University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Bahasa
ENZHFRPL

Log perubahan

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenTerakhir diperiksa11 Mei 2026Terkini diubah11 Mei 2026Tuntutan4Sumber3Rekod keluaran0
Halaman universitiJSON awamLaporan bulananIndeks universiti

Ringkasan perubahan

Kesegaran rekod awam semasa dan keadaan semakan.

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 11 Mei 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Halaman ini menggabungkan semua perbezaan pelepasan awam untuk University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). Snapshot pelepasan individu kekal boleh diakses dari URL khusus pelepasan mereka.

Belum ada baris perbezaan dasar antara pelepasan yang direkodkan untuk universiti ini. Halaman masih menjejak tuntutan disokong sumber semasa, atribusi rasmi sumber, keadaan semakan, kesegaran sumber, dan JSON awam untuk penemuan dan petikan.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Tuntutan diekstrak baharu adalah penambahan penjejak dan tidak semestinya diterbitkan baru-baru ini oleh universiti. Perubahan snapshot sumber menunjukkan perubahan hesh untuk URL sumber yang sama dan bukan merupakan perubahan dasar secara langsung.

Kategori perbezaan

Klasifikasi semantik untuk perbezaan keluaran ini.

Teks dasar0Diekstrak baharu0Bukti0Snapshot sumber0Teks sumber0Sumber ditambah0Sumber dialih keluar0

Perbezaan pelepasan gabungan

Perbezaan penjejak bersatu dijana daripada semua snapshot pelepasan awam untuk universiti ini.

Universiti of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) combined release perbezaan

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+8-0
11 # University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: UCLA Academic Senate guidance quotes the Student Conduct Code requirement that submissions must be the student’s own work or clearly acknowledge the source, and says that unless an instructor indicates otherwise, use of ChatGPT or other AI tools for course assignments is akin to receiving assistance from another person.
3+Evidence (en, 168a58d01102): The UCLA Student Conduct Code states, “Unless otherwise specified by the faculty member, all submissions, whether in draft or final form, to meet course requirements (including a paper, project, exam, computer program, oral presentation, or other work) must either be the Student’s own work, or must clearly acknowledge the source.” Unless an instructor indicates otherwise, the use of ChatGPT or other AI tools for course assignments is akin to receiving assistance from another person
4+privacy: UCLA DTS guidance says users may not input FERPA-protected student information, HIPPA/HIPAA-protected health data, employee personnel/performance data, unpublished research/IP/grant proposals, or export-controlled or restricted data into AI tools unless explicitly approved in a secure environment.
5+Evidence (en, c791d23ea915): Users may not input the following into AI tools unless explicitly approved in a secure environment: ( any questions regarding the below, please use [email protected] as the intake email for your questions) FERPA-protected student information (IDs, grades, coursework, etc) – UCLA Registrar FERPA Policy HIPPA-protected health data – UCLA Health HIPAA Notice Employee personnel/performance data – UC IS-3 Information Security Policy Unpublished research, IP, or grant proposals – UC Copyright & IP Policy Export-controlled or restricted data – UCLA Export Control Guidance
6+ai_tool_treatment: UCLA DTS AI guidance lists a subset of available generative AI tools including Microsoft Copilot and M365 Copilot, Google Gemini, OpenAI ChatGPT Enterprise, Google Notebook LM, AWS Bedrock models, and Zoom AI Companion.
7+Evidence (en, c791d23ea915): Please visit the linked page for most up to date tools, a subset of which is listed below: Microsoft Copilot & M365 Copilot Google Gemini (and Gemini for Workspace) OpenAI ChatGPT Enterprise Google Notebook LM AWS Bedrock models (Amazon Q, PartyRock, Claude, LLaMA, etc.) Zoom AI Companion (Education license)
8+teaching: UCLA Academic Senate guidance encourages instructors to clarify and communicate expectations to students and to consider incorporating academic integrity policies into the syllabus.
9+Evidence (en, 168a58d01102): Instructors are encouraged to clarify and communicate expectations to students • Consider incorporating academic integrity policies into your syllabus

Sejarah keluaran

0 public release diffs

Perubahan tuntutan

4 rekod Tuntut

academic_integrity

UCLA Academic Senate guidance quotes the Student Conduct Code requirement that submissions must be the student’s own work or clearly acknowledge the source, and says that unless an instructor indicates otherwise, use of ChatGPT or other AI tools for course assignments is akin to receiving assistance from another person.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%Bukti1Bahasaen

privacy

UCLA DTS guidance says users may not input FERPA-protected student information, HIPPA/HIPAA-protected health data, employee personnel/performance data, unpublished research/IP/grant proposals, or export-controlled or restricted data into AI tools unless explicitly approved in a secure environment.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%Bukti1Bahasaen

ai_tool_treatment

UCLA DTS AI guidance lists a subset of available generative AI tools including Microsoft Copilot and M365 Copilot, Google Gemini, OpenAI ChatGPT Enterprise, Google Notebook LM, AWS Bedrock models, and Zoom AI Companion.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan92%Bukti1Bahasaen

teaching

UCLA Academic Senate guidance encourages instructors to clarify and communicate expectations to students and to consider incorporating academic integrity policies into the syllabus.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan92%Bukti1Bahasaen

Snapshot sumber

3 source attributions