University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Effat University

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: 851-900UpdatedMay 21, 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

5 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

Effat University's library AI guide says using generative-AI text without proper citation is considered plagiarism according to Effat University, while policies for using and crediting AI tools may vary by class.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: uncited_generative_ai_text_considered_plagiarism_class_policies_vary

Last checked
May 21, 2026
Last changed
May 21, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Although a generative AI tool may not be classified as a "person," using text generated by such a tool without proper citation is still considered plagiarism, according to Effat University, because the work is not the researcher's original creation.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
a51a8c72…
Retrieved
May 21, 2026
Evidence locator
Artificial Intelligence and Academic Integrity, Plagiarism

Academic Integrity

Effat University's library AI guide warns that generative-AI tools can produce inaccurate or false citations and advises users to verify citations for accuracy and credit the underlying source rather than the AI tool when citing sourced information.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: verify_generative_ai_citations_credit_underlying_source

Last checked
May 21, 2026
Last changed
May 21, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Tools like ChatGPT, which use Generative AI, have produced inaccurate citations. Even if the citations refer to actual papers, the content derived from them in ChatGPT may still be incorrect. It is always essential to verify citations for accuracy.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
a51a8c72…
Retrieved
May 21, 2026
Evidence locator
Artificial Intelligence and Academic Integrity, False Citations and Related Recommendations

Academic Integrity

Effat University's library AI guide advises users who decide to use ChatGPT or other AI technology for writing to be transparent with teachers and publishers and comply with applicable policies.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%

Normalized value: transparent_ai_writing_use_comply_with_policies

Last checked
May 21, 2026
Last changed
May 21, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Suppose you decide to use ChatGPT or any other AI technology for writing. In that case, being transparent with your teachers and publishers and ensuring you comply with their policies is essential.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
224cba9d…
Retrieved
May 21, 2026
Evidence locator
Citing Information Generated by ChatGPT/AI

Other

Effat University Library provides a generative-AI resources guide that introduces AI concepts, impacts, approaches, and examples such as ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: library_generative_ai_resources_guide

Last checked
May 21, 2026
Last changed
May 21, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Welcome to this library guide on artificial intelligence/AI. The guide is a valuable resource that will allow you to get more familiar with AI, including some key concepts, impacts, and approaches.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
75c9119a…
Retrieved
May 21, 2026
Evidence locator
Welcome section

Research

Effat University's library AI guide provides research-support guidance on prompt design, stating that well-structured prompts can help AI tools produce more accurate, meaningful, and relevant results.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence80%

Normalized value: research_prompt_design_guidance

Last checked
May 21, 2026
Last changed
May 21, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Good prompts enhance AI performance: A well-structured prompt enables the AI to deliver accurate, meaningful, and relevant results. On the other hand, poorly written prompts can lead to irrelevant or unhelpful outputs, hindering your research process.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
60001a68…
Retrieved
May 21, 2026
Evidence locator
Description

Source record

Official sources

4 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence88%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Effat University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 21, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/effat-university

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log