University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Langue
ENZHFRPL

Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Effat University

ClassementQS World University Rankings 2026: 851-900Updated21 mai 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Affirmations révisées

5 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

Effat University's library AI guide says using generative-AI text without proper citation is considered plagiarism according to Effat University, while policies for using and crediting AI tools may vary by class.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance88%

Valeur normalisée: uncited_generative_ai_text_considered_plagiarism_class_policies_vary

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
21 mai 2026
Dernière modification
21 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Although a generative AI tool may not be classified as a "person," using text generated by such a tool without proper citation is still considered plagiarism, according to Effat University, because the work is not the researcher's original creation.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
a51a8c72…
Récupéré
21 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Artificial Intelligence and Academic Integrity, Plagiarism

Academic Integrity

Effat University's library AI guide warns that generative-AI tools can produce inaccurate or false citations and advises users to verify citations for accuracy and credit the underlying source rather than the AI tool when citing sourced information.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance86%

Valeur normalisée: verify_generative_ai_citations_credit_underlying_source

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
21 mai 2026
Dernière modification
21 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Tools like ChatGPT, which use Generative AI, have produced inaccurate citations. Even if the citations refer to actual papers, the content derived from them in ChatGPT may still be incorrect. It is always essential to verify citations for accuracy.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
a51a8c72…
Récupéré
21 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Artificial Intelligence and Academic Integrity, False Citations and Related Recommendations

Academic Integrity

Effat University's library AI guide advises users who decide to use ChatGPT or other AI technology for writing to be transparent with teachers and publishers and comply with applicable policies.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance84%

Valeur normalisée: transparent_ai_writing_use_comply_with_policies

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
21 mai 2026
Dernière modification
21 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Suppose you decide to use ChatGPT or any other AI technology for writing. In that case, being transparent with your teachers and publishers and ensuring you comply with their policies is essential.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
224cba9d…
Récupéré
21 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Citing Information Generated by ChatGPT/AI

Autre

Effat University Library provides a generative-AI resources guide that introduces AI concepts, impacts, approaches, and examples such as ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance82%

Valeur normalisée: library_generative_ai_resources_guide

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
21 mai 2026
Dernière modification
21 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Welcome to this library guide on artificial intelligence/AI. The guide is a valuable resource that will allow you to get more familiar with AI, including some key concepts, impacts, and approaches.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
75c9119a…
Récupéré
21 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Welcome section

Recherche

Effat University's library AI guide provides research-support guidance on prompt design, stating that well-structured prompts can help AI tools produce more accurate, meaningful, and relevant results.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance80%

Valeur normalisée: research_prompt_design_guidance

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
21 mai 2026
Dernière modification
21 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Good prompts enhance AI performance: A well-structured prompt enables the AI to deliver accurate, meaningful, and relevant results. On the other hand, poorly written prompts can lead to irrelevant or unhelpful outputs, hindering your research process.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
60001a68…
Récupéré
21 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Description

Source record

Sources officielles

4 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Révisionagent reviewedConfiance88%Snapshot statusNon publiéJSONJSON public

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Effat University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 21, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/effat-university

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Journal des modifications ouvert