Taipei, Taiwan Last checked May 12, 2026

National Taiwan University (NTU)

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Can I use AI for my coursework?Conditions and evidence gaps Do I need to disclose AI use?Conditions and evidence gaps Can I upload sensitive data?Conditions and evidence gaps Which tools can I access?Conditions and evidence gaps

Use in ChatGPT ↗Before you submitAdvice and precautions Record updates ↓

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Conditions and evidence gaps

Course AI rules should be stated early. NTU assignment guidance requires labeling and checking AI output; DFLL use depends on instructor decisions.

Official source ↗

Exams

Conditions and evidence gaps

Check which activities or assignments the instructor permits; DFLL guidance cannot be generalized into campus-wide exam permission.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Conditions and evidence gaps

Clearly label AI-generated content and assistance, fact-check outputs and follow the applicable academic-ethics rules.

Official source ↗

Privacy and data

Conditions and evidence gaps

Health Policy and Management rules require privacy safeguards. Social Work journal reviewers must not upload manuscripts or review material to GenAI.

Official source ↗

Institutional tools

Conditions and evidence gaps

The current reviewed Claims do not identify an institutionally available AI service or its access terms.

Research and publication

Conditions and evidence gaps

Social Work journal authors retain responsibility, disclose AI use and cannot list AI as an author. DFLL degree work must be personally written.

Official source ↗

Academic integrity

Conditions and evidence gaps

DFLL rules connect AI cheating to NTU Academic Regulations. University guidance warns AI detectors alone are insufficient evidence.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Conditions and evidence gaps

Explain permitted uses early, adapt teaching and assessment and use caution before relying on AI detectors.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Conditions and evidence gaps

The current reviewed Claims do not specify an AI security-review or procurement procedure.

Additional source context

Context only

These supplementary source quotations provide context. Use the current published Claims for the rule and its applicable scope.

Frozen record evidence

Historical input context

These earlier records provide context; no current investigation, sanction or appeal deadline is established by the published Claims.

Do

Check the instructor’s AI rules for the particular activity.
Site advice
Check the instructor’s AI rules for the particular activity.
Scope
University teaching guidance, DFLL assessment rules, Health Policy and Management rules and Social Work journal ethics have distinct scopes.
National Taiwan University guidance recommends that instructors clarify AI-use principles and rules early in the course, preferably in the syllabus, including which activities and assignments may or may not use AI tools.
Original evidence and scope
National Taiwan University guidance recommends that instructors clarify AI-use principles and rules early in the course, preferably in the syllabus, including which activities and assignments may or may not use AI tools.
claim-ntu-002
教師應該先釐清在課程中使用 AI 生成工具的原則和規範，除了透過口頭的說明和提醒讓學生清楚瞭解相關規定，最好也在課程一開始就把相關規定明白標示於課程大綱內，藉以和學生達成共識避免爭議。教師同時需要思考，哪些課堂活動和作業可以或不可以使用 AI 生成工具？
教師教學面向 / 如何因應學生在課程內使用 AI 生成工具
Official university source ↗
Label and fact-check AI-generated assignment content.
Requirement in this scope
Label and fact-check AI-generated assignment content.
Scope
University teaching guidance, DFLL assessment rules, Health Policy and Management rules and Social Work journal ethics have distinct scopes.
National Taiwan University guidance says students using ChatGPT for assignments or reports should clearly label AI-generated content, fact-check it, and comply with academic ethics and academic-integrity requirements.
Original evidence and scope
National Taiwan University guidance says students using ChatGPT for assignments or reports should clearly label AI-generated content, fact-check it, and comply with academic ethics and academic-integrity requirements.
claim-ntu-004
使用 ChatGPT 來撰寫課堂作業或報告，應明確標註使用 ChatGPT 產出的內容，讓讀者瞭解作者使用哪些資源來支持自己的論點。使用 AI 生成內容時一定要進行資訊查核，並確保遵守學術倫理及學術誠信的要求，不涉及抄襲或違反著作權。
學生學習面向 / 如何正確使用 AI 生成之內容
Official university source ↗
For Social Work journal submissions, disclose AI assistance and retain author responsibility.
Requirement in this scope
For Social Work journal submissions, disclose AI assistance and retain author responsibility.
Scope
University teaching guidance, DFLL assessment rules, Health Policy and Management rules and Social Work journal ethics have distinct scopes.
NTU Social Work journal publication ethics states that AI tools cannot assume responsibility for submitted research; authors remain fully responsible, must disclose AI use in the relevant section, and may not list or cite AI as an author.
Original evidence and scope
NTU Social Work journal publication ethics states that AI tools cannot assume responsibility for submitted research; authors remain fully responsible, must disclose AI use in the relevant section, and may not list or cite AI as an author.
claim-ntu-008
人工智慧（AI）工具無法對所提交的研究成果承擔任何責任。故即使部分內容由 AI 工具產生，作者仍須對整篇稿件內容負完全責任。若作者在論文撰寫、圖像或圖形元素製作，或資料蒐集與分析過程中使用 AI 工具，必須在該章節中揭露其使用方式與所使用的 AI 工具名稱。作者不得將 AI 或 AI 輔助技術列為作者或共同作者，也不得將 AI 作為作者進行引用。
作者的職責 / AI 工具使用
Official university source ↗

Don’t

Do not present AI-written DFLL degree work as personally authored.
Requirement in this scope
Do not present AI-written DFLL degree work as personally authored.
Scope
University teaching guidance, DFLL assessment rules, Health Policy and Management rules and Social Work journal ethics have distinct scopes.
NTU DFLL guidance says student-submitted theses, works, written reports, technical reports or professional-practice reports should be personally written and created by the student; generative-AI cheating is subject to NTU Academic Regulations Articles 88 and 88-1.
Original evidence and scope
NTU DFLL guidance says student-submitted theses, works, written reports, technical reports or professional-practice reports should be personally written and created by the student; generative-AI cheating is subject to NTU Academic Regulations Articles 88 and 88-1.
claim-ntu-006
學生所繳交之論文、作品、書面報告、技術報告或專業實務報告，應由學生親自撰寫且自行創作，如有使用生成式 AI 之舞弊情事，將依國立臺灣大學學則第八十八條及第八十八條之一懲處。
國立臺灣大學外國語文學系學生使用生成式AI 參考指引, item 2
Official university source ↗
As a Social Work journal reviewer, do not upload manuscripts to GenAI.
Requirement in this scope
As a Social Work journal reviewer, do not upload manuscripts to GenAI.
Scope
University teaching guidance, DFLL assessment rules, Health Policy and Management rules and Social Work journal ethics have distinct scopes.
NTU Social Work journal publication ethics says reviewers must not input manuscript content or review-related material into generative AI tools to help write review comments, in order to protect manuscript confidentiality and author rights.
Original evidence and scope
NTU Social Work journal publication ethics says reviewers must not input manuscript content or review-related material into generative AI tools to help write review comments, in order to protect manuscript confidentiality and author rights.
claim-ntu-009
審查者不得將稿件內容與審查相關之資料輸入或提供予生成式人工智慧工具協助撰寫審查意見，以確保稿件內容之機密性與作者權益。審查者不得將稿件圖表和表格上傳至生成式人工智慧工具，避免AI技術將輸入的資料用於訓練或其他目的，侵犯同儕審查過程的保密性、作者和審查者的隱私，以及稿件的版權。
審查者的職責 / AI 工具使用
Official university source ↗
Do not use a detector result alone to establish student AI use.
Source guidance
Do not use a detector result alone to establish student AI use.
Scope
University teaching guidance, DFLL assessment rules, Health Policy and Management rules and Social Work journal ethics have distinct scopes.
National Taiwan University guidance says AI-detection tools have limited accuracy and are not sufficient evidence by themselves to confirm student AI use; it recommends caution before accusing students based only on such tools.
Original evidence and scope
National Taiwan University guidance says AI-detection tools have limited accuracy and are not sufficient evidence by themselves to confirm student AI use; it recommends caution before accusing students based only on such tools.
claim-ntu-003
目前市面上有多種能夠辨識生成式 AI 內容的工具，例如 GPTZero、Turnitin AI Detection、Writer.com AI Detector、Copyleaks 等。然而，這些工具的準確率仍有相當限制，難以作為確認學生是否使用 AI 工具的充分依據。教師若考慮使用 AI 偵測工具，應格外謹慎，避免單憑工具判斷便對學生提出指控。
教師教學面向 / 是否有工具能夠偵測學生的作業內容是否為 AI 生成
Official university source ↗

AI use questioned?Investigation, possible outcomes and appeal

AI tools & access

No source-backed tool record has been established for this university yet. This does not mean AI tools are unavailable or prohibited.

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 3

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

Records cover only part of this period, starting 2026-10-25.

2026-10-27Page update
Other records · Page update
View revision
Loading revision…
2026-10-25Record maintenance
Other records · Record maintenance
View revision
Loading revision…
2026-10-25Record maintenance
Other records · Record maintenance
View revision
Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

Official sources

4 official URLs; 4 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

國立臺灣大學健康政策與管理研究所教學研究行為守則

emha.coph.ntu.edu.tw

University official source

emha.coph.ntu.edu.tw

Hash and captured version

國立臺灣大學健康政策與管理研究所教學研究行為守則 · 2026-05-12T14:43:02Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

c879a79af0aa8ee1d8635b5b626f3b87d7aff51dce520b6724154d687987e476

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

國立臺灣大學外國語文學系學生使用生成式AI 參考指引

www.forex.ntu.edu.tw

University official source

forex.ntu.edu.tw

Hash and captured version

國立臺灣大學外國語文學系學生使用生成式AI 參考指引 · 2026-05-12T14:43:02Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

82891b0f25ab17895e330553d227cb8052851169b0f84c58e78e404b10c29117

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

臺大社會工作學刊出版倫理聲明

ntusw.ntu.edu.tw

University official source

ntusw.ntu.edu.tw

Hash and captured version

臺大社會工作學刊出版倫理聲明 · 2026-05-12T14:43:02Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

7608e80d7a9d5bd5a2d8d3ff8d3a573ce889815c3726d63561ee42066f6db89d

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

臺大針對生成式 AI 工具之教學因應措施

www.dlc.ntu.edu.tw

University official source

dlc.ntu.edu.tw

Hash and captured version

臺大針對生成式 AI 工具之教學因應措施 · 2026-05-12T14:43:02Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

318bbe896a407f2515252add5b3baa244880bfa4eb5b73bd9341216e1f8c0ec0

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state: agent_reviewed
Analysis review state: machine_candidate
Record revision: public-release-20260924-002
Dataset release: public-release-20260924-002
Correction published: 2026-09-24T23:31:02.306Z
Student snapshot: Not published

Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

Institution-wide evidence audit remains PARTIAL. Supplementary quotations are not independently verified by this presentation release.
Current JSON and MCP retain the previous public Claim set. Local candidate corrections and held decisions remain private and pending review.
Source excerpts retain their declared capture limitations. Original official HTTP/PDF bytes were not verified by this release.
Institutional semantic audit remains PARTIAL. Student-facing display is derived from existing published Claims; no new institutional tool record, source verification or strong snapshot approval.

Current reviewed JSON

Questions students ask

Can I use AI for my coursework?

Course AI rules should be stated early. NTU assignment guidance requires labeling and checking AI output; DFLL use depends on instructor decisions.

View evidence →

Do I need to disclose AI use?

Clearly label AI-generated content and assistance, fact-check outputs and follow the applicable academic-ethics rules.

View evidence →

Can I upload sensitive data?

Health Policy and Management rules require privacy safeguards. Social Work journal reviewers must not upload manuscripts or review material to GenAI.

View evidence →

Which tools can I access?