Change log

University of East Anglia (UEA)

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Claims5Sources5Release records0

University page Public JSON Monthly report University index

University of East Anglia (UEA) currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for University of East Anglia (UEA). Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

11 # University of East Anglia (UEA) AI policy record
2+privacy: UEA's research and innovation policy says researchers are currently prohibited from entering personal, confidential, third-party, or UEA business-critical data into a generative AI tool without prior approval from information compliance and IT.
3+Evidence (en, a24bbea25a2e): The University currently prohibits researchers to input any Personal (including Special Category Data), Confidential, Third Party, or UEA Business Critical Data / information / material into a Generative AI tool, without prior approval from the Information Compliance Team and the relevant IT Team.
4+academic_integrity: UEA's plagiarism and collusion policy permits AI to help students understand material and expression, but says using AI to complete an assessment, or part of it, is plagiarism and may reach contract cheating.
5+Evidence (en, e50e4440e535): While you are permitted to use artificial intelligence software to help you understand material and how that can be expressed, you are not allowed to use that software to complete the assessment (or any part of it) for you. If you use artificial intelligence software to complete the work for you, that will be plagiarism.
6+teaching: UEA's teaching and learning policy does not prohibit generative AI use, and says each School of Study should meet at least annually to discuss generative AI's impact on assessment design and set School-level expectations.
7+Evidence (en, 9a5eee01a43c): The policy does not prohibit the use of Generative AI for teaching and learning but aims to add clarity around appropriate use. Each School of Study should meet at least once per academic year to discuss the impact of generative AI on assessment design and set School-level expectations.
8+research: UEA's research and innovation policy requires a self-assessment process when generative AI will be used, built, or developed in UEA research, subject to listed exceptions.
9+Evidence (en, a24bbea25a2e): The University requires the completion of a Self Assessment Form for research undertaken by UEA staff and students or involving UEA, where a Generative AI tool will be used, built or developed, noting the exceptions listed below.
10+academic_integrity: For Norwich Medical School written assessments, UEA's FOI appendix says generative AI is not permitted in writing submissions unless a module leader explicitly permits it, while early ideation and later grammar or clarity support are allowed.
11+Evidence (en, 617031925440): The use of generative artificial intelligence is not permitted in the writing of your submission, unless explicitly permitted by the module leader. This includes, but is not limited to, NOT using AI to generate or draft written content, rewrite or paraphrase existing material, summarise academic sources, or create citations or references.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

5 claim records

privacy

UEA's research and innovation policy says researchers are currently prohibited from entering personal, confidential, third-party, or UEA business-critical data into a generative AI tool without prior approval from information compliance and IT.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

UEA's plagiarism and collusion policy permits AI to help students understand material and expression, but says using AI to complete an assessment, or part of it, is plagiarism and may reach contract cheating.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

UEA's teaching and learning policy does not prohibit generative AI use, and says each School of Study should meet at least annually to discuss generative AI's impact on assessment design and set School-level expectations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

research

UEA's research and innovation policy requires a self-assessment process when generative AI will be used, built, or developed in UEA research, subject to listed exceptions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

For Norwich Medical School written assessments, UEA's FOI appendix says generative AI is not permitted in writing submissions unless a module leader explicitly permits it, while early ideation and later grammar or clarity support are allowed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen