University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Langue
ENZHFRPL

Gwangju, South Korea

Chonnam National University

ClassementQS World University Rankings 2026: 901-950Updated21 mai 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Affirmations révisées

4 reviewed claims

Enseignement

Chonnam's generative-AI writing assignment guideline tells instructors to state in the syllabus whether generative AI is allowed and, when allowed, to explain scope, misconduct criteria, the ethics pledge, and checklist use.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance92%

Valeur normalisée: Instructors should disclose AI allowance and policy in syllabus; if AI is allowed, explain scope and misconduct criteria.

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
21 mai 2026
Dernière modification
21 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
글쓰기 과제 수행 시 생성형 AI 허용 여부를 <수업계획서(syllabus)>에 명시하고, 학습자에게 명확히 안내하여 주십시오. 생성형 AI의 활용을 허용하는 경우, 활용 가능 범위와 부정행위 기준, 글쓰기 과제 윤리 준수 서약서 작성 및 체크리스트 활용법 등을 구체적으로 설명하여 주십시오.

Affichage localisé only

For writing assignments, instructors are told to specify in the syllabus whether generative AI is allowed and clearly inform learners. If allowed, the guideline says to explain permitted scope, misconduct criteria, the ethics pledge, and checklist use.

Langue de la source
ko
Empreinte de l’instantané
4fdf26dd…
Récupéré
21 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
PDF section II.2

Academic Integrity

Chonnam's generative-AI writing assignment guideline identifies improper AI uses that can constitute misconduct, including submitting copied AI output without attribution, patchworking AI output without attribution, using AI to create or spread false information or experiences, infringing copyright or intellectual property, and using AI in a class where it is fully prohibited.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance91%

Valeur normalisée: Improper AI use examples: copied output without attribution, unattributed patchworking, false information/experience, copyright/IP infringement, use in fully prohibited classes.

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
21 mai 2026
Dernière modification
21 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
다음은 생성형 AI를 부적절하게 사용한 경우로, 부정행위에 해당합니다. ① 생성형 AI 산출물을 복사하여 과제에 그대로 붙인 채 출처를 표기하지 않는 행위 ② 생성형 AI 산출물의 출처를 표기하지 않은 채 짜깁기하는 행위 ③ 생성형 AI를 활용하여 거짓 정보, 거짓 경험을 작성하거나 유포하는 행위 ④ 생성형 AI를 활용하여 타인의 저작권, 지식재산권을 불법적으로 침해하는 행위 ⑤ 생성형 AI 사용이 전면 금지된 수업에서 생성형 AI를 사용한 행위

Affichage localisé only

The guideline lists improper uses that count as misconduct, including copying AI output into an assignment without attribution, patchworking AI output without attribution, creating or spreading false information or experiences with AI, infringing copyright or intellectual property, and using AI in a class where AI is fully prohibited.

Langue de la source
ko
Empreinte de l’instantané
4fdf26dd…
Récupéré
21 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
PDF section II.2

Ai Tool Treatment

Chonnam National University announced that it would provide eight generative AI services free of charge to all faculty, staff, and enrolled students.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance90%

Valeur normalisée: Free access announced for ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, Llama, Mistral, and Qwen for faculty/staff and students.

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
21 mai 2026
Dernière modification
21 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
14일 전남대에 따르면 대학은 글로컬대학30 핵심 전략에 따라 전 교직원과 재학생에게 생성형 AI 8종을 15일부터 무료 제공한다. 무료 개방·제공하는 생성형 AI 프로그램은 ▲ChatGPT ▲Gemini ▲Perplexity ▲Claude ▲Grok ▲Llama ▲Mistral ▲Qwen 등 총 8종이다.

Affichage localisé only

According to Chonnam, under its Glocal University 30 strategy it would provide eight generative AI services free from the 15th to all faculty/staff and enrolled students: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, Llama, Mistral, and Qwen.

Langue de la source
ko
Empreinte de l’instantané
eae30e58…
Récupéré
21 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Article body

Confidentialité

Chonnam's generative-AI writing assignment guideline cautions learners that information entered into generative AI may be stored on servers and used to improve performance, so they should be careful about security and information leakage.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance90%

Valeur normalisée: Learners should consider security and information leakage because generative-AI inputs may be stored and used for model/service improvement.

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
21 mai 2026
Dernière modification
21 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
생성형 AI를 활용한다면, 보안·정보 유출 등을 주의하십시오. 생성형 AI에 입력하는 정보는 서버에 저장되고 성능 개선을 위한 자료로 활용 가능하므로 주의하십시오.

Affichage localisé only

The guideline tells learners to be careful about security and information leakage when using generative AI, noting that information entered into generative AI may be stored on servers and used for performance improvement.

Langue de la source
ko
Empreinte de l’instantané
4fdf26dd…
Récupéré
21 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
PDF section III.7

Source record

Sources officielles

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Révisionagent reviewedConfiance92%Snapshot statusNon publiéJSONJSON public

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Chonnam National University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 21, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/chonnam-national-university

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Journal des modifications ouvert