academic_integrity
NTU DFLL guidance says instructors may decide whether students may use generative AI; if permitted, students should clearly label AI-generated content and follow academic ethics.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
National Taiwan University (NTU)
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
National Taiwan University (NTU) currently has 9 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 12, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
9 claim records
academic_integrity
NTU DFLL guidance says student-submitted theses, works, written reports, technical reports or professional-practice reports should be personally written and created by the student; generative-AI cheating is subject to NTU Academic Regulations Articles 88 and 88-1.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
National Taiwan University guidance says it takes a positive and constructive view of AI tools, encourages teachers to adjust course planning and learning assessment, and says students should understand AI-tool limitations for future learning.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
National Taiwan University guidance recommends that instructors clarify AI-use principles and rules early in the course, preferably in the syllabus, including which activities and assignments may or may not use AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
National Taiwan University guidance says students using ChatGPT for assignments or reports should clearly label AI-generated content, fact-check it, and comply with academic ethics and academic-integrity requirements.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
National Taiwan University guidance says AI-detection tools have limited accuracy and are not sufficient evidence by themselves to confirm student AI use; it recommends caution before accusing students based only on such tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
NTU Health Policy and Management conduct rules allow AI tools according to teaching and research needs, but require users to clearly explain the content and scope of use, respect privacy, disclose assistance sources, verify AI output, and take responsibility for results.
Review: Agent reviewed
research
NTU Social Work journal publication ethics states that AI tools cannot assume responsibility for submitted research; authors remain fully responsible, must disclose AI use in the relevant section, and may not list or cite AI as an author.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
NTU Social Work journal publication ethics says reviewers must not input manuscript content or review-related material into generative AI tools to help write review comments, in order to protect manuscript confidentiality and author rights.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
國立臺灣大學健康政策與管理研究所教學研究行為守則
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 12, 2026, 2:43 PM
國立臺灣大學外國語文學系學生使用生成式AI 參考指引
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 12, 2026, 2:43 PM
臺大社會工作學刊出版倫理聲明
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 12, 2026, 2:43 PM
臺大針對生成式 AI 工具之教學因應措施
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 12, 2026, 2:43 PM