academic_integrity
NTU DFLL guidance says instructors may decide whether students may use generative AI; if permitted, students should clearly label AI-generated content and follow academic ethics.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
National Taiwan University (NTU)
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
National Taiwan University (NTU) currently has 9 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 12, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Claim/evidence diff preview
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
National Taiwan University (NTU) current policy evidence
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
+18-0
11 # National Taiwan University (NTU) AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: NTU DFLL guidance says instructors may decide whether students may use generative AI; if permitted, students should clearly label AI-generated content and follow academic ethics.
3+Evidence (zh-Hant, 82891b0f25ab): 教師於授課及指導學生時，得自行決定是否同意學生使用生成式 AI。如經教師同意，學生應明確標註使用生成式 AI 產出之內容，並遵守學術倫理。學生使用時應註明應用動機、範圍及出處，標註或說明 AI 產生內容於作業、報告或論文之段落。
4+academic_integrity: NTU DFLL guidance says student-submitted theses, works, written reports, technical reports or professional-practice reports should be personally written and created by the student; generative-AI cheating is subject to NTU Academic Regulations Articles 88 and 88-1.
5+Evidence (zh-Hant, 82891b0f25ab): 學生所繳交之論文、作品、書面報告、技術報告或專業實務報告，應由學生親自撰寫且自行創作，如有使用生成式 AI 之舞弊情事，將依國立臺灣大學學則第八十八條及第八十八條之一懲處。
6+teaching: National Taiwan University guidance says it takes a positive and constructive view of AI tools, encourages teachers to adjust course planning and learning assessment, and says students should understand AI-tool limitations for future learning.
7+Evidence (zh-Hant, 318bbe896a40): 針對 AI 工具，臺大採取正面看待與善加利用的態度，鼓勵教師將其視為精進教學的契機，因應新工具的發展適時調整課程規劃，設計出更能反映課程獨特性、且更符合課程目標的教學內容及學習評量；而學生也應該瞭解 AI 工具之使用限制，學習如何妥善運用這些工具以輔助未來的學習。
8+teaching: National Taiwan University guidance recommends that instructors clarify AI-use principles and rules early in the course, preferably in the syllabus, including which activities and assignments may or may not use AI tools.
9+Evidence (zh-Hant, 318bbe896a40): 教師應該先釐清在課程中使用 AI 生成工具的原則和規範，除了透過口頭的說明和提醒讓學生清楚瞭解相關規定，最好也在課程一開始就把相關規定明白標示於課程大綱內，藉以和學生達成共識避免爭議。教師同時需要思考，哪些課堂活動和作業可以或不可以使用 AI 生成工具？
10+academic_integrity: National Taiwan University guidance says students using ChatGPT for assignments or reports should clearly label AI-generated content, fact-check it, and comply with academic ethics and academic-integrity requirements.
11+Evidence (zh-Hant, 318bbe896a40): 使用 ChatGPT 來撰寫課堂作業或報告，應明確標註使用 ChatGPT 產出的內容，讓讀者瞭解作者使用哪些資源來支持自己的論點。使用 AI 生成內容時一定要進行資訊查核，並確保遵守學術倫理及學術誠信的要求，不涉及抄襲或違反著作權。
12+teaching: National Taiwan University guidance says AI-detection tools have limited accuracy and are not sufficient evidence by themselves to confirm student AI use; it recommends caution before accusing students based only on such tools.
13+Evidence (zh-Hant, 318bbe896a40): 目前市面上有多種能夠辨識生成式 AI 內容的工具，例如 GPTZero、Turnitin AI Detection、Writer.com AI Detector、Copyleaks 等。然而，這些工具的準確率仍有相當限制，難以作為確認學生是否使用 AI 工具的充分依據。教師若考慮使用 AI 偵測工具，應格外謹慎，避免單憑工具判斷便對學生提出指控。
14+privacy: NTU Health Policy and Management conduct rules allow AI tools according to teaching and research needs, but require users to clearly explain the content and scope of use, respect privacy, disclose assistance sources, verify AI output, and take responsibility for results.
15+Evidence (zh-Hant, c879a79af0aa): 師生可視教研需求使用 AI 工具，然應清楚說明使用內容與範圍，尊重隱私並揭示協助來源。不論教學、作業或研究，AI 所產內容須由使用者自行查核並負責結果，未揭示使用者視為違反誠信。
16+research: NTU Social Work journal publication ethics states that AI tools cannot assume responsibility for submitted research; authors remain fully responsible, must disclose AI use in the relevant section, and may not list or cite AI as an author.
17+Evidence (zh-Hant, 7608e80d7a9d): 人工智慧（AI）工具無法對所提交的研究成果承擔任何責任。故即使部分內容由 AI 工具產生，作者仍須對整篇稿件內容負完全責任。若作者在論文撰寫、圖像或圖形元素製作，或資料蒐集與分析過程中使用 AI 工具，必須在該章節中揭露其使用方式與所使用的 AI 工具名稱。作者不得將 AI 或 AI 輔助技術列為作者或共同作者，也不得將 AI 作為作者進行引用。
18+privacy: NTU Social Work journal publication ethics says reviewers must not input manuscript content or review-related material into generative AI tools to help write review comments, in order to protect manuscript confidentiality and author rights.
19+Evidence (zh-Hant, 7608e80d7a9d): 審查者不得將稿件內容與審查相關之資料輸入或提供予生成式人工智慧工具協助撰寫審查意見，以確保稿件內容之機密性與作者權益。審查者不得將稿件圖表和表格上傳至生成式人工智慧工具，避免AI技術將輸入的資料用於訓練或其他目的，侵犯同儕審查過程的保密性、作者和審查者的隱私，以及稿件的版權。
Claim changes
9 claim records
academic_integrity
NTU DFLL guidance says student-submitted theses, works, written reports, technical reports or professional-practice reports should be personally written and created by the student; generative-AI cheating is subject to NTU Academic Regulations Articles 88 and 88-1.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
National Taiwan University guidance says it takes a positive and constructive view of AI tools, encourages teachers to adjust course planning and learning assessment, and says students should understand AI-tool limitations for future learning.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
National Taiwan University guidance recommends that instructors clarify AI-use principles and rules early in the course, preferably in the syllabus, including which activities and assignments may or may not use AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
National Taiwan University guidance says students using ChatGPT for assignments or reports should clearly label AI-generated content, fact-check it, and comply with academic ethics and academic-integrity requirements.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
National Taiwan University guidance says AI-detection tools have limited accuracy and are not sufficient evidence by themselves to confirm student AI use; it recommends caution before accusing students based only on such tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
NTU Health Policy and Management conduct rules allow AI tools according to teaching and research needs, but require users to clearly explain the content and scope of use, respect privacy, disclose assistance sources, verify AI output, and take responsibility for results.
Review: Agent reviewed
research
NTU Social Work journal publication ethics states that AI tools cannot assume responsibility for submitted research; authors remain fully responsible, must disclose AI use in the relevant section, and may not list or cite AI as an author.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
NTU Social Work journal publication ethics says reviewers must not input manuscript content or review-related material into generative AI tools to help write review comments, in order to protect manuscript confidentiality and author rights.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
國立臺灣大學健康政策與管理研究所教學研究行為守則
official_guidance checked May 12, 2026
國立臺灣大學外國語文學系學生使用生成式AI 參考指引
official_guidance checked May 12, 2026
臺大社會工作學刊出版倫理聲明
official_guidance checked May 12, 2026
臺大針對生成式 AI 工具之教學因應措施
official_guidance checked May 12, 2026