academic_integrity
DTU's exam-cheating rules state that use of AI such as ChatGPT or similar artificial intelligence, where the program writes or solves a task, is plagiarism if no source reference is made.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Technical University of Denmark
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Technical University of Denmark currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
8 claim records
ai_tool_treatment
DTU states that it permits generative AI in teaching and open-internet exams, while current exam use is limited to selected courses and exams.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
DTU tells students they may use AI in their studies if they clearly state when and how they use it and follow source-citation rules.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
DTU Library guidance says generative AI use in project reports and final project assignments must be distinctly declared, including how it was used.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
DTU states that it currently does not have rules specifying which AI tools are allowed or prohibited, and instead emphasizes common sense, the honour code, and clear source attribution.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
DTU states that teachers may use AI when preparing teaching materials.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
DTU says content subject to GDPR or otherwise critical for DTU or individuals should use Copilot for the web.
Review: Agent reviewed
security_review
DTU's tool guidance says an AI tool should go through DTU's official channels before use when a responsible person would impose it on others at DTU.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
How to declare the use of Generative AI
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:02 AM
Rules and FAQ | DTU AI Info Hub
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:00 AM
Snyd ved eksamen og anden bedømmelse
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:03 AM
Tools | DTU AI Info Hub
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:01 AM