Bath, United Kingdom

University of Bath

Name: University of Bath AI Policy Tracker record
Creator: University AI Policy Tracker
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

ClassementQS World University Rankings 2026: =132Updated19 juil. 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Affirmations révisées

10 reviewed claims

Valeur normalisée: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"University of Bath supported generative-AI tool.","howToObtain":"Sign in to Copilot with a Bath email address.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"not_specified"}

Vérifié pour la dernière fois: 16 juil. 2026
Dernière modification: 16 juil. 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1

University of Bath Library states that the University's supported tool is Copilot and instructs users to log in using their Bath email address because this safeguards user data.
Source: AI and Plagiarism | University of Bath Library

Affichage localisé only

University of Bath Library states that the University's supported tool is Copilot and instructs users to log in using their Bath email address because this safeguards user data.

Langue de la source: English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané: e117576a…
Récupéré: 16 juil. 2026

Valeur normalisée: Assessment declaration bars presenting generative AI content as own work

Vérifié pour la dernière fois: 14 mai 2026
Dernière modification: 14 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1

By submitting your assessment, you confirm that: ... You have not presented content created by generative AI tools (such as Large Language Models like ChatGPT) as though it were your own work.
Source: Academic Integrity Statement

Langue de la source: English (en-GB)
Empreinte de l’instantané: c13a07d4…
Récupéré: 14 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve: Assessment submission declaration, item 7

Valeur normalisée: ABC assessment categories: A not permitted, B optional assistive use, C integral use

Vérifié pour la dernière fois: 14 mai 2026
Dernière modification: 14 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1

Type A | Use of GenAI is not permitted. Type B | Use of GenAI is optional as an assistive tool for specific defined processes. Type C | Use of GenAI is integral to the assessment.
Source: GenAI A, B, C Assessment Categorisations Guidance and Template Text - Learning and Teaching Hub

Langue de la source: English (en-GB)
Empreinte de l’instantané: daff0714…
Récupéré: 14 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve: Category guidance table

Valeur normalisée: Two-lane assessment model from 2026/27: closed no GenAI, open optional or necessary GenAI engagement

Vérifié pour la dernière fois: 14 mai 2026
Dernière modification: 14 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1

From 2026/27 onwards, we will move to a simpler, principles-based 'Two-Lane' approach... The two lanes are: (1) 'closed', where GenAI must not be used; (2) and 'open', where engagement with GenAI is either necessary or optional
Source: The Two-Lane Approach to GenAI Assessment Categorisation - Learning and Teaching Hub

Langue de la source: English (en-GB)
Empreinte de l’instantané: 3289c37c…
Récupéré: 14 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve: Evolving our approach / The Two-Lane Approach sections

Valeur normalisée: Confidential or commercially sensitive data should never be shared with AI

Vérifié pour la dernière fois: 14 mai 2026
Dernière modification: 14 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1

Please note: if you are privy to any confidential or commercially sensitive data this should never be shared with AI.
Source: Staff Guidance on the Ethical and Legal use of GenAI - Learning and Teaching Hub

Langue de la source: English (en-GB)
Empreinte de l’instantané: e106b329…
Récupéré: 14 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve: Data protection and copyright laws

Valeur normalisée: Copilot preferred for student data because university-login access does not collect chat logs/data or train wider model

Vérifié pour la dernière fois: 14 mai 2026
Dernière modification: 14 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1

Microsoft Copilot, when accessed through your university login, does not collect chat logs or data or train the wider model. We therefore advise using this tool in preference to any other when handling student data.
Source: Staff Guidance on the Ethical and Legal use of GenAI - Learning and Teaching Hub

Langue de la source: English (en-GB)
Empreinte de l’instantané: e106b329…
Récupéré: 14 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve: FAQ: Is there a particular AI tool that it would be better to use than another?

Valeur normalisée: AY25/26 transition: keep ABC labelling and add AI-use statement to B and C coursework briefs

Vérifié pour la dernière fois: 14 mai 2026
Dernière modification: 14 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1

Practical notes for course teams (AY25/26 transition) - Keep ABC labelling in handbooks while designing to the lanes. Ensure a short AI-use statement requirement is added to coursework briefs (B & C).
Source: The Two-Lane Approach to GenAI Assessment Categorisation - Learning and Teaching Hub

Langue de la source: English (en-GB)
Empreinte de l’instantané: 3289c37c…
Récupéré: 14 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve: Practical notes for course teams (AY25/26 transition)

Valeur normalisée: Summative grading/feedback judgment should remain with academic staff even if GenAI edits or augments feedback

Vérifié pour la dernière fois: 14 mai 2026
Dernière modification: 14 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1

There may be a role for GenAI in editing or augmenting feedback, but both the initial and final judgment of grade and feedback should rest with academic staff when handling summative work
Source: Staff Guidance on the Ethical and Legal use of GenAI - Learning and Teaching Hub

Langue de la source: English (en-GB)
Empreinte de l’instantané: e106b329…
Récupéré: 14 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve: FAQ: Can I use GenAI tools to assist in grading or giving feedback on student work?

Valeur normalisée: Open lane GenAI misuse not misconduct itself but can contribute to plagiarism, fabrication, collusion

Vérifié pour la dernière fois: 14 mai 2026
Dernière modification: 14 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1

Misusing GenAI is not classified as misconduct in itself, but we recognise that it can contribute to the offences of plagiarism, fabrication and collusion
Source: The Two-Lane Approach to Generative AI and Assessment: Frequently Asked Questions - Learning and Teaching Hub

Langue de la source: English (en-GB)
Empreinte de l’instantané: 0826bfa1…
Récupéré: 14 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve: FAQ item 9

Valeur normalisée: Microsoft Copilot is the only GenAI tool available to all University staff with Bath login

Vérifié pour la dernière fois: 14 mai 2026
Dernière modification: 14 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1

As at the "last updated" date shown at the top of this article, Copilot is the only Generative AI tool available to all University staff when logged into a device with a Bath login.
Source: Introduction to Microsoft Copilot - Learning and Teaching Hub

Langue de la source: English (en-GB)
Empreinte de l’instantané: c260d5d6…
Récupéré: 14 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve: What is Copilot?

Source record

Sources officielles

7 sources

Academic Integrity Statement

bath.ac.uk

URL de la source: https://www.bath.ac.uk/legal-information/academic-integrity-statement/
Hash de l'instantané: c13a07d4…

AI and Plagiarism | University of Bath Library

library.bath.ac.uk

URL de la source: https://library.bath.ac.uk/referencing/plagiarism
Hash de l'instantané: e117576a…

GenAI A, B, C Assessment Categorisations Guidance and Template Text - Learning and Teaching Hub

teachinghub.bath.ac.uk

URL de la source: https://teachinghub.bath.ac.uk/guide/generative-ai-abc-assessment-categorisations/
Hash de l'instantané: daff0714…

Introduction to Microsoft Copilot - Learning and Teaching Hub

teachinghub.bath.ac.uk

URL de la source: https://teachinghub.bath.ac.uk/guide/introduction-to-microsoft-copilot/
Hash de l'instantané: c260d5d6…

Staff Guidance on the Ethical and Legal use of GenAI - Learning and Teaching Hub

teachinghub.bath.ac.uk

URL de la source: https://teachinghub.bath.ac.uk/guide/staff-guidance-on-the-ethical-and-legal-use-of-genai/
Hash de l'instantané: e106b329…

The Two-Lane Approach to GenAI Assessment Categorisation - Learning and Teaching Hub

teachinghub.bath.ac.uk

URL de la source: https://teachinghub.bath.ac.uk/guide/genai-and-assessment/
Hash de l'instantané: 3289c37c…

The Two-Lane Approach to Generative AI and Assessment: Frequently Asked Questions - Learning and Teaching Hub

teachinghub.bath.ac.uk

URL de la source: https://teachinghub.bath.ac.uk/guide/the-two-lane-approach-frequently-asked-questions/
Hash de l'instantané: 0826bfa1…

Record information, JSON & citation

Révisionagent reviewedConfiance97%Snapshot statusNon publiéJSONJSON public

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Bath AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-bath

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Journal des modifications ouvert

University of Bath

No reviewed summary yet

Affirmations révisées

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Bath in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

The University of Bath Academic Integrity Statement requires students submitting assessment to confirm they have not presented content created by generative AI tools as though it were their own work.