academic_integrity
DTU's exam-cheating rules state that use of AI such as ChatGPT or similar artificial intelligence, where the program writes or solves a task, is plagiarism if no source reference is made.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Technical University of Denmark
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Technical University of Denmark currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Technical University of Denmark. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Technical University of Denmark combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+16-0
11 # Technical University of Denmark AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: DTU's exam-cheating rules state that use of AI such as ChatGPT or similar artificial intelligence, where the program writes or solves a task, is plagiarism if no source reference is made.
3+Evidence (da, 8cc287bd22b0): Anvendelse af AI, som f.eks. ChatGPT og tilsvarende former for kunstig intelligens, hvor det ikke er én selv, men programmet/robotten, der skriver, løser en opgave mv., er også plagiat, hvis man ikke laver kildehenvisning.
4+ai_tool_treatment: DTU states that it permits generative AI in teaching and open-internet exams, while current exam use is limited to selected courses and exams.
5+Evidence (da, e000aed66167): DTU omfavner brugen af kunstig intelligens (generativ AI) og tillader derfor brugen af generativ AI i undervisning og til eksamen med åbent internet. ... På nuværende tidspunkt er AI tilladt til enkelte eksaminer.
6+academic_integrity: DTU tells students they may use AI in their studies if they clearly state when and how they use it and follow source-citation rules.
7+Evidence (da, e000aed66167): Ja selvfølgelig, så længe de studerende tydeligt anfører, når og hvordan de bruger AI. Se reglerne for kildeangivelser ved brug af generativ AI.
8+academic_integrity: DTU Library guidance says generative AI use in project reports and final project assignments must be distinctly declared, including how it was used.
9+Evidence (en, de1679c69cfb): DTU permits the use of generative AI but please be mindful of the following guidelines if you use generative AI in your project: Declare. You must distinctly declare that you have used AI in your report and how you have used it.
10+ai_tool_treatment: DTU states that it currently does not have rules specifying which AI tools are allowed or prohibited, and instead emphasizes common sense, the honour code, and clear source attribution.
11+Evidence (da, e000aed66167): Derfor har DTU på nuværende tidpunkt ikke regler for hvilke AI værktøjer der er tilladte eller ej – men opfordrer til sund fornuft, bevidsthed om DTU’s ærekodeks og tydelig kildeangivelse.
12+teaching: DTU states that teachers may use AI when preparing teaching materials.
13+Evidence (da, e000aed66167): Må undervisere bruge AI, når de tilrettelægger deres undervisningsmateriale? Ja selvfølgelig. AI er en mulighed for gentænke underviserrolle.
14+privacy: DTU says content subject to GDPR or otherwise critical for DTU or individuals should use Copilot for the web.
15+Evidence (da, e000aed66167): Hvis indholdet er underlagt GDPR eller på anden måde er kritisk for DTU’s virke eller for personer, bør du bruge Copilot for the web.
16+security_review: DTU's tool guidance says an AI tool should go through DTU's official channels before use when a responsible person would impose it on others at DTU.
17+Evidence (en, 6643e0cda490): If you are considering using the tool not for personal use, but for an activity at DTU where you have the overarching responsibility ... you should run the tool through DTU’s official channels before starting to use it.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
8 claim records
ai_tool_treatment
DTU states that it permits generative AI in teaching and open-internet exams, while current exam use is limited to selected courses and exams.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
DTU tells students they may use AI in their studies if they clearly state when and how they use it and follow source-citation rules.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
DTU Library guidance says generative AI use in project reports and final project assignments must be distinctly declared, including how it was used.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
DTU states that it currently does not have rules specifying which AI tools are allowed or prohibited, and instead emphasizes common sense, the honour code, and clear source attribution.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
DTU states that teachers may use AI when preparing teaching materials.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
DTU says content subject to GDPR or otherwise critical for DTU or individuals should use Copilot for the web.
Review: Agent reviewed
security_review
DTU's tool guidance says an AI tool should go through DTU's official channels before use when a responsible person would impose it on others at DTU.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
How to declare the use of Generative AI
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:02 AM
Rules and FAQ | DTU AI Info Hub
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:00 AM
Snyd ved eksamen og anden bedømmelse
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:03 AM
Tools | DTU AI Info Hub
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:01 AM