University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Bahasa
ENZHFRPL

Log perubahan

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB)

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenTerakhir diperiksa14 Mei 2026Terkini diubah14 Mei 2026Tuntutan5Sumber1Rekod keluaran0
Halaman universitiJSON awamLaporan bulananIndeks universiti

Ringkasan perubahan

Kesegaran rekod awam semasa dan keadaan semakan.

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB) currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: 14 Mei 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Halaman ini menggabungkan semua perbezaan pelepasan awam untuk Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB). Snapshot pelepasan individu kekal boleh diakses dari URL khusus pelepasan mereka.

Belum ada baris perbezaan dasar antara pelepasan yang direkodkan untuk universiti ini. Halaman masih menjejak tuntutan disokong sumber semasa, atribusi rasmi sumber, keadaan semakan, kesegaran sumber, dan JSON awam untuk penemuan dan petikan.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Tuntutan diekstrak baharu adalah penambahan penjejak dan tidak semestinya diterbitkan baru-baru ini oleh universiti. Perubahan snapshot sumber menunjukkan perubahan hesh untuk URL sumber yang sama dan bukan merupakan perubahan dasar secara langsung.

Kategori perbezaan

Klasifikasi semantik untuk perbezaan keluaran ini.

Teks dasar0Diekstrak baharu0Bukti0Snapshot sumber0Teks sumber0Sumber ditambah0Sumber dialih keluar0

Perbezaan pelepasan gabungan

Perbezaan penjejak bersatu dijana daripada semua snapshot pelepasan awam untuk universiti ini.

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB) combined release perbezaan

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB) AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: IIT Bombay's Department of Humanities and Social Sciences AI policy says it specifically addresses AI use for teaching, research, and administration in HSS; users are responsible for academic and professional integrity, and human verification of AI-content accuracy is mandatory for permissible use.
3+Evidence (en, e66d054a2b03): This policy specifically addresses the use of AI for Teaching, Research and Administration in the Department of HSS, IIT Bombay. The use of AI according to the strict demands of academic and professional integrity is the ultimate responsibility of the user/author/writer, whether one is faculty, researcher, student or staff. Human verification of the accuracy of AI content by the user of AI is mandatory in all cases of permissible use.
4+academic_integrity: The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy requires explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor for AI use, except for basic grammar and spell-check functions, and says grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged.
5+Evidence (en, e66d054a2b03): Explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor is mandatory for the use of AI, except for the use of basic functions like grammar and spell-check. For the latter, Institute subscribed and recommended (if any) AI platforms must be used. However, use of grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged (see Point No.11).
6+teaching: The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says AI use without human verification is not permissible for tasks involving evaluation or assessment of students, staff, or researchers, and AI detection tools cannot be the sole criterion for disciplinary action without human verification.
7+Evidence (en, e66d054a2b03): Use of AI without human verification is not permissible for any task that involves evaluation or assessment of a student, staff or researcher, including (but not limited to) assessment of student submissions by faculty, of staff by Department functionaries, and screening of applications for admission, recruitment and promotion. AI detection tools (such as Turnitin) cannot be used as the sole criterion for disciplinary action without human verification.
8+privacy: The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says users must not feed non-public, institutional, sensitive, or personally identifiable information into AI platforms, and it says AI transcription of interview and survey data is not permissible when confidentiality, anonymity, consent, or DPDP Act obligations would be affected.
9+Evidence (en, e66d054a2b03): In the interest of intellectual property rights, privacy and confidentiality, we must not feed any information into AI platforms that must not be available in the public domain, including institutional and sensitive material. It is mandatory to abide by the regulations of the Institute Ethics Committee (IEC) or Review Board (IRB) regarding collection of data from human respondents for maintaining confidentiality, anonymity and consent requirements. Therefore, use of AI for transcription of interviews and survey data is not permissible. Any data containing personally identifiable information must not be uploaded in any platform, including AI platforms
10+research: The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says permissible AI use should be acknowledged with proper citation in teaching materials and research outputs, including prompts, AI tools used, and clear demarcation of AI-generated or AI-aided content; HSS dissertations and research reports submitted for evaluation must include an AI use or non-use declaration.
11+Evidence (en, e66d054a2b03): Use of AI within permissible limits should be duly acknowledged with proper citation in all types of teaching materials and research outputs. Citation must include: (a) prompts used, (b) AI tools used, and (c) clear demarcation of the content/output generated by or with the aid of AI. Along with specific citations (see point No. 11), all dissertations and research reports submitted for evaluation in the Department of HSS must include a declaration of AI use/non-use by the student/researcher as per IIT Bombay requirement.

Sejarah keluaran

0 public release diffs

Perubahan tuntutan

5 rekod Tuntut

ai_tool_treatment

IIT Bombay's Department of Humanities and Social Sciences AI policy says it specifically addresses AI use for teaching, research, and administration in HSS; users are responsible for academic and professional integrity, and human verification of AI-content accuracy is mandatory for permissible use.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan95%Bukti1Bahasaen

academic_integrity

The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy requires explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor for AI use, except for basic grammar and spell-check functions, and says grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan95%Bukti1Bahasaen

teaching

The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says AI use without human verification is not permissible for tasks involving evaluation or assessment of students, staff, or researchers, and AI detection tools cannot be the sole criterion for disciplinary action without human verification.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan95%Bukti1Bahasaen

privacy

The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says users must not feed non-public, institutional, sensitive, or personally identifiable information into AI platforms, and it says AI transcription of interview and survey data is not permissible when confidentiality, anonymity, consent, or DPDP Act obligations would be affected.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%Bukti1Bahasaen

research

The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says permissible AI use should be acknowledged with proper citation in teaching materials and research outputs, including prompts, AI tools used, and clear demarcation of AI-generated or AI-aided content; HSS dissertations and research reports submitted for evaluation must include an AI use or non-use declaration.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%Bukti1Bahasaen

Snapshot sumber

1 penisahan sumber