University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Idioma
ENZHFRPL

Registro de cambios

University of Limerick

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteÚltima verificación16 may 2026Último cambio16 may 2026Afirmaciones6Fuentes5Registros de versiones0
Página universitariaJSON públicoInforme mensualÍndice universitario

Resumen de cambios

Estado actual de actualización y revisión del registro público.

University of Limerick currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 16 may 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Esta página combina todas las diferencias de versiones públicas para University of Limerick. Las instantáneas individuales de lanzamiento siguen disponibles desde sus URL específicas del lanzamiento.

Aún no se han registrado filas de diferencias de políticas entre versiones para esta universidad. La página sigue rastreando afirmaciones respaldadas por fuentes actuales, atribuciones de fuentes oficiales, estado de revisión, actualidad de las fuentes y JSON públicas para su descubrimiento y citación.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen muestran cambios de hash para la misma URL de origen y no constituyen por sí mismos cambios en la política.

Categorías de diferencias

Clasificación semántica para esta diferencia de versión.

Texto de la política0Extraído recientemente0Evidencia0Instantáneas de origen0Texto de origen0Fuente añadida0Fuente eliminada0

Diferencias de versión combinadas

Diferencia del seguimiento unificado generada a partir de todas las instantáneas de lanzamiento público para esta universidad.

Universidad of Limerick combined release diferencias

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+12-0
11 # University of Limerick AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: University of Limerick assessment guidance states that use of AI in an unauthorized manner is a breach of academic integrity, and that use not permitted by the module leader is a breach of academic integrity.
3+Evidence (en, 895db1df092c): The Academic Integrity Policy and the Procedures for Managing Allegations of Academic Misconduct, available on the UL Policy hub, indicate that it is a breach of academic integrity if AI is used in an unauthorised manner. In other words, it is the responsibility of the module leader/equivalent to decide and communicate the level of acceptable use of AI to students i.e. to determine what is authorised/unauthorised use.
4+academic_integrity: University of Limerick guidance says GenAI use in assessment beyond the specifications of the module lead or programme lead is considered academic misconduct and related concerns should be managed under the procedures for academic misconduct allegations.
5+Evidence (en, 07c65bc24d73): The use of Gen AI in assessment beyond the specifications of the module lead and/or programme lead is considered to be a form of academic misconduct, as described in the Academic Integrity Policy. Concerns relating to the unauthorised use of GenAI should be managed in accordance with the Procedures for Managing Allegations of Academic Misconduct.
6+security_review: UL GenAI principles state that any tool used within the university must comply with UL data protection, IT security, and acceptable usage policies, and that cloud tools must be approved through the Cloud Governance process.
7+Evidence (en, 9a0425f7b5d3): The use of any tool within the University must be compliant with the UL Data Protection Policy, IT Security Policy, and the Acceptable Usage Policy. All tools being used within the University must go through the appropriate approval processes. Tools with a cloud aspect must be approved through the Cloud Governance process.
8+ai_tool_treatment: UL student guidance says Microsoft Copilot accessed through UL staff or student accounts is currently the preferred GenAI platform from a security and data integrity standpoint when GenAI is used by staff or students.
9+Evidence (en, 7bbfcf4b6a59): From a security and data integrity standpoint, if Gen AI is to be used by staff or students, the preferred platform is currently Microsoft Copilot, accessed through UL staff or student accounts. UL maintains a contractual agreement with Microsoft, a distinction not shared with other providers.
10+research: UL guidance states that outputs from GenAI tools relied on for essential information, decision-making, or research must be independently verified.
11+Evidence (en, 3fb3c0866dd3): As a result, all outputs from Gen AI tools which we rely on for essential information or which will inform decisions or influence research must be independently verified.
12+teaching: University of Limerick guidance says legitimate AI use in academia is a local decision, with module coordinators, programme leads, or Heads of Department setting limits within module or programme design.
13+Evidence (en, 3fb3c0866dd3): Given the variety of offerings, disciplines and courses, the question of legitimate use of AI within academia, will inevitably be a local decision. That is, a module coordinator, programme lead or Head of Department, will dictate the limits of legitimate uses of AI within module or programme design, in keeping with the module or programme aims and content.

Historial de versiones

0 public release diffs

Cambios en las afirmaciones

6 Afirmación registros

academic_integrity

University of Limerick assessment guidance states that use of AI in an unauthorized manner is a breach of academic integrity, and that use not permitted by the module leader is a breach of academic integrity.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza97%Evidencia1Idiomasen

academic_integrity

University of Limerick guidance says GenAI use in assessment beyond the specifications of the module lead or programme lead is considered academic misconduct and related concerns should be managed under the procedures for academic misconduct allegations.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza96%Evidencia1Idiomasen

security_review

UL GenAI principles state that any tool used within the university must comply with UL data protection, IT security, and acceptable usage policies, and that cloud tools must be approved through the Cloud Governance process.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza96%Evidencia1Idiomasen

ai_tool_treatment

UL student guidance says Microsoft Copilot accessed through UL staff or student accounts is currently the preferred GenAI platform from a security and data integrity standpoint when GenAI is used by staff or students.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%Evidencia1Idiomasen

research

UL guidance states that outputs from GenAI tools relied on for essential information, decision-making, or research must be independently verified.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%Evidencia1Idiomasen

teaching

University of Limerick guidance says legitimate AI use in academia is a local decision, with module coordinators, programme leads, or Heads of Department setting limits within module or programme design.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%Evidencia1Idiomasen

Instantáneas de origen

5 source attributions