academic_integrity
DTU's exam-cheating rules state that use of AI such as ChatGPT or similar artificial intelligence, where the program writes or solves a task, is plagiarism if no source reference is made.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Technical University of Denmark
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Technical University of Denmark currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Claim/evidence diff preview
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Technical University of Denmark current policy evidence
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
+16-0
11 # Technical University of Denmark AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: DTU's exam-cheating rules state that use of AI such as ChatGPT or similar artificial intelligence, where the program writes or solves a task, is plagiarism if no source reference is made.
3+Evidence (da, 8cc287bd22b0): Anvendelse af AI, som f.eks. ChatGPT og tilsvarende former for kunstig intelligens, hvor det ikke er én selv, men programmet/robotten, der skriver, løser en opgave mv., er også plagiat, hvis man ikke laver kildehenvisning.
4+ai_tool_treatment: DTU states that it permits generative AI in teaching and open-internet exams, while current exam use is limited to selected courses and exams.
5+Evidence (da, e000aed66167): DTU omfavner brugen af kunstig intelligens (generativ AI) og tillader derfor brugen af generativ AI i undervisning og til eksamen med åbent internet. ... På nuværende tidspunkt er AI tilladt til enkelte eksaminer.
6+academic_integrity: DTU tells students they may use AI in their studies if they clearly state when and how they use it and follow source-citation rules.
7+Evidence (da, e000aed66167): Ja selvfølgelig, så længe de studerende tydeligt anfører, når og hvordan de bruger AI. Se reglerne for kildeangivelser ved brug af generativ AI.
8+academic_integrity: DTU Library guidance says generative AI use in project reports and final project assignments must be distinctly declared, including how it was used.
9+Evidence (en, de1679c69cfb): DTU permits the use of generative AI but please be mindful of the following guidelines if you use generative AI in your project: Declare. You must distinctly declare that you have used AI in your report and how you have used it.
10+ai_tool_treatment: DTU states that it currently does not have rules specifying which AI tools are allowed or prohibited, and instead emphasizes common sense, the honour code, and clear source attribution.
11+Evidence (da, e000aed66167): Derfor har DTU på nuværende tidpunkt ikke regler for hvilke AI værktøjer der er tilladte eller ej – men opfordrer til sund fornuft, bevidsthed om DTU’s ærekodeks og tydelig kildeangivelse.
12+teaching: DTU states that teachers may use AI when preparing teaching materials.
13+Evidence (da, e000aed66167): Må undervisere bruge AI, når de tilrettelægger deres undervisningsmateriale? Ja selvfølgelig. AI er en mulighed for gentænke underviserrolle.
14+privacy: DTU says content subject to GDPR or otherwise critical for DTU or individuals should use Copilot for the web.
15+Evidence (da, e000aed66167): Hvis indholdet er underlagt GDPR eller på anden måde er kritisk for DTU’s virke eller for personer, bør du bruge Copilot for the web.
16+security_review: DTU's tool guidance says an AI tool should go through DTU's official channels before use when a responsible person would impose it on others at DTU.
17+Evidence (en, 6643e0cda490): If you are considering using the tool not for personal use, but for an activity at DTU where you have the overarching responsibility ... you should run the tool through DTU’s official channels before starting to use it.
Claim changes
8 claim records
ai_tool_treatment
DTU states that it permits generative AI in teaching and open-internet exams, while current exam use is limited to selected courses and exams.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
DTU tells students they may use AI in their studies if they clearly state when and how they use it and follow source-citation rules.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
DTU Library guidance says generative AI use in project reports and final project assignments must be distinctly declared, including how it was used.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
DTU states that it currently does not have rules specifying which AI tools are allowed or prohibited, and instead emphasizes common sense, the honour code, and clear source attribution.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
DTU states that teachers may use AI when preparing teaching materials.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
DTU says content subject to GDPR or otherwise critical for DTU or individuals should use Copilot for the web.
Review: Agent reviewed
security_review
DTU's tool guidance says an AI tool should go through DTU's official channels before use when a responsible person would impose it on others at DTU.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
How to declare the use of Generative AI
official_guidance checked May 14, 2026
Rules and FAQ | DTU AI Info Hub
official_guidance checked May 14, 2026
Snyd ved eksamen og anden bedømmelse
official_guidance checked May 14, 2026
Tools | DTU AI Info Hub
official_guidance checked May 14, 2026