Sapporo, Japan

Hokkaido University

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage6 reviewedEvidence-backed claims6Reviewed6Candidate0Official sources2Source languagejaPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/hokkaido-university.json

Policy profile

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence79%

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

Hokkaido University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records1

Microsoft 365 Copilot

Hokkaido University

Tool
Microsoft 365 Copilot
About
Microsoft 365 Copilot made available through Hokkaido University's administrative-work trial.
Access
Participate through the Hokkaido University DX Office trial; the public announcement does not provide a general self-service activation URL.
Cost
Not stated in the official trial announcement.
Availability
Conditionally allowed
Review
Agent reviewed
Sources

Evidence-backed claims

6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft 365 Copilot is listed for Hokkaido University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot_for_m365","rawToolName":"Microsoft 365 Copilot","description":"Microsoft 365 Copilot made available through Hokkaido University's administrative-work trial.","howToObtain":"Participate through the Hokkaido University DX Office trial; the public announcement does not provide a general self-service activation URL.","costToUser":"Not stated in the official trial announcement.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Evidencia original

Evidence 1
北海道大学のDX業務推進室は、公式にMicrosoft 365 Copilotの業務利用試行を開始し、2025年1月から9月を試行期間として職員20名を参加者に含めると説明している。Official endorsement: this is a limited, conditionally allowed university pilot.

Vista localizada only

北海道大学のDX業務推進室は、公式にMicrosoft 365 Copilotの業務利用試行を開始し、2025年1月から9月を試行期間として職員20名を参加者に含めると説明している。Official endorsement: this is a limited, conditionally allowed university pilot.

Privacy

When generative AI is used to assist with grading submitted assignments, Hokkaido University's notes warn faculty not to enter students' personal or private information because entered data may be stored and output to other users.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: no_student_personal_private_information_in_genai_grading_assistance

Evidencia original

Evidence 1
学生の提出した課題の採点補助に生成系AIを用いる場合、システムが利用者の入力したデータを蓄積し、他のユーザに対して出力することも想定されるため、学生の個人情報などプライバシーに関わる情報を入力しないよう留意する。

Vista localizada only

When generative AI is used to assist grading, faculty should not enter students' personal or private information because input data may be stored and output to other users.

Academic Integrity

For student use, Hokkaido University's notes say students preparing reports and other assignments should follow the instructor's guidance and instructions regarding generative AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: students_follow_instructor_guidance_for_assignments

Evidencia original

Evidence 1
授業レポート等の課題作成に当たっては、生成系AI使用に関して、担当教員からの注意、指示に従うこと。

Vista localizada only

When preparing course reports and other assignments, students should follow the instructor's cautions and instructions regarding generative AI use.

Teaching

For faculty use, Hokkaido University's notes say instructors should explain in advance whether generative AI is permitted in class and how it is restricted, and should consider grading fairness when students use it in assignments or practical learning.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: faculty_should_explain_permissions_restrictions_and_grading_fairness

Evidencia original

Evidence 1
授業において学生に対し、生成系AIの使用の許可や制限についてあらかじめ説明し、学生が課題や実習で生成系AIを利用した場合の、成績評価の公平性を保つように配慮する。

Vista localizada only

Faculty should explain in advance whether generative AI is permitted or restricted in class and should consider grading fairness if students use it in assignments or practical learning.

Ai Tool Treatment

Hokkaido University's 2023 notes encourage faculty and students to explore generative AI methods that can enhance education and learning, while using the technology cautiously in light of educational concerns.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: encourages_cautious_education_learning_use

Evidencia original

Evidence 1
本学の教員及び学生のみなさまには、生成系AIの利用に際し、本学の教育理念に照らしながら、このような技術を用いて教育学習を高度化する手法を探究すると同時に、教育利用についての懸念を踏まえ、慎重な利用を心がけてください。

Vista localizada only

Faculty and students are asked to explore methods for enhancing education and learning with generative AI while using it cautiously in light of educational concerns.

Academic Integrity

Hokkaido University's notes warn students that ChatGPT-like outputs may unknowingly plagiarize internet text, may contain inaccuracies, and may have unclear or inaccurate sources.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: warns_plagiarism_inaccuracy_unclear_sources

Evidencia original

Evidence 1
ChatGPT等のツールの出力は、インターネットで収集したテキストを用いたデータベース(コーパス)を用いて作られるため、インターネット上に掲載された他人の文章等を知らないうちに盗用する可能性があることに留意する。

Vista localizada only

Students should note that outputs from tools such as ChatGPT are generated from internet text corpora and may unknowingly plagiarize other people's writings.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

2 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedJul 16, 2026Last changedJul 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities