变更日志

University of East Anglia (UEA)

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

审核: 智能体已审核最后检查时间2026年5月16日最后更改时间2026年5月16日声明5来源5版本记录0

大学页面公开 JSON 月度报告大学索引

University of East Anglia (UEA) currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月16日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 University of East Anglia (UEA)。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化，这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

政策文本0新提取的0证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源0已移除来源0

11 # University of East Anglia (UEA) AI policy record
2+privacy: UEA's research and innovation policy says researchers are currently prohibited from entering personal, confidential, third-party, or UEA business-critical data into a generative AI tool without prior approval from information compliance and IT.
3+Evidence (en, a24bbea25a2e): The University currently prohibits researchers to input any Personal (including Special Category Data), Confidential, Third Party, or UEA Business Critical Data / information / material into a Generative AI tool, without prior approval from the Information Compliance Team and the relevant IT Team.
4+academic_integrity: UEA's plagiarism and collusion policy permits AI to help students understand material and expression, but says using AI to complete an assessment, or part of it, is plagiarism and may reach contract cheating.
5+Evidence (en, e50e4440e535): While you are permitted to use artificial intelligence software to help you understand material and how that can be expressed, you are not allowed to use that software to complete the assessment (or any part of it) for you. If you use artificial intelligence software to complete the work for you, that will be plagiarism.
6+teaching: UEA's teaching and learning policy does not prohibit generative AI use, and says each School of Study should meet at least annually to discuss generative AI's impact on assessment design and set School-level expectations.
7+Evidence (en, 9a5eee01a43c): The policy does not prohibit the use of Generative AI for teaching and learning but aims to add clarity around appropriate use. Each School of Study should meet at least once per academic year to discuss the impact of generative AI on assessment design and set School-level expectations.
8+research: UEA's research and innovation policy requires a self-assessment process when generative AI will be used, built, or developed in UEA research, subject to listed exceptions.
9+Evidence (en, a24bbea25a2e): The University requires the completion of a Self Assessment Form for research undertaken by UEA staff and students or involving UEA, where a Generative AI tool will be used, built or developed, noting the exceptions listed below.
10+academic_integrity: For Norwich Medical School written assessments, UEA's FOI appendix says generative AI is not permitted in writing submissions unless a module leader explicitly permits it, while early ideation and later grammar or clarity support are allowed.
11+Evidence (en, 617031925440): The use of generative artificial intelligence is not permitted in the writing of your submission, unless explicitly permitted by the module leader. This includes, but is not limited to, NOT using AI to generate or draft written content, rewrite or paraphrase existing material, summarise academic sources, or create citations or references.

版本历史

0 public release diffs

声明变更

5 声明条记录

privacy

UEA's research and innovation policy says researchers are currently prohibited from entering personal, confidential, third-party, or UEA business-critical data into a generative AI tool without prior approval from information compliance and IT.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%证据1语言en

academic_integrity

UEA's plagiarism and collusion policy permits AI to help students understand material and expression, but says using AI to complete an assessment, or part of it, is plagiarism and may reach contract cheating.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度92%证据1语言en

teaching

UEA's teaching and learning policy does not prohibit generative AI use, and says each School of Study should meet at least annually to discuss generative AI's impact on assessment design and set School-level expectations.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%证据1语言en

research

UEA's research and innovation policy requires a self-assessment process when generative AI will be used, built, or developed in UEA research, subject to listed exceptions.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%证据1语言en

academic_integrity

For Norwich Medical School written assessments, UEA's FOI appendix says generative AI is not permitted in writing submissions unless a module leader explicitly permits it, while early ideation and later grammar or clarity support are allowed.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%证据1语言en