University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Język
ENZHFRPL

Dziennik zmian

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB)

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaOstatnio sprawdzono14 maj 2026Ostatnio zmieniono14 maj 2026Twierdzenia5Źródła1Rejestry wydań0
Strona uczelniPubliczne JSONRaport miesięcznyIndeks uczelni

Podsumowanie zmian

Aktualna świeżość publicznych rekordów i stan weryfikacji.

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB) currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: 14 maj 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Ta strona łączy wszystkie publiczne diffy wydań dla Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB). Indywidualne migawki wersji pozostają dostępne pod adresami URL specyficznymi dla danej wersji.

Dla tej uczelni nie zarejestrowano jeszcze różnic między kolejnymi wydaniami. Strona nadal śledzi bieżące twierdzenia poparte źródłami, oficjalne przypisania źródeł, stan przeglądu, aktualność źródeł oraz publicznie dostępny JSON na potrzeby wyszukiwania i cytowania.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Właśnie wyodrębnione twierdzenia to dodania do trackeru i niekoniecznie są nowo opublikowane przez uniwersytet. Zmiany w migawce źródła pokazują zmiany sum kontrolnych dla tego samego URL źródłowego i same w sobie nie stanowią zmian polityki.

Kategorie różnic

Klasyfikacja semantyczna dla tej różnicy wersji.

Tekst polityki0Właśnie wyodrębnione0Dowód0Migawki źródłowe0Tekst źródłowy0Dodano źródło0Usunięto źródło0

Połączone diffy wydań

Zjednoczona różnica trackerów wygenerowana ze wszystkich publicznych migawek wydań dla tej uczelni.

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB) combined release różnica

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB) AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: IIT Bombay's Department of Humanities and Social Sciences AI policy says it specifically addresses AI use for teaching, research, and administration in HSS; users are responsible for academic and professional integrity, and human verification of AI-content accuracy is mandatory for permissible use.
3+Evidence (en, e66d054a2b03): This policy specifically addresses the use of AI for Teaching, Research and Administration in the Department of HSS, IIT Bombay. The use of AI according to the strict demands of academic and professional integrity is the ultimate responsibility of the user/author/writer, whether one is faculty, researcher, student or staff. Human verification of the accuracy of AI content by the user of AI is mandatory in all cases of permissible use.
4+academic_integrity: The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy requires explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor for AI use, except for basic grammar and spell-check functions, and says grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged.
5+Evidence (en, e66d054a2b03): Explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor is mandatory for the use of AI, except for the use of basic functions like grammar and spell-check. For the latter, Institute subscribed and recommended (if any) AI platforms must be used. However, use of grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged (see Point No.11).
6+teaching: The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says AI use without human verification is not permissible for tasks involving evaluation or assessment of students, staff, or researchers, and AI detection tools cannot be the sole criterion for disciplinary action without human verification.
7+Evidence (en, e66d054a2b03): Use of AI without human verification is not permissible for any task that involves evaluation or assessment of a student, staff or researcher, including (but not limited to) assessment of student submissions by faculty, of staff by Department functionaries, and screening of applications for admission, recruitment and promotion. AI detection tools (such as Turnitin) cannot be used as the sole criterion for disciplinary action without human verification.
8+privacy: The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says users must not feed non-public, institutional, sensitive, or personally identifiable information into AI platforms, and it says AI transcription of interview and survey data is not permissible when confidentiality, anonymity, consent, or DPDP Act obligations would be affected.
9+Evidence (en, e66d054a2b03): In the interest of intellectual property rights, privacy and confidentiality, we must not feed any information into AI platforms that must not be available in the public domain, including institutional and sensitive material. It is mandatory to abide by the regulations of the Institute Ethics Committee (IEC) or Review Board (IRB) regarding collection of data from human respondents for maintaining confidentiality, anonymity and consent requirements. Therefore, use of AI for transcription of interviews and survey data is not permissible. Any data containing personally identifiable information must not be uploaded in any platform, including AI platforms
10+research: The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says permissible AI use should be acknowledged with proper citation in teaching materials and research outputs, including prompts, AI tools used, and clear demarcation of AI-generated or AI-aided content; HSS dissertations and research reports submitted for evaluation must include an AI use or non-use declaration.
11+Evidence (en, e66d054a2b03): Use of AI within permissible limits should be duly acknowledged with proper citation in all types of teaching materials and research outputs. Citation must include: (a) prompts used, (b) AI tools used, and (c) clear demarcation of the content/output generated by or with the aid of AI. Along with specific citations (see point No. 11), all dissertations and research reports submitted for evaluation in the Department of HSS must include a declaration of AI use/non-use by the student/researcher as per IIT Bombay requirement.

Historia wydań

0 public release diffs

Zmiany twierdzeń

5 Twierdzenie rekordów

ai_tool_treatment

IIT Bombay's Department of Humanities and Social Sciences AI policy says it specifically addresses AI use for teaching, research, and administration in HSS; users are responsible for academic and professional integrity, and human verification of AI-content accuracy is mandatory for permissible use.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność95%Dowód1Językien

academic_integrity

The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy requires explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor for AI use, except for basic grammar and spell-check functions, and says grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność95%Dowód1Językien

teaching

The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says AI use without human verification is not permissible for tasks involving evaluation or assessment of students, staff, or researchers, and AI detection tools cannot be the sole criterion for disciplinary action without human verification.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność95%Dowód1Językien

privacy

The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says users must not feed non-public, institutional, sensitive, or personally identifiable information into AI platforms, and it says AI transcription of interview and survey data is not permissible when confidentiality, anonymity, consent, or DPDP Act obligations would be affected.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność94%Dowód1Językien

research

The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says permissible AI use should be acknowledged with proper citation in teaching materials and research outputs, including prompts, AI tools used, and clear demarcation of AI-generated or AI-aided content; HSS dissertations and research reports submitted for evaluation must include an AI use or non-use declaration.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność94%Dowód1Językien

Migawki źródłowe

1 przypisanie źródła