University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Change log

University of Limerick

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Claims6Sources5Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Limerick currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for University of Limerick. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

University of Limerick combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+12-0
11 # University of Limerick AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: University of Limerick assessment guidance states that use of AI in an unauthorized manner is a breach of academic integrity, and that use not permitted by the module leader is a breach of academic integrity.
3+Evidence (en, 895db1df092c): The Academic Integrity Policy and the Procedures for Managing Allegations of Academic Misconduct, available on the UL Policy hub, indicate that it is a breach of academic integrity if AI is used in an unauthorised manner. In other words, it is the responsibility of the module leader/equivalent to decide and communicate the level of acceptable use of AI to students i.e. to determine what is authorised/unauthorised use.
4+academic_integrity: University of Limerick guidance says GenAI use in assessment beyond the specifications of the module lead or programme lead is considered academic misconduct and related concerns should be managed under the procedures for academic misconduct allegations.
5+Evidence (en, 07c65bc24d73): The use of Gen AI in assessment beyond the specifications of the module lead and/or programme lead is considered to be a form of academic misconduct, as described in the Academic Integrity Policy. Concerns relating to the unauthorised use of GenAI should be managed in accordance with the Procedures for Managing Allegations of Academic Misconduct.
6+security_review: UL GenAI principles state that any tool used within the university must comply with UL data protection, IT security, and acceptable usage policies, and that cloud tools must be approved through the Cloud Governance process.
7+Evidence (en, 9a0425f7b5d3): The use of any tool within the University must be compliant with the UL Data Protection Policy, IT Security Policy, and the Acceptable Usage Policy. All tools being used within the University must go through the appropriate approval processes. Tools with a cloud aspect must be approved through the Cloud Governance process.
8+ai_tool_treatment: UL student guidance says Microsoft Copilot accessed through UL staff or student accounts is currently the preferred GenAI platform from a security and data integrity standpoint when GenAI is used by staff or students.
9+Evidence (en, 7bbfcf4b6a59): From a security and data integrity standpoint, if Gen AI is to be used by staff or students, the preferred platform is currently Microsoft Copilot, accessed through UL staff or student accounts. UL maintains a contractual agreement with Microsoft, a distinction not shared with other providers.
10+research: UL guidance states that outputs from GenAI tools relied on for essential information, decision-making, or research must be independently verified.
11+Evidence (en, 3fb3c0866dd3): As a result, all outputs from Gen AI tools which we rely on for essential information or which will inform decisions or influence research must be independently verified.
12+teaching: University of Limerick guidance says legitimate AI use in academia is a local decision, with module coordinators, programme leads, or Heads of Department setting limits within module or programme design.
13+Evidence (en, 3fb3c0866dd3): Given the variety of offerings, disciplines and courses, the question of legitimate use of AI within academia, will inevitably be a local decision. That is, a module coordinator, programme lead or Head of Department, will dictate the limits of legitimate uses of AI within module or programme design, in keeping with the module or programme aims and content.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

6 claim records

academic_integrity

University of Limerick assessment guidance states that use of AI in an unauthorized manner is a breach of academic integrity, and that use not permitted by the module leader is a breach of academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Limerick guidance says GenAI use in assessment beyond the specifications of the module lead or programme lead is considered academic misconduct and related concerns should be managed under the procedures for academic misconduct allegations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

UL GenAI principles state that any tool used within the university must comply with UL data protection, IT security, and acceptable usage policies, and that cloud tools must be approved through the Cloud Governance process.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

UL student guidance says Microsoft Copilot accessed through UL staff or student accounts is currently the preferred GenAI platform from a security and data integrity standpoint when GenAI is used by staff or students.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

research

UL guidance states that outputs from GenAI tools relied on for essential information, decision-making, or research must be independently verified.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

University of Limerick guidance says legitimate AI use in academia is a local decision, with module coordinators, programme leads, or Heads of Department setting limits within module or programme design.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

5 source attributions