academic_integrity
Birkbeck's student AI guidance states that the AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including assessments where the brief permits no AI use.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
Registro de cambios
Birkbeck, University of London
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Resumen de cambios
Estado actual de actualización y revisión del registro público.
Birkbeck, University of London currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 16 may 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
Esta página combina todas las diferencias de versiones públicas para Birkbeck, University of London. Las instantáneas individuales de lanzamiento siguen disponibles desde sus URL específicas del lanzamiento.
Aún no se han registrado filas de diferencias de políticas entre versiones para esta universidad. La página sigue rastreando afirmaciones respaldadas por fuentes actuales, atribuciones de fuentes oficiales, estado de revisión, actualidad de las fuentes y JSON públicas para su descubrimiento y citación.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen muestran cambios de hash para la misma URL de origen y no constituyen por sí mismos cambios en la política.
Categorías de diferencias
Clasificación semántica para esta diferencia de versión.
Diferencias de versión combinadas
Diferencia del seguimiento unificado generada a partir de todas las instantáneas de lanzamiento público para esta universidad.
Birkbeck, University of London combined release diferencias
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+8-0
11 # Birkbeck, University of London AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Birkbeck's student AI guidance states that the AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including assessments where the brief permits no AI use.
3+Evidence (en, d6f6bbed3b6f): The AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including those where no AI use is permitted by the Assessment Brief.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should use AI tools, including generative AI, only to the extent outlined in the assessment brief, and should not use them where the brief explicitly does not permit them.
5+Evidence (en, d6f6bbed3b6f): You should only use AI tools, including generative AI, to the extent that has been outlined in the assessment brief. Some assessments will permit the use of AI tools for some aspects of your work, while others will not permit any use of AI tools at all.
6+academic_integrity: Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should retain evidence of their use of AI tools, such as transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs, because it may be requested if work is flagged for possible academic misconduct.
7+Evidence (en, d6f6bbed3b6f): You should retain evidence of your use of AI tools including generative AI. This could be in the form of transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs.
8+academic_integrity: Birkbeck's Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy includes using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to create assessment content or argument presented as the student's own intellectual work within its description of contract cheating, unless generative AI use is permitted in the assessment brief with guidance.
9+Evidence (en, 1a7ec093d7a8): This might include using generative artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT to create content and/or argument for your assessment which you then present as your own intellectual work. If you are permitted to use generative AI tools to create content, this will be included in the assessment brief with guidance.
Historial de versiones
0 public release diffs
Cambios en las afirmaciones
4 Afirmación registros
ai_tool_treatment
Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should use AI tools, including generative AI, only to the extent outlined in the assessment brief, and should not use them where the brief explicitly does not permit them.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
academic_integrity
Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should retain evidence of their use of AI tools, such as transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs, because it may be requested if work is flagged for possible academic misconduct.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
academic_integrity
Birkbeck's Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy includes using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to create assessment content or argument presented as the student's own intellectual work within its description of contract cheating, unless generative AI use is permitted in the assessment brief with guidance.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
Instantáneas de origen
2 source attributions
Academic Integrity and Misconduct (AIM) Policy and Procedures
official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 may 2026, 18:36
AI guidance for students, 2025-26 academic year
official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 may 2026, 18:36