16-0
11 # University of East London AI policy diff
22 ## Source attribution added
33 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
4+Source https://www.uel.ac.uk/about/governance/general-policies/generative-artificial-intelligence-usage-policy snapshot 3f445bb16721b1abed489e3547b71c0d6fb45c5b9a3c0b88e6f9a55e5d5bc108
5+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
46 ## Source attribution added
57 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
8+Source https://www.uel.ac.uk/about/governance/manual-general-regulations/academic-integrity-academic-misconduct snapshot 1becfca5271f6e6f0e02cc957bf5b02ffa74c6369bd94ace2f9de0295a1edcfc
9+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
610 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
711 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
12+security_review: UEL's GenAI usage policy says AI systems must prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols, while human checks should monitor impactful AI decisions.
13+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): AI systems must be designed and implemented in ways that prioritise user safety and ethical standards. Clear documentation must be provided to ensure transparent and explainable AI. Robust security protocols must be implemented to protect AI systems from malicious attacks and unauthorised access.
14+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
815 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
916 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
17+academic_integrity: UEL's academic misconduct rules define Generative AI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain an unfair advantage by producing content submitted as the student's own original work.
18+Evidence (en, 1becfca5271f): Generative AI: The use of generative artificial Intelligence tools to gain an unfair advantage. Such as ChatGPT, Bing Char or DALL-E to produce content that is then submitted as your own original work.
19+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
1020 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1121 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
22+ai_tool_treatment: The University of East London's Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy applies to staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.
23+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): Scope: The policy applies to all staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates of UEL who engage in the development, deployment, or use of Gen AI technologies.
24+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
1225 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1326 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
27+ai_tool_treatment: UEL's GenAI usage policy frames responsible use around transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
28+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): This policy provides a framework for the responsible and ethical use of Generative AI (Gen AI) at the University of East London (UEL). It emphasises transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
29+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z

Perubahan tuntutan

4 rekod Tuntut

ai_tool_treatment

The University of East London's Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy applies to staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan96%Bukti1Bahasaen

ai_tool_treatment

UEL's GenAI usage policy frames responsible use around transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%Bukti1Bahasaen

academic_integrity

UEL's academic misconduct rules define Generative AI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain an unfair advantage by producing content submitted as the student's own original work.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan93%Bukti1Bahasaen

security_review

UEL's GenAI usage policy says AI systems must prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols, while human checks should monitor impactful AI decisions.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan91%Bukti1Bahasaen

Snapshot sumber

2 source attributions