London, United Kingdom Sidst tjekket

University College London (UCL)

Uafhængig · Åben adgang · Ikke en officiel universitetsside

Hvad vil du gerne kontrollere?

Søg universiteter

Gennemse den aktuelle post efter emne

AI-anvendelse i opgaver og bedømmelser

Betinget tilladt

Følg bedømmelsesvejledningen. Kategori 1 udelukker GenAI under udførelsen; Kategori 2 tillader begrænset, kritisk assistance, mens den studerende forbliver forfatteren; Kategori 3 gør GenAI integreret. Kategorierne er vejledende. Sproglig støtte har undtagelser vedrørende bedømte færdigheder og substantielt indhold.

Officiel kilde ↗

Eksamen

Vurderingsspecifik

Tilladelser til eksamen følger opgavebeskrivelsen. Eksamener, tests og mundtlige prøver, der afholdes fysisk, er eksempler på kategori 1, ikke en generel standard. CLIE-mundtlige vurderinger og vurderinger under tilsyn er kategori 1, medmindre andet er angivet. Individuelle undtagelser for hjælpemidler skal præciseres.

Officiel kilde ↗

Oplysning om brug

Anerkendelse påkrævet

Angivelse skal altid ske, når GenAI er blevet brugt som funktionelt værktøj til at hjælpe med at skabe akademisk arbejde (udkast, planlægning, strukturering). Minimumsangivelsen skal omfatte værktøjets navn og version, udgiver, URL og en enkelt sætning om sammenhængen. Hvor standardhenvisningsstile (APA, Chicago) eller afdelingernes retningslinjer kræver det, kan GenAI-værktøjet citeres som forfatter ud over den funktionelle angivelse.

Officiel kilde ↗

Privatliv og følsomme data

Tjek kildespecifikke betingelser

Meddelelsen om Copilot fra marts 2024 beskriver databeskyttelse under UCL-login og opfordrer til forsigtighed; den verificerer ikke de aktuelle indstillinger for kontoopbevaring. Studerende skal overholde UCL's krav til databeskyttelse, når de bruger følsomme data; godkendelser eller samtykker kan være påkrævet.

Officiel kilde ↗

Godkendte værktøjer

Adgang underlagt betingelser

UCL anbefaler Copilot og Studiosity. Studiosity tilbyder 24/7 ubegrænset feedback på skrivning/kildehenvisning via Moodle og anfører, at studerendes arbejde ikke anvendes til at træne dets AI. Dets privatlivsmeddelelse omfatter opbevaret tjenesteindhold og oversøisk behandling. Adgang er ikke bedømmelsestilladelse.

Officiel kilde ↗

Forskning og publicering

Udgiverspecifik og uddannelsesspecifik

Ph.d.-studerende oplyser om funktionelle eksterne bidrag, bevarer ansvaret og besvarer viva-spørgsmål uden AI-støtte. UCL Press har separate regler for bog-/tidsskriftforfatterskab, oplysningspligt og billeder; undtagelser for tidsskriftsmetodologi og forpligtelser for bog- versus tidsskriftsbedømmere adskiller sig.

Officiel kilde ↗
Flere gennemgåede emner

Akademisk integritet

Følg den relevante procedure

Standard for utilbørlig fordel i henhold til Academic Manual Section 9; formel undersøgende viva ved mistanke om forfatterskabsovertrædelser.

Officiel kilde ↗

Undervisningsvejledning

Opgavespecifikke restriktioner

Medarbejdere må ikke uploade studenterarbejde til AI-detektionsværktøjer eller GenAI-tjenester. Det frarådes at rette opgaver med GenAI.

Officiel kilde ↗

Sikkerhed og indkøb

Delvist dokumenteret

Institutionelle Copilot-legitimationer og daterede beskyttelsespåstande er dokumenteret. Den aktuelle indkøbskontrakt og tenant-indstillinger er ikke verificeret.

Officiel kilde ↗

Inden du indsender

Gør

  • Følg opgavebeskrivelsen og afklar undtagelser for kompenserende teknologi.
    Råd fra dette websted
  • Angiv funktionel AI-assistance med de krævede oplysninger.
    Krav inden for dette område
  • Ph.d.-kandidater bør kontrollere erklærings- og uafhængige viva-krav.
    Råd fra dette websted

Undlad

  • Antag ikke, at sproglig gennemgang er tilladt i opgaver med sprogbedømmelse.
    Råd fra dette websted
  • Medarbejdere må ikke uploade studenterarbejder til GenAI-tjenester eller AI-detektionstjenester.
    Krav inden for dette område
  • Anvend ikke billedregler for bogudgivelser uden at tjekke undtagelser for tidsskriftsmetodologi.
    Råd fra dette websted

Sættes der spørgsmålstegn ved AI-brug?

UCL

Læs hver citeret regel for dens kursus, faglige enhed, aktivitet og undtagelser. Vejledning på webstedet skaber ikke en forpligtelse for universitetet.

Undersøgelse og håndtering

Ved en Investigatory Viva skal sekretæren fremsende invitationen, rapporten og beviserne mindst fem arbejdsdage forinden. Fremmøde er obligatorisk, og den mundtlige høring kan ikke afholdes i den studerendes fravær. Tilrettelæggelse bør ske inden for 20 arbejdsdage efter resultatet af Fase 1, medmindre rimelige omstændigheder forhindrer dette. Fase 3-klager skal indsendes inden for 10 arbejdsdage efter modtagelse af formel underretning. Resultater udstedes normalt inden for 20 arbejdsdage efter meddelelse om berettigelse, idet anbefalinger er underlagt eksamensudvalgets bekræftelse.

Oprindelig dokumentation og område

Ved en Investigatory Viva skal sekretæren fremsende invitationen, rapporten og beviserne mindst fem arbejdsdage forinden. Fremmøde er obligatorisk, og den mundtlige høring kan ikke afholdes i den studerendes fravær. Tilrettelæggelse bør ske inden for 20 arbejdsdage efter resultatet af Fase 1, medmindre rimelige omstændigheder forhindrer dette. Fase 3-klager skal indsendes inden for 10 arbejdsdage efter modtagelse af formel underretning. Resultater udstedes normalt inden for 20 arbejdsdage efter meddelelse om berettigelse, idet anbefalinger er underlagt eksamensudvalgets bekræftelse.

clm-ucl-genai-investigatory-viva-procedure-2026-27
In cases where authorship is in question (normally allegations of Contract Cheating and Misuse of GenAI), the Department/Faculty will organise an Investigatory Viva and the Secretary will prepare the paperwork and invite the student to attend.

Continuous extracted-text characters 15704–15947; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 135–135; characters 15704–15947; excerpt offset 0–243

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
3. The purpose of the Investigatory Viva is to establish the student’s authorship of the submitted work and make a decision on the case when it is Minor. For Major cases it is to determine whether there is prima facie evidence to support lack of authorship for further consideration at an Academic Misconduct Panel (via the Casework Team).

Continuous extracted-text characters 15950–16289; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 136–136; characters 15950–16289; excerpt offset 0–339

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
4. The Secretary must provide the student with the following at least five working days before the scheduled Investigatory Viva:

Continuous extracted-text characters 16292–16420; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 137–137; characters 16292–16420; excerpt offset 0–128

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
1. An invitation to the Investigatory Viva, outlining the date, time, and location.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16425–16508; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 138–138; characters 16425–16508; excerpt offset 0–83

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
2. A completed Student Academic Misconduct Report Form.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16513–16568; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 139–139; characters 16513–16568; excerpt offset 0–55

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
3. A copy of all documentary evidence relating to the case (i.e. the student’s submission).

Continuous extracted-text characters 16573–16664; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 140–140; characters 16573–16664; excerpt offset 0–91

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
5. A student’s attendance at an Investigatory Viva is mandatory and cannot be conducted in their absence. Failure to attend will result in the actions under section 5 paragraph 16 and 17 being taken.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16667–16866; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 141–141; characters 16667–16866; excerpt offset 0–199

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
6. An Investigatory Viva should be organised within 20 working days from the date of the Stage 1 outcome, unless there are reasonable circumstances that prevent this.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16869–17035; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 142–142; characters 16869–17035; excerpt offset 0–166

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
7. The Investigatory Viva should be constituted as follows:

Continuous extracted-text characters 17038–17097; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 143–143; characters 17038–17097; excerpt offset 0–59

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
1. Chair of the Board of Examiners owning the affected module, or appropriate nominee where there is a conflict of interest (acting as Chair).

Continuous extracted-text characters 17102–17244; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 144–144; characters 17102–17244; excerpt offset 0–142

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
2. At least two other members of staff from the Department not directly involved in the teaching of the affected module(s).

Continuous extracted-text characters 17249–17372; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 145–145; characters 17249–17372; excerpt offset 0–123

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
8. The quorum for the Investigatory Viva must be three including the Chair.

Continuous extracted-text characters 17375–17450; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 146–146; characters 17375–17450; excerpt offset 0–75

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
9. Where deemed necessary, a Departmental Representative who is competent to assess the student’s knowledge and understanding of the work or the allegation may be invited to attend in an advisory capacity. The Departmental Representative may, at the discretion of the Chair, ask the student questions, but will not be involved in the panel’s decision making.

Continuous extracted-text characters 17453–17811; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 147–147; characters 17453–17811; excerpt offset 0–358

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
10. A decision will be made by the Investigatory Viva after their private deliberations and decide one of the following outcomes:

Continuous extracted-text characters 17814–17943; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 148–148; characters 17814–17943; excerpt offset 0–129

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
1. No Further Action

Continuous extracted-text characters 17948–17968; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 149–149; characters 17948–17968; excerpt offset 0–20

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
2. To apply a penalty in line with Section 6 (where the allegation is Minor)

Continuous extracted-text characters 17973–18049; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 150–150; characters 17973–18049; excerpt offset 0–76

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
3. To refer to an Academic Misconduct Panel via Casework (where the Investigatory Viva is investigating a Major case)

Continuous extracted-text characters 18054–18171; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 151–151; characters 18054–18171; excerpt offset 0–117

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
11. The decision of the Investigatory Viva will be by majority vote, and in the case of a tie, the Chair of the Investigatory Viva will have the casting vote.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18174–18332; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 152–152; characters 18174–18332; excerpt offset 0–158

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
12. The Secretary should record the rationale for the decision and for any penalty applied.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18335–18426; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 153–153; characters 18335–18426; excerpt offset 0–91

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
13. The Secretary should inform the student of the Investigatory Viva decision within five working days and record this on the module minutes in Portico.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18429–18582; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 154–154; characters 18429–18582; excerpt offset 0–153

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
14. Students may appeal an Investigatory Viva penalty under Section 7: Stage 3 (Appeal Review).

Continuous extracted-text characters 18585–18680; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 155–155; characters 18585–18680; excerpt offset 0–95

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
15. For Major Cases being investigated at an Investigatory Viva, if prima facie evidence of lack of authorship is found to exist, the findings and all the relevant documentation must be forwarded to the Secretary of the Academic Misconduct Panel via the Casework Team for adjudication.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18683–18968; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 156–156; characters 18683–18968; excerpt offset 0–285

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
16. Where a student fails to attend a Viva, they may be referred to the Mandatory Faculty Interview process for a meeting with the Faculty. The purpose of the meeting is to outline the importance of engagement with the Academic Misconduct process. Following this meeting, the student will be sent a new date, time, and location of the rescheduled Viva. Alternatively, where the allegation is Minor and the student accepts the allegation, the Department may apply a penalty in line with Section 6.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18971–19467; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 157–157; characters 18971–19467; excerpt offset 0–496

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
17. Continued non-engagement with the Viva process may result in Suspension or Termination of Studies via the Mandatory Faculty Interview process.

Continuous extracted-text characters 19470–19616; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 158–158; characters 19470–19616; excerpt offset 0–146

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
5. A student’s attendance at an Investigatory Viva is mandatory and cannot be conducted in their absence. Failure to attend will result in the actions under section 5 paragraph 16 and 17 being taken.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16667–16866; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 141–141; characters 16667–16866; excerpt offset 0–199

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
6. An Investigatory Viva should be organised within 20 working days from the date of the Stage 1 outcome, unless there are reasonable circumstances that prevent this.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16869–17035; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 142–142; characters 16869–17035; excerpt offset 0–166

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
4. The Secretary must provide the student with the following at least five working days before the scheduled Investigatory Viva:

Continuous extracted-text characters 16292–16420; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 137–137; characters 16292–16420; excerpt offset 0–128

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
An Appeal Review is a paper-based review of the decision made at either Stage 1 or Stage 2. An appeal against an Academic Misconduct decision will only be heard if it is based on one or more of the following grounds:

Continuous extracted-text characters 26453–26669; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 210–210; characters 26453–26669; excerpt offset 0–216

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
1. The decision or panel process was not conducted in accordance with the procedures.

Continuous extracted-text characters 26674–26759; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 211–211; characters 26674–26759; excerpt offset 0–85

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
2. Fresh evidence has become available which was not available and could not reasonably be available for consideration during the decision or panel process.

Continuous extracted-text characters 26764–26920; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 212–212; characters 26764–26920; excerpt offset 0–156

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
3. The judgement of misconduct was not reasonable given the circumstances of the case.

Continuous extracted-text characters 26925–27011; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 213–213; characters 26925–27011; excerpt offset 0–86

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
4. The penalty will have a significant impact on the student given their specific circumstances (this applies to decisions that lead to non-progression or suspension/termination of studies).

Continuous extracted-text characters 27016–27206; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 214–214; characters 27016–27206; excerpt offset 0–190

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
##### Student Submission and Eligibility

Continuous extracted-text characters 27207–27247; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 215–215; characters 27207–27247; excerpt offset 0–40

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
2. Students must, within 10 working days of receiving formal notification of the decision, submit an appeal via the ‘UCL Student Academic Misconduct Procedure - Appeal Form†forms.office.com ’.

Continuous extracted-text characters 27250–27442; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 216–216; characters 27250–27442; excerpt offset 0–192

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
3. The Casework Team will conduct an eligibility review of the request. If it is determined that the request review does not fall within the grounds for review and/or does not meet the on-time criterion of 10 working days, the Casework Team will notify the student that the review request will not be taken forward. This means that a case will not progress to considerations at Stage 3 and a Completion of Procedures Letter will be issued.

Continuous extracted-text characters 27445–27884; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 217–217; characters 27445–27884; excerpt offset 0–439

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
##### Consideration of Appeal Review

Continuous extracted-text characters 27885–27921; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 218–218; characters 27885–27921; excerpt offset 0–36

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
4. If it is determined that the request review falls within the grounds for review, the case will be allocated to a member of the Casework Team, who is normally a Senior Casework Officer, for consideration.

Continuous extracted-text characters 27925–28131; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 220–220; characters 27925–28131; excerpt offset 0–206

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
5. The paper-based review will be considered on the basis of the student’s written statement and supporting evidence.

Continuous extracted-text characters 28134–28251; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 221–221; characters 28134–28251; excerpt offset 0–117

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
##### Appeal Review Outcome

Continuous extracted-text characters 28252–28279; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 222–222; characters 28252–28279; excerpt offset 0–27

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
6. Following the investigation, the Stage 3 Appeal Review may be upheld, partially upheld or not upheld. This decision will normally be issued within 20 working days of the student having been informed that the case is eligible for review.

Continuous extracted-text characters 28282–28521; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 223–223; characters 28282–28521; excerpt offset 0–239

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
7. If any aspect of the Stage 3 Appeal Review has been found upheld in full or in parts, then the outcome letter will make recommendations for what UCL will do to put things right. This decision may not be in line with the desired outcome as requested by the student. Recommendations by the Casework Team are subject to confirmation from the relevant Exam Board or equivalent academic body before implementation.

Continuous extracted-text characters 28524–28936; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 224–224; characters 28524–28936; excerpt offset 0–412

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
8. Where a review request is not upheld, then the outcome letter will explain how that decision has been reached.

Continuous extracted-text characters 28939–29052; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 225–225; characters 28939–29052; excerpt offset 0–113

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
9. If an appeal outcome leads to a necessary revision in a student’s certificate or transcript, the student must return any originals before updated versions can be issued.

Continuous extracted-text characters 29055–29227; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 226–226; characters 29055–29227; excerpt offset 0–172

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
10. The outcome of the Stage 3 Review will conclude UCL’s consideration of the case and will be confirmed in the form of a Completion of Procedures letter.

Continuous extracted-text characters 29230–29385; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 227–227; characters 29230–29385; excerpt offset 0–155

Officiel universitetskilde ↗

Mulige udfald

Den dokumentation, der aktuelt er gemt, indeholder ingen verificeret specifik procedure eller frist. Se de gældende universitetsregler.

Gennemgang & klage

Ved en Investigatory Viva skal sekretæren fremsende invitationen, rapporten og beviserne mindst fem arbejdsdage forinden. Fremmøde er obligatorisk, og den mundtlige høring kan ikke afholdes i den studerendes fravær. Tilrettelæggelse bør ske inden for 20 arbejdsdage efter resultatet af Fase 1, medmindre rimelige omstændigheder forhindrer dette. Fase 3-klager skal indsendes inden for 10 arbejdsdage efter modtagelse af formel underretning. Resultater udstedes normalt inden for 20 arbejdsdage efter meddelelse om berettigelse, idet anbefalinger er underlagt eksamensudvalgets bekræftelse.

Oprindelig dokumentation og område

Ved en Investigatory Viva skal sekretæren fremsende invitationen, rapporten og beviserne mindst fem arbejdsdage forinden. Fremmøde er obligatorisk, og den mundtlige høring kan ikke afholdes i den studerendes fravær. Tilrettelæggelse bør ske inden for 20 arbejdsdage efter resultatet af Fase 1, medmindre rimelige omstændigheder forhindrer dette. Fase 3-klager skal indsendes inden for 10 arbejdsdage efter modtagelse af formel underretning. Resultater udstedes normalt inden for 20 arbejdsdage efter meddelelse om berettigelse, idet anbefalinger er underlagt eksamensudvalgets bekræftelse.

clm-ucl-genai-investigatory-viva-procedure-2026-27
In cases where authorship is in question (normally allegations of Contract Cheating and Misuse of GenAI), the Department/Faculty will organise an Investigatory Viva and the Secretary will prepare the paperwork and invite the student to attend.

Continuous extracted-text characters 15704–15947; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 135–135; characters 15704–15947; excerpt offset 0–243

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
3. The purpose of the Investigatory Viva is to establish the student’s authorship of the submitted work and make a decision on the case when it is Minor. For Major cases it is to determine whether there is prima facie evidence to support lack of authorship for further consideration at an Academic Misconduct Panel (via the Casework Team).

Continuous extracted-text characters 15950–16289; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 136–136; characters 15950–16289; excerpt offset 0–339

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
4. The Secretary must provide the student with the following at least five working days before the scheduled Investigatory Viva:

Continuous extracted-text characters 16292–16420; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 137–137; characters 16292–16420; excerpt offset 0–128

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
1. An invitation to the Investigatory Viva, outlining the date, time, and location.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16425–16508; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 138–138; characters 16425–16508; excerpt offset 0–83

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
2. A completed Student Academic Misconduct Report Form.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16513–16568; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 139–139; characters 16513–16568; excerpt offset 0–55

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
3. A copy of all documentary evidence relating to the case (i.e. the student’s submission).

Continuous extracted-text characters 16573–16664; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 140–140; characters 16573–16664; excerpt offset 0–91

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
5. A student’s attendance at an Investigatory Viva is mandatory and cannot be conducted in their absence. Failure to attend will result in the actions under section 5 paragraph 16 and 17 being taken.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16667–16866; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 141–141; characters 16667–16866; excerpt offset 0–199

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
6. An Investigatory Viva should be organised within 20 working days from the date of the Stage 1 outcome, unless there are reasonable circumstances that prevent this.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16869–17035; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 142–142; characters 16869–17035; excerpt offset 0–166

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
7. The Investigatory Viva should be constituted as follows:

Continuous extracted-text characters 17038–17097; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 143–143; characters 17038–17097; excerpt offset 0–59

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
1. Chair of the Board of Examiners owning the affected module, or appropriate nominee where there is a conflict of interest (acting as Chair).

Continuous extracted-text characters 17102–17244; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 144–144; characters 17102–17244; excerpt offset 0–142

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
2. At least two other members of staff from the Department not directly involved in the teaching of the affected module(s).

Continuous extracted-text characters 17249–17372; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 145–145; characters 17249–17372; excerpt offset 0–123

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
8. The quorum for the Investigatory Viva must be three including the Chair.

Continuous extracted-text characters 17375–17450; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 146–146; characters 17375–17450; excerpt offset 0–75

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
9. Where deemed necessary, a Departmental Representative who is competent to assess the student’s knowledge and understanding of the work or the allegation may be invited to attend in an advisory capacity. The Departmental Representative may, at the discretion of the Chair, ask the student questions, but will not be involved in the panel’s decision making.

Continuous extracted-text characters 17453–17811; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 147–147; characters 17453–17811; excerpt offset 0–358

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
10. A decision will be made by the Investigatory Viva after their private deliberations and decide one of the following outcomes:

Continuous extracted-text characters 17814–17943; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 148–148; characters 17814–17943; excerpt offset 0–129

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
1. No Further Action

Continuous extracted-text characters 17948–17968; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 149–149; characters 17948–17968; excerpt offset 0–20

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
2. To apply a penalty in line with Section 6 (where the allegation is Minor)

Continuous extracted-text characters 17973–18049; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 150–150; characters 17973–18049; excerpt offset 0–76

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
3. To refer to an Academic Misconduct Panel via Casework (where the Investigatory Viva is investigating a Major case)

Continuous extracted-text characters 18054–18171; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 151–151; characters 18054–18171; excerpt offset 0–117

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
11. The decision of the Investigatory Viva will be by majority vote, and in the case of a tie, the Chair of the Investigatory Viva will have the casting vote.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18174–18332; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 152–152; characters 18174–18332; excerpt offset 0–158

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
12. The Secretary should record the rationale for the decision and for any penalty applied.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18335–18426; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 153–153; characters 18335–18426; excerpt offset 0–91

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
13. The Secretary should inform the student of the Investigatory Viva decision within five working days and record this on the module minutes in Portico.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18429–18582; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 154–154; characters 18429–18582; excerpt offset 0–153

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
14. Students may appeal an Investigatory Viva penalty under Section 7: Stage 3 (Appeal Review).

Continuous extracted-text characters 18585–18680; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 155–155; characters 18585–18680; excerpt offset 0–95

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
15. For Major Cases being investigated at an Investigatory Viva, if prima facie evidence of lack of authorship is found to exist, the findings and all the relevant documentation must be forwarded to the Secretary of the Academic Misconduct Panel via the Casework Team for adjudication.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18683–18968; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 156–156; characters 18683–18968; excerpt offset 0–285

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
16. Where a student fails to attend a Viva, they may be referred to the Mandatory Faculty Interview process for a meeting with the Faculty. The purpose of the meeting is to outline the importance of engagement with the Academic Misconduct process. Following this meeting, the student will be sent a new date, time, and location of the rescheduled Viva. Alternatively, where the allegation is Minor and the student accepts the allegation, the Department may apply a penalty in line with Section 6.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18971–19467; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 157–157; characters 18971–19467; excerpt offset 0–496

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
17. Continued non-engagement with the Viva process may result in Suspension or Termination of Studies via the Mandatory Faculty Interview process.

Continuous extracted-text characters 19470–19616; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 158–158; characters 19470–19616; excerpt offset 0–146

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
5. A student’s attendance at an Investigatory Viva is mandatory and cannot be conducted in their absence. Failure to attend will result in the actions under section 5 paragraph 16 and 17 being taken.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16667–16866; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 141–141; characters 16667–16866; excerpt offset 0–199

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
6. An Investigatory Viva should be organised within 20 working days from the date of the Stage 1 outcome, unless there are reasonable circumstances that prevent this.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16869–17035; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 142–142; characters 16869–17035; excerpt offset 0–166

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
4. The Secretary must provide the student with the following at least five working days before the scheduled Investigatory Viva:

Continuous extracted-text characters 16292–16420; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 137–137; characters 16292–16420; excerpt offset 0–128

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
An Appeal Review is a paper-based review of the decision made at either Stage 1 or Stage 2. An appeal against an Academic Misconduct decision will only be heard if it is based on one or more of the following grounds:

Continuous extracted-text characters 26453–26669; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 210–210; characters 26453–26669; excerpt offset 0–216

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
1. The decision or panel process was not conducted in accordance with the procedures.

Continuous extracted-text characters 26674–26759; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 211–211; characters 26674–26759; excerpt offset 0–85

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
2. Fresh evidence has become available which was not available and could not reasonably be available for consideration during the decision or panel process.

Continuous extracted-text characters 26764–26920; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 212–212; characters 26764–26920; excerpt offset 0–156

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
3. The judgement of misconduct was not reasonable given the circumstances of the case.

Continuous extracted-text characters 26925–27011; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 213–213; characters 26925–27011; excerpt offset 0–86

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
4. The penalty will have a significant impact on the student given their specific circumstances (this applies to decisions that lead to non-progression or suspension/termination of studies).

Continuous extracted-text characters 27016–27206; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 214–214; characters 27016–27206; excerpt offset 0–190

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
##### Student Submission and Eligibility

Continuous extracted-text characters 27207–27247; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 215–215; characters 27207–27247; excerpt offset 0–40

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
2. Students must, within 10 working days of receiving formal notification of the decision, submit an appeal via the ‘UCL Student Academic Misconduct Procedure - Appeal Form†forms.office.com ’.

Continuous extracted-text characters 27250–27442; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 216–216; characters 27250–27442; excerpt offset 0–192

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
3. The Casework Team will conduct an eligibility review of the request. If it is determined that the request review does not fall within the grounds for review and/or does not meet the on-time criterion of 10 working days, the Casework Team will notify the student that the review request will not be taken forward. This means that a case will not progress to considerations at Stage 3 and a Completion of Procedures Letter will be issued.

Continuous extracted-text characters 27445–27884; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 217–217; characters 27445–27884; excerpt offset 0–439

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
##### Consideration of Appeal Review

Continuous extracted-text characters 27885–27921; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 218–218; characters 27885–27921; excerpt offset 0–36

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
4. If it is determined that the request review falls within the grounds for review, the case will be allocated to a member of the Casework Team, who is normally a Senior Casework Officer, for consideration.

Continuous extracted-text characters 27925–28131; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 220–220; characters 27925–28131; excerpt offset 0–206

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
5. The paper-based review will be considered on the basis of the student’s written statement and supporting evidence.

Continuous extracted-text characters 28134–28251; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 221–221; characters 28134–28251; excerpt offset 0–117

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
##### Appeal Review Outcome

Continuous extracted-text characters 28252–28279; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 222–222; characters 28252–28279; excerpt offset 0–27

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
6. Following the investigation, the Stage 3 Appeal Review may be upheld, partially upheld or not upheld. This decision will normally be issued within 20 working days of the student having been informed that the case is eligible for review.

Continuous extracted-text characters 28282–28521; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 223–223; characters 28282–28521; excerpt offset 0–239

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
7. If any aspect of the Stage 3 Appeal Review has been found upheld in full or in parts, then the outcome letter will make recommendations for what UCL will do to put things right. This decision may not be in line with the desired outcome as requested by the student. Recommendations by the Casework Team are subject to confirmation from the relevant Exam Board or equivalent academic body before implementation.

Continuous extracted-text characters 28524–28936; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 224–224; characters 28524–28936; excerpt offset 0–412

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
8. Where a review request is not upheld, then the outcome letter will explain how that decision has been reached.

Continuous extracted-text characters 28939–29052; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 225–225; characters 28939–29052; excerpt offset 0–113

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
9. If an appeal outcome leads to a necessary revision in a student’s certificate or transcript, the student must return any originals before updated versions can be issued.

Continuous extracted-text characters 29055–29227; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 226–226; characters 29055–29227; excerpt offset 0–172

Officiel universitetskilde ↗
10. The outcome of the Stage 3 Review will conclude UCL’s consideration of the case and will be confirmed in the form of a Completion of Procedures letter.

Continuous extracted-text characters 29230–29385; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 227–227; characters 29230–29385; excerpt offset 0–155

Officiel universitetskilde ↗

AI-værktøjer og adgang

  • Microsoft CopilotOfficiel anbefalingRegistreret som tilladt inden for kildens omfang

    Log ind med UCL-legitimationsoplysninger som beskrevet i den daterede officielle meddelelse. Aktuelle tenant-indstillinger og licenspriser blev ikke verificeret.

  • StudiosityOfficiel anbefalingRegistreret som tilladt inden for kildens omfang

    Adgang via UCL Moodle. Tilgængelig 24/7 med ubegrænset brug for nuværende UCL-studerende.

Opdateringer af posterSeneste 90 dage · Registrerede opdateringer: 2

Opdateringer af denne sides gennemgåede registrering, ikke en bekræftelse af, at universitetet har ændret sin politik.

  1. Sideopdatering

    Andre poster · Sideopdatering

    Vis revision

    Indlæser revision…

  2. Registreringstilføjelse · Rettelse af websted

    Akademisk integritet · Undervisning · 3 flere emner · Records involved: 14 (6 corrected / adjusted · 8 added)

    Vis revision

    Indlæser revision…

Gennemgåede påstande

14

Officielle kilder

11 officielle webadresser; 12 kildeangivelser og deres gemte versioner er bevaret.

A more secure generative AI tool is now available for staff and students

www.ucl.ac.uk

Officiel universitetskilde

UCL News

Hash og indfanget version

A more secure generative AI tool is now available for staff and students ·

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

225db72a7f327fd54b853d3dea0095f3e0655c09f0b40516f8921d5858d8336c

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Officiel kilde ↗

Generative AI Hub | Teaching & Learning - UCL

www.ucl.ac.uk

Officiel universitetskilde

UCL Arena Centre for Research-based Education

Hash og indfanget version

Generative AI Hub | Teaching & Learning - UCL ·

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

18a8d649f6ef529ede562cfe8f034500720b556a31107d5b5d82b5fd45ecb7d9

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Officiel kilde ↗

Generative AI and assessments | Students - UCL

www.ucl.ac.uk

Officiel universitetskilde

UCL Student Success Office

Hash og indfanget version

Generative AI and assessments | Students - UCL ·

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

aca9199e7db83a8e6bd3ba947c9bf2a1ceb2fbf8d752db06c157b7291173477b

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Officiel kilde ↗

Three categories of GenAI use in assessment | Teaching & Learning - UCL

www.ucl.ac.uk

Officiel universitetskilde

UCL Arena Centre for Research-based Education

Hash og indfanget version

Three categories of GenAI use in assessment | Teaching & Learning - UCL ·

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

5c0f82611cc2a15cc6f0666c7890c3fe12d2e8d6822cc772614846b71b82748e

Three categories of GenAI use in assessment · 2026-10-13T03:40:00.629405Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

e21955a74be27d67527c578ccfd0c3586a85fc7732cfd5c5341057bf4d6984e1

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Officiel kilde ↗

UCL Studiosity academic writing support

www.ucl.ac.uk

Officiel universitetskilde

Hash og indfanget version

UCL Studiosity academic writing support · 2026-10-13T03:40:00.484395Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

e74285262ee9af8b8658ebf829be84893f07a04b9d28909ab2b13ecec8f3d9aa

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Officiel kilde ↗

UCL Student Academic Misconduct Procedure

www.ucl.ac.uk

Officiel universitetskilde

Hash og indfanget version

UCL Student Academic Misconduct Procedure · 2026-10-13T03:40:00.535115Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Officiel kilde ↗

CLIE Policy on Student Use of Generative AI 2026–27

www.ucl.ac.uk

Officiel universitetskilde

Hash og indfanget version

CLIE Policy on Student Use of Generative AI 2026–27 · 2026-10-13T03:40:01.599636Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

6856bec84ba8b0a5a6fb11938c473841c4ef20c7d81e390fa185ef65f5f3072b

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Officiel kilde ↗

Acknowledging and referencing GenAI - References, citations and avoiding plagiarism - Library Skills

library-guides.ucl.ac.uk

Officiel universitetskilde

UCL Library Services

Hash og indfanget version

Acknowledging and referencing GenAI - References, citations and avoiding plagiarism - Library Skills ·

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

466868b9d731487b01a3aee5b446db1bb2b1650867cfdda876d12c8c2bfa9b93

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Officiel kilde ↗

UCL Press AI policy for book authors

uclpress.co.uk

Officiel universitetskilde

UCL Press

Hash og indfanget version

UCL Press AI policy for book authors ·

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

f712b332b51fc52f19199d1b5a7ad87fb07e15a60ac9fade66be53b9a8b36c3e

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Officiel kilde ↗

UCL Press Journals Editorial Policies

uclpress.co.uk

Officiel universitetskilde

UCL Press

Hash og indfanget version

UCL Press Journals Editorial Policies ·

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

3512c3c6e2292ab0d9df628f6ae43bc9b6516a8c6c75e0baad43cbc778280fdb

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Officiel kilde ↗

Transparency, authorship and generative AI in doctoral research

www.ucl.ac.uk

Officiel universitetskilde

Hash og indfanget version

Transparency, authorship and generative AI in doctoral research · 2026-10-13T03:40:00.410033Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

bb3df48b37cb0d363ce2f26f4798b3b71f44c27bd2aa885f6b02438f40232914

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Officiel kilde ↗
Postoplysninger, JSON og citering

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
v6-audit-fix-20261014
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

Published scoped record correction; current JSON and MCP use the same reviewed record, while the previous baseline is retained in history. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • Nuværende opbevaring, træning, licenspriser og kontraktdetaljer for Copilot-organisationen blev ikke verificeret; tidsfæstede udtalelser forbliver udtrykkeligt historiske.
  • To oprindelige generelle disciplinære anbringender holdes fortsat adskilt fra politikken for summativ bedømmelse.
  • enforcement:ucl:ucl-disciplinary-investigation-notice-deadline
  • enforcement:ucl:ucl-disciplinary-appeal-committee-format
      Current reviewed JSON
      Spørgsmål, som studerende stiller

      Spørgsmål, som studerende stiller

      Må jeg bruge AI til mit kursusarbejde?

      Følg bedømmelsesvejledningen. Kategori 1 udelukker GenAI under udførelsen; Kategori 2 tillader begrænset, kritisk assistance, mens den studerende forbliver forfatteren; Kategori 3 gør GenAI integreret. Kategorierne er vejledende. Sproglig støtte har undtagelser vedrørende bedømte færdigheder og substantielt indhold.

      Vis evidens →
      Skal jeg oplyse om brug af AI?

      Angivelse skal altid ske, når GenAI er blevet brugt som funktionelt værktøj til at hjælpe med at skabe akademisk arbejde (udkast, planlægning, strukturering). Minimumsangivelsen skal omfatte værktøjets navn og version, udgiver, URL og en enkelt sætning om sammenhængen. Hvor standardhenvisningsstile (APA, Chicago) eller afdelingernes retningslinjer kræver det, kan GenAI-værktøjet citeres som forfatter ud over den funktionelle angivelse.

      Vis evidens →
      Må jeg uploade følsomme data?

      Meddelelsen om Copilot fra marts 2024 beskriver databeskyttelse under UCL-login og opfordrer til forsigtighed; den verificerer ikke de aktuelle indstillinger for kontoopbevaring. Studerende skal overholde UCL's krav til databeskyttelse, når de bruger følsomme data; godkendelser eller samtykker kan være påkrævet.

      Vis evidens →
      Hvilke værktøjer har jeg adgang til?

      UCL anbefaler Copilot og Studiosity. Studiosity tilbyder 24/7 ubegrænset feedback på skrivning/kildehenvisning via Moodle og anfører, at studerendes arbejde ikke anvendes til at træne dets AI. Dets privatlivsmeddelelse omfatter opbevaret tjenesteindhold og oversøisk behandling. Adgang er ikke bedømmelsestilladelse.

      Vis evidens →
      Hvad er eksamensreglerne?

      Tilladelser til eksamen følger opgavebeskrivelsen. Eksamener, tests og mundtlige prøver, der afholdes fysisk, er eksempler på kategori 1, ikke en generel standard. CLIE-mundtlige vurderinger og vurderinger under tilsyn er kategori 1, medmindre andet er angivet. Individuelle undtagelser for hjælpemidler skal præciseres.

      Vis evidens →
      Hvilke regler gælder for forskning og publicering?

      Ph.d.-studerende oplyser om funktionelle eksterne bidrag, bevarer ansvaret og besvarer viva-spørgsmål uden AI-støtte. UCL Press har separate regler for bog-/tidsskriftforfatterskab, oplysningspligt og billeder; undtagelser for tidsskriftsmetodologi og forpligtelser for bog- versus tidsskriftsbedømmere adskiller sig.

      Vis evidens →
      Hvad udgør akademisk forseelse?

      Standard for utilbørlig fordel i henhold til Academic Manual Section 9; formel undersøgende viva ved mistanke om forfatterskabsovertrædelser.

      Vis evidens →
      Hvilken vejledning gælder for undervisning?

      Medarbejdere må ikke uploade studenterarbejde til AI-detektionsværktøjer eller GenAI-tjenester. Det frarådes at rette opgaver med GenAI.

      Vis evidens →
      Hvilke sikkerheds- og indkøbskrav gælder?

      Institutionelle Copilot-legitimationer og daterede beskyttelsespåstande er dokumenteret. Den aktuelle indkøbskontrakt og tenant-indstillinger er ikke verificeret.

      Vis evidens →
      Hvornår blev denne optegnelse kontrolleret?

      Registrering kontrolleret:

      Registreringsversion →
      Hvilke officielle kilder understøtter disse regler?Officiel kilde →
      Hvor kan jeg læse hele dokumentationen?

      14 · Fuldstændig politisk dokumentation

      Fuldstændig politisk dokumentation →