Log perubahan

Graz University of Technology

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Ringkasan perubahan

Kesegaran rekod awam semasa dan keadaan semakan.

Graz University of Technology currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 16 Mei 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Halaman ini menggabungkan semua perbezaan pelepasan awam untuk Graz University of Technology. Snapshot pelepasan individu kekal boleh diakses dari URL khusus pelepasan mereka.

Belum ada baris perbezaan dasar antara pelepasan yang direkodkan untuk universiti ini. Halaman masih menjejak tuntutan disokong sumber semasa, atribusi rasmi sumber, keadaan semakan, kesegaran sumber, dan JSON awam untuk penemuan dan petikan.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Tuntutan diekstrak baharu adalah penambahan penjejak dan tidak semestinya diterbitkan baru-baru ini oleh universiti. Perubahan snapshot sumber menunjukkan perubahan hesh untuk URL sumber yang sama dan bukan merupakan perubahan dasar secara langsung.

Kategori perbezaan

Klasifikasi semantik untuk perbezaan keluaran ini.

Teks dasar0Diekstrak baharu0Bukti0Snapshot sumber0Teks sumber0Sumber ditambah0Sumber dialih keluar0

Perbezaan pelepasan gabungan

Perbezaan penjejak bersatu dijana daripada semua snapshot pelepasan awam untuk universiti ini.

Graz University of Technology combined release perbezaan

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Graz University of Technology AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: TU Graz treats AI tools in examinations as unauthorized aids unless they are explicitly permitted, and the public teaching page says unpermitted AI use in assessment can make an examination attempt invalid due to cheating.
3+Evidence (en, b947a55eb873): AI tools during an examination are considered unauthorised in accordance with the section of the statutes on scientific and artistic integrity unless they have been explicitly permitted.
4+teaching: TU Graz says teaching staff decide whether and which AI-supported tools may be used in each course or thesis, with only spell-checking, translation, and stylistic-grammatical improvement generally permitted for students absent broader authorization.
5+Evidence (en, b947a55eb873): Students may generally use AI-based tools and Large Language Models (LLMs) such as DeepL, Grammarly and LanguageTool exclusively for spell-checking, translation, and stylistic-grammatical improvement of their own texts.
6+research: TU Graz's researcher guide explicitly encourages researchers to integrate AI into research processes while applying the AI-TU rule: analyse data, interpret results critically, truth-check results, and use results responsibly.
7+Evidence (en, 24e5ba177d7a): TU Graz researchers are explicitly encouraged to integrate AI into their research processes. As the field is changing so rapidly, this guideline is designed as a "living document" and is intended to outline principles for the use of AI applications rather than provide a list of specific tools.
8+privacy: TU Graz guidance requires transparent labelling of AI-supported tool use where applicable and cautions against entering personal, confidential, trade-secret, or NDA-protected data into AI applications.
9+Evidence (en, b947a55eb873): Teachers in the teaching setting and students in examinations and written work ... are subject to the labelling obligation when using AI-supported tools and are responsible for ensuring compliance with the legal regulations.
10+ai_tool_treatment: TU Graz states that Academic AI is available to all TU Graz employees and is intended to provide a secure AI environment respecting data protection and information security.
11+Evidence (en, 49b60c9fea14): The Academic AI is available to all TU Graz employees. The goal of this initiative is to create a secure environment for using AI while respecting data protection and information security.

Sejarah keluaran

0 public release diffs

Perubahan tuntutan

5 rekod Tuntut

ai_tool_treatment

TU Graz states that Academic AI is available to all TU Graz employees and is intended to provide a secure AI environment respecting data protection and information security.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan90%Bukti2Bahasaen

research

TU Graz's researcher guide explicitly encourages researchers to integrate AI into research processes while applying the AI-TU rule: analyse data, interpret results critically, truth-check results, and use results responsibly.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%Bukti2Bahasaen

privacy

TU Graz guidance requires transparent labelling of AI-supported tool use where applicable and cautions against entering personal, confidential, trade-secret, or NDA-protected data into AI applications.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan93%Bukti3Bahasaen

academic_integrity

TU Graz treats AI tools in examinations as unauthorized aids unless they are explicitly permitted, and the public teaching page says unpermitted AI use in assessment can make an examination attempt invalid due to cheating.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan95%Bukti2Bahasaen

teaching

TU Graz says teaching staff decide whether and which AI-supported tools may be used in each course or thesis, with only spell-checking, translation, and stylistic-grammatical improvement generally permitted for students absent broader authorization.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%Bukti2Bahasaen

Snapshot sumber

4 source attributions