research
The PPGRI page places the Unifesp generative-AI guidelines and IAG declaration alongside qualification, dissertation, and repository-deposit guidance for its postgraduate students.
Change log
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 20, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
0 public release diffs
5 claim records
The PPGRI page places the Unifesp generative-AI guidelines and IAG declaration alongside qualification, dissertation, and repository-deposit guidance for its postgraduate students.
The EPE postgraduate chamber page asks students, in light of Resolution 17/2025, to sign the PROPGPQ AI-use declaration via Gov.br and include it in the SEI process for the Unifesp institutional repository.
Unifesp states that researchers are responsible for critically reviewing texts, results, code, or images produced by generative-AI systems for correctness, coherence, originality, citation/reference compliance, and intellectual-property respect.
For final documents submitted for evaluation at Unifesp or sent for publication, the generative-AI guidelines require an explicit declaration about the use of generative AI tools, including how the tool was used.
Unifesp's Resolution 17/2025 establishes guidelines for use of generative artificial intelligence in research and postgraduate work, with the stated aim of responsible and transparent use in scientific and academic production.
3 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 2:25 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 2:26 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 2:27 PM