Policy presence
University of Leicester has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Leicester, United Kingdom
University of Leicester has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
University of Leicester has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Leicester has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Leicester has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
University of Leicester has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
University of Leicester has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Leicester has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
University of Leicester has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
University of Leicester
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot_for_m365","rawToolName":"Microsoft 365 Copilot","description":"Leicester has announced a Microsoft collaboration to give all students and staff full Microsoft 365 Copilot access from September 2026.","howToObtain":"The official announcement schedules full access from September 2026; it does not state a current access process.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"not_mentioned","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}
Evidence originale
Evidence 1The University of Leicester has collaborated with Microsoft to provide full access to Microsoft 365 Copilot for all students and staff from September 2026.
Affichage localise only
The University of Leicester has collaborated with Microsoft to provide full access to Microsoft 365 Copilot for all students and staff from September 2026.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: university_level_ai_learning_teaching_assessment_framework
Evidence originale
Evidence 11.3 This policy provides a university-level framework, for staff and students for how and where it is appropriate to utilise AI for learning, teaching and assessment activities.
Privacy
Normalized value: no_personal_data_without_explicit_consent
Evidence originale
Evidence 17.2 Staff and students must not use Generative AI for any purpose that would result in personal data being collected, stored, accessed, and shared without the explicit consent of the people whose data is being processed.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: red_amber_green_assessment_categories
Evidence originale
Evidence 19.4 The University has identified three broad categories of assessment for the purposes of determining whether students may use Generative AI in the process of completing the assessment. Students will be informed which assessments fall into which categories.
Teaching
Normalized value: ai_marking_feedback_requires_staff_review_if_approved
Evidence originale
Evidence 19.20 Where a school wishes to request that the marking for an assessment could be supported by AI, this will be reviewed and subject to approval by the University. In all cases, any Generative AI supported marking must be subject to review and validation by members of academic staff.
Teaching
Normalized value: student_training_ai_in_academic_integrity
Evidence originale
Evidence 18.4 Training for students on the appropriate use of Generative AI should be included within the standard Academic Integrity training delivered to students.
0 machine or needs-review claim
3 source attribution
le.ac.uk
le.ac.uk
le.ac.uk