University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Langue
ENZHFRPL

Ithaca, United States

Cornell University

ClassementQS World University Rankings 2026: 16Updated18 juil. 2026

Reviewed policy snapshot

Cornell's public guidance leaves AI-use decisions to course or faculty policy and pairs conditional use with attribution and privacy limits.

Do

  • Read the syllabus and assignment policy for the specific course.
  • Document and attribute permitted AI use as your course instructions require.
  • Keep confidential and restricted Cornell information out of public AI tools.

Don't

  • Do not assume a general university-wide permission to use AI.
  • Do not omit attribution when AI-generated text is quoted directly.
  • Do not upload sensitive or regulated Cornell information to a public AI vendor.

Audience

For students · Coursework, exams, and disclosure

Reviewed material is available for this audience.

Coursework & assignments

Conditional

Cornell describes course-level choices that may prohibit, allow with attribution, or encourage generative AI.

Scope: Mixed scopeAssignment
Reviewed evidence & official sources

Reviewed evidence

Cornell's committee report recommends that the Code of Academic Integrity be updated with clear and explicit language on the use of generative AI, indicating that individual faculty have authority to determine when AI use is prohibited, attributed, or encouraged.
Révisé par un agent
The Code of Academic Integrity should be updated with clear and explicit language on the use of GAI, specifically indicating that individual faculty have authority to determine when its use is prohibited, attributed, or encouraged, and that use of GAI on assignments by students is only allowed when expressly permitted by the faculty member.
Cornell's IT guidelines endorse a flexible framework in which faculty and instructors can choose to prohibit, allow with attribution, or encourage generative AI use in education.
Révisé par un agent
Cornell encourages a flexible framework in which faculty and instructors can choose to prohibit, to allow with attribution, or to encourage generative AI use.

Exams & assessment

Not mentioned in reviewed sources

No exam-specific student rule is included in this snapshot.

Scope: Mixed scope
Reviewed evidence & official sources

No reviewed evidence is included in this dimension.

Disclosure & citation

Required

When GenAI is permitted, Cornell advises documentation and attribution, including citing the tool creator for direct quotations.

Scope: Mixed scopeAssignmentResearch
Reviewed evidence & official sources

Reviewed evidence

When generative AI use is permitted in a course, Cornell advises instructors to clarify expectations for documentation and attribution, including citing the AI tool creator (e.g., OpenAI for ChatGPT) when directly quoting AI-generated text in both in-text citations and reference lists.
Révisé par un agent
When generative AI is permitted, clarify expectations for documentation and attribution, as well as what aspects of the work should be produced by the students themselves. ... students should attribute directly quoted text to the creator of the generative AI tool used (e.g., cite OpenAI when directly quoting ChatGPT). This attribution should be used for both in-text citations and your reference list.

Privacy & sensitive data

Restricted

Cornell's IT guidance prohibits entering confidential, proprietary, regulated, sensitive, or restricted Cornell information into public AI tools.

Scope: Mixed scopeAssignmentResearch
Reviewed evidence & official sources

Reviewed evidence

Cornell's IT guidelines prohibit entering any confidential, proprietary, federally or state regulated, or otherwise sensitive or restricted Cornell information into public generative AI tools, as such information becomes public and may be stored and used by anyone.
Révisé par un agent
If you are using public generative AI tools, you cannot enter any Cornell information, or another person's information, that is confidential, proprietary, subject to federal or state regulations, or otherwise considered sensitive or restricted. Any information you provide to public generative AI tools is considered public and may be stored and used by anyone else.

University-provided AI tools

Conditional

Cornell lists Microsoft Copilot Basic in an official tool source, but the listing is not assessment permission.

Scope: Mixed scopeProvision ≠ coursework permission
Reviewed evidence & official sources

Reviewed evidence

Microsoft Copilot Basic is listed for Cornell University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Révisé par un agent
The generative AI tools listed below are currently available, or under consideration, at Cornell. Microsoft Copilot Basic is listed as General purpose for faculty, staff, and students. To request access to these services, contact us and we will help get you set up.

Research & publication

Unclear

Cornell says academic research use is governed by a separate task-force report, which this snapshot does not summarize.

Scope: Mixed scopeResearch
Reviewed evidence & official sources

Reviewed evidence

Cornell's IT guidelines state that use of generative AI in academic research is governed by the Cornell University Task Force Report 'Generative AI in Academic Research: Perspectives and Cultural Norms' (December 2023).
Révisé par un agent
The Cornell University Task Force Report, Generative AI in Academic Research: Perspectives and Cultural Norms (December 2023), offers perspectives and practical guidelines to the Cornell community on the use of generative AI in the practice and dissemination of academic research.

Reviewed record

Affirmations révisées

29 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Adobe Firefly is listed for Cornell University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance97%

Valeur normalisée: {"tool":"adobe_firefly","rawToolName":"Adobe Firefly","description":"Adobe Firefly image-generation service available with an Adobe license.","howToObtain":"Use an Adobe license; request help through the Cornell AI Innovation Hub.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
15 juil. 2026
Dernière modification
15 juil. 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
The Cornell AI Innovation Hub lists Adobe Firefly as a General purpose tool. Adobe Firefly is available with an Adobe license. To request access to these services, contact us and we will help get you set up.

Affichage localisé only

The Cornell AI Innovation Hub lists Adobe Firefly as a General purpose tool. Adobe Firefly is available with an Adobe license. To request access to these services, contact us and we will help get you set up.

Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
f5c1bec4…
Récupéré
15 juil. 2026

Ai Tool Treatment

Cornell AI Platform is listed for Cornell University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance97%

Valeur normalisée: {"tool":"institutional_ai_service","rawToolName":"Cornell AI Platform","description":"Cornell AI Innovation Hub pilot platform.","howToObtain":"Request access through the Cornell AI Innovation Hub.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
15 juil. 2026
Dernière modification
15 juil. 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
At Cornell, the AI Innovation Hub has been developing and maintaining an innovative, scalable, and secure platform of cutting-edge tools and resources available to virtually all groups on campus. Cornell AI Platform is listed as a Pilot for faculty, staff, and students. To request access, contact us and we will help get you set up.

Affichage localisé only

At Cornell, the AI Innovation Hub has been developing and maintaining an innovative, scalable, and secure platform of cutting-edge tools and resources available to virtually all groups on campus. Cornell AI Platform is listed as a Pilot for faculty, staff, and students. To request access, contact us and we will help get you set up.

Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
f5c1bec4…
Récupéré
15 juil. 2026

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot Basic is listed for Cornell University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance97%

Valeur normalisée: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot Basic","description":"Cornell-listed general-purpose Microsoft Copilot service.","howToObtain":"Request access through the Cornell AI Innovation Hub.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
15 juil. 2026
Dernière modification
15 juil. 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
The generative AI tools listed below are currently available, or under consideration, at Cornell. Microsoft Copilot Basic is listed as General purpose for faculty, staff, and students. To request access to these services, contact us and we will help get you set up.

Affichage localisé only

The generative AI tools listed below are currently available, or under consideration, at Cornell. Microsoft Copilot Basic is listed as General purpose for faculty, staff, and students. To request access to these services, contact us and we will help get you set up.

Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
f5c1bec4…
Récupéré
15 juil. 2026

Autre

Cornell's committee report states that any information educators are obligated to keep private under FERPA or HIPAA should not be shared with generative AI tools or uploaded to third-party AI vendors.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
GAI tools pose potential privacy risks because data that is shared may be used as training data by the third-party vendor providing the service. Therefore, any information that educators are obligated to keep private, for example, under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), should not be shared with such tools or uploaded to these third party vendors of GAI.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
deeacd6d…
Localisateur de preuve
Section 3.1.2: Attribution, authorship, access, and accountability in the use of GAI

Autre

Cornell's committee report states that original research or content owned by Cornell University, students, or employees should not be uploaded to AI tools, as it can become part of the AI tool's training data.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
GAI tools also have implications for intellectual property rights. Original research or content that is owned by Cornell University, our students, or employees should not be uploaded to these tools, since they can become part of the training data used by the GAI tools.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
deeacd6d…
Localisateur de preuve
Section 3.1.2: Attribution, authorship, access, and accountability in the use of GAI

Autre

Cornell's committee report does not recommend the use of generative AI for summative evaluation or grading of student work, stating that evaluation and grading is among the most important tasks entrusted to faculty.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
While GAI may have selective utility in assisting in providing feedback for low-stakes formative assessment (for example in practice problems), we currently do NOT recommend it be used in summative evaluation of student work. Evaluation and grading of students is among the most important tasks entrusted to faculty, and the integrity of the grading process is reliant on the primary role of the faculty member.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
deeacd6d…
Localisateur de preuve
Section 3.3: Use of GAI by instructors for course content creation

Autre

Cornell's committee report recommends three policy approaches for generative AI use: prohibit GAI where it interferes with foundational learning, allow with attribution where it supports higher-level thinking, and encourage use where it enables exploration and creative thinking.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
We recommend instructors consider three kinds of policies either for individual assignments or generally in their courses. To prohibit the use of GAI where it interferes with the student developing foundational understanding, skills, and knowledge needed for future courses and careers. To allow with attribution where GAI could be a useful resource, but the instructor needs to be aware of its use by the student and the student must learn to take responsibility for accuracy and correct attribution of GAI-generated content. To encourage and actively integrate GAI into the learning process where students can leverage GAI to focus on higher-level learning objectives, explore creative ideas, or...
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
deeacd6d…
Localisateur de preuve
Executive summary, Recommendations subsection

Autre

Cornell's committee report discourages the use of automatic detection algorithms for academic integrity violations using generative AI, stating they cannot decisively provide evidence and could lead to unfairly identifying violations, including bias against non-native speakers.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
We currently discourage the use of automatic detection algorithms for academic integrity violations using GAI, given their unreliability and current inability to provide definitive evidence of violations.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
deeacd6d…
Localisateur de preuve
Section 4: Recommendations for faculty and administration (faculty recommendations)

Autre

Cornell's IT guidelines state that users are accountable for their work regardless of the tools used to produce it, and when using generative AI tools must always verify information for errors and biases and exercise caution to avoid copyright infringement.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
You are accountable for your work, regardless of the tools you use to produce it. When using generative AI tools, always verify the information for errors and biases and exercise caution to avoid copyright infringement.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
b1a7c670…
Localisateur de preuve
Accountability section

Autre

Cornell's IT guidelines prohibit entering any confidential, proprietary, federally or state regulated, or otherwise sensitive or restricted Cornell information into public generative AI tools, as such information becomes public and may be stored and used by anyone.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
If you are using public generative AI tools, you cannot enter any Cornell information, or another person's information, that is confidential, proprietary, subject to federal or state regulations, or otherwise considered sensitive or restricted. Any information you provide to public generative AI tools is considered public and may be stored and used by anyone else.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
b1a7c670…
Localisateur de preuve
Confidentiality and Privacy section

Autre

Cornell has established seven core principles for generative AI in education: integrity of the faculty-student relation, commitment to experimentation and evidence, centrality of faculty judgment, responsiveness to student needs, recognition of both AI goods and harms, respect for institutional and disciplinary heterogeneity, and renewal of Cornell's core mission and values.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Cornell's response to generative AI in teaching and learning is built around seven core principles. We invite instructors to consider these principles as they make decisions and talk with their students and colleagues about generative AI and learning: The integrity of the faculty-student relation. A commitment to experimentation, evidence and learning from experience. The centrality of faculty judgment and expertise in the classroom. Responsiveness to real student needs and uses. Recognition of both AI 'goods' and 'harms'. Respect for institutional and disciplinary heterogeneity. The extension and renewal of Cornell's core mission and values.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
9e356eb6…
Localisateur de preuve
Cornell's Core Principles for Generative AI in Education section

Autre

Cornell recommends that faculty clearly communicate their generative AI policies in their syllabus, in assignment instructions, and verbally in class to support student learning and reduce academic integrity violations.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
To best support student learning and reduce violations of academic integrity, be sure to clearly communicate your policies regarding the use of generative AI in your syllabus, in assignment instructions, and verbally in class.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
dc5bf374…
Localisateur de preuve
Opening paragraph of AI & Academic Integrity page

Autre

Cornell does not recommend using automatic AI detection algorithms for academic integrity violations, citing their unreliability and inability to provide definitive evidence, and the risk of wrongly accusing students.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
We currently do not recommend using current automatic detection algorithms for academic integrity violations using generative AI, given their unreliability and current inability to provide definitive evidence of violations.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
dc5bf374…
Localisateur de preuve
Detecting AI-Generated Content section

Autre

Cornell's committee report recommends that the Code of Academic Integrity be updated with clear and explicit language on the use of generative AI, indicating that individual faculty have authority to determine when AI use is prohibited, attributed, or encouraged.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance93%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
The Code of Academic Integrity should be updated with clear and explicit language on the use of GAI, specifically indicating that individual faculty have authority to determine when its use is prohibited, attributed, or encouraged, and that use of GAI on assignments by students is only allowed when expressly permitted by the faculty member.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
deeacd6d…
Localisateur de preuve
Section 4: Recommendations for faculty and administration (administration recommendations)

Autre

Cornell's IT guidelines endorse a flexible framework in which faculty and instructors can choose to prohibit, allow with attribution, or encourage generative AI use in education.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance93%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Cornell encourages a flexible framework in which faculty and instructors can choose to prohibit, to allow with attribution, or to encourage generative AI use.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
b1a7c670…
Localisateur de preuve
Use for Education and Pedagogy section

Autre

Cornell established the GenAI Education Working Group in spring 2024 with all-college representation including faculty, staff, and students, as the central body for developing new ideas, policies, and practices around generative AI in the classroom.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance93%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Established in spring 2024 with all-college representation including faculty, staff and students, the Cornell GenAI Education Working Group, a part of the university-wide AI Advisory Council, is the central place in which new ideas, policies and practices around GenAI in the classroom are being worked out at Cornell.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
67ef8f74…
Localisateur de preuve
Main content section, second paragraph

Autre

Cornell developed seven standardized AI course policy icons (ANY-AI, AT, UA, PP, AS, ER, AI-FREE) to help instructors clearly communicate AI use expectations in syllabi and assignments, which can be combined for nuanced policies.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance93%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
These icons have been developed to help you clearly and consistently communicate your expectations. They can be used on the syllabus to convey an overall course approach. They can also be used for individual assignments, allowing you to distinguish different policies for different assignments with different learning goals. Icons can be combined to more fully reflect your course policy.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
04f6b71e…
Localisateur de preuve
Opening paragraph of AI Course Policy Icons page

Autre

When generative AI use is permitted in a course, Cornell advises instructors to clarify expectations for documentation and attribution, including citing the AI tool creator (e.g., OpenAI for ChatGPT) when directly quoting AI-generated text in both in-text citations and reference lists.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance93%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
When generative AI is permitted, clarify expectations for documentation and attribution, as well as what aspects of the work should be produced by the students themselves. ... students should attribute directly quoted text to the creator of the generative AI tool used (e.g., cite OpenAI when directly quoting ChatGPT). This attribution should be used for both in-text citations and your reference list.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
dc5bf374…
Localisateur de preuve
Opening guidance paragraph and AS-UA sample policy language section

Autre

Cornell's Center for Teaching Innovation recommends that faculty discuss course policies and expectations around the use of generative AI tools with their students and clearly communicate when and in what ways use of such tools is permitted or not.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance92%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
We recommend discussing course policies and expectations around their use, and clearly communicating with your students when and in what ways use of generative AI tools are permitted – or not.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
9e356eb6…
Localisateur de preuve
Responding to Generative AI in Classes section, recommendation paragraph

Autre

Cornell developed a set of course policy icons through the GenAI Advisory Council to help instructors clearly and consistently communicate AI use expectations to students in syllabi and assignment instructions.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance92%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
A set of course policy icons has been developed by the GenAI Advisory Council to help Cornell instructors communicate with students about appropriate AI use for different courses and assignments. They are downloadable and can be incorporated into your syllabus or assignment instructions, to help provide clear guidance to students about course expectations.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
dc5bf374…
Localisateur de preuve
Opening section, after introductory paragraph

Autre

Cornell holds students responsible for verifying the accuracy of AI-generated output and references when AI use is allowed for an assignment.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance92%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Discuss with students how generative AI output can be incorrect or problematic and that they are responsible for verifying the output and references if AI use is allowed for an assignment.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
dc5bf374…
Localisateur de preuve
Opening paragraph of AI & Academic Integrity page

Autre

Cornell describes measures faculty may use to evaluate potential AI-related academic integrity concerns, including requiring students to verify citations and references, requesting verification of references or methods, and informing students that they should expect to verbally explain submitted work.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance90%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Require that students verify the accuracy of all citations and references they include in their work. Request that students provide verification of references or methods, with a student's response determining whether a formal academic integrity notification is warranted. ... Inform and remind students that they should expect to verbally explain the work they submitted.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
dc5bf374…
Localisateur de preuve
Prevention > Set Clear Expectations in the Syllabus section

Autre

Cornell's IT guidelines state that use of generative AI in academic research is governed by the Cornell University Task Force Report 'Generative AI in Academic Research: Perspectives and Cultural Norms' (December 2023).

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance90%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
The Cornell University Task Force Report, Generative AI in Academic Research: Perspectives and Cultural Norms (December 2023), offers perspectives and practical guidelines to the Cornell community on the use of generative AI in the practice and dissemination of academic research.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
b1a7c670…
Localisateur de preuve
Use for Research section

Autre

Cornell's IT guidelines state that use of generative AI for administrative purposes must comply with the Cornell Generative AI in Administration Task Force Report (January 2024).

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance90%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
The use of generative AI for administration purposes must comply with the guidelines of the Cornell Generative AI in Administration Task Force Report (January 2024).
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
b1a7c670…
Localisateur de preuve
Use for Administration and Other Purposes section

Autre

Cornell's 'AI+AI' initiative aims to strengthen and update academic integrity procedures to better reflect the presence of generative AI, including better models for attributing student use of GenAI and development of evidentiary standards for adjudicating GenAI-related violations.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance90%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
'AI+AI': efforts to strengthen and update Cornell's academic integrity procedures to better reflect the presence of GenAI, including better models for attributing student use of GenAI in assignments or course settings; efforts to streamline, strengthen, and reform the university's academic integrity system; and the development of evidentiary standards and processes appropriate to the adjudication of GenAI-related violations of academic integrity.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
67ef8f74…
Localisateur de preuve
Key initiatives list, AI+AI bullet point

Autre

Cornell considers generative AI literacy essential for both students and faculty, defining it as the ability to understand, evaluate, and critically engage with generative AI technologies.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance90%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
The need for AI literacy is essential for students and faculty alike. We can think of ethical generative AI literacies as the ability to understand, evaluate, and critically engage with generative AI technologies.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
9e356eb6…
Localisateur de preuve
Generative AI Literacy section

Autre

Cornell provides sample syllabus language for an AI-FREE policy that prohibits all generative AI tools, including tools that help reorganize and edit written work, to ensure development of foundational concepts and skills.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance90%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
To ensure development and mastery of the foundational concepts and skills in this course, the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools is prohibited. This includes tools that help reorganize and edit your written work because the ability to self-assess, reflect on your writing process, and develop your own voice are essential in your growth as a writer.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
dc5bf374…
Localisateur de preuve
Example Course Policy Language - Prohibiting Generative AI Use (AI-FREE) section

Autre

Cornell provides sample syllabus language for an AS-UA policy where AI use is generally discouraged but permitted for select assignments with proper attribution, requiring students to cite the AI tool creator.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance90%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Mastering the essential, foundational concepts of this course takes effort and practice. Accordingly, the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools is generally discouraged in this course, but will be permitted for select assignments. ... If used in any capacity for an assignment, generative AI requires proper attribution for any and all generated work.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
dc5bf374…
Localisateur de preuve
Example Course Policy Language - Permitting Generative AI Use with Attribution (AS-UA) section

Autre

Cornell's AI course policy icons include a 'PP' (Privacy Protecting) icon indicating that generative AI use is permitted but no copyrighted or proprietary class materials should be uploaded unless otherwise specified.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance88%
Dernière modification
6 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
PP (Privacy Protecting—No Proprietary Materials): GenAI use permitted, but no uploading of copyrighted or proprietary class materials unless otherwise specified.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
04f6b71e…
Localisateur de preuve
AI Course Policy table, PP row

Source record

Sources officielles

7 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Révisionagent reviewedConfiance97%Snapshot statusstrongHash de l'instantané4fc37d09…JSONJSON public

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Cornell University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 18, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/cornell-university

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Journal des modifications ouvert