University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

University of Notre Dame

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Claims4Sources4
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Notre Dame currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

University of Notre Dame current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+8-0
11 # University of Notre Dame AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Notre Dame's student generative AI policy treats representing AI-generated or materially AI-modified work as one's own as academic dishonesty, and treats generative AI use that violates an instructor's stated policy or is not expressly permitted for coursework as an Honor Code violation.
3+Evidence (en, 976b444d8605): With this in mind, remember that representing work that you did not produce as your own, including work generated or materially modified by AI, constitutes academic dishonesty. Use of generative AI in a way that violates an instructor's articulated policy, or using it to complete coursework in a way not expressly permitted by the faculty member, will be considered a violation of the Honor Code.
4+privacy: Notre Dame's AI@ND guidance says faculty, students, and staff may use University information with generative AI tools only when the information is public or the AI tool or service has undergone appropriate internal review and protective contract terms are in place.
5+Evidence (en, 73bbc98d5465): Faculty, students, and staff may use University information with generative AI tools or services only when: The information is classified as public, or The AI tool or service being used has undergone appropriate internal reviews and contract terms are in place to protect university data assets.
6+privacy: Notre Dame guidance to faculty and staff says not to use AI tools with sensitive or confidential data and not to use AI tools with University data without a contract.
7+Evidence (en, 554813c9bafa): Data Sensitivity: Do not use AI tools with sensitive or confidential data. Collaboration: Work closely with our campus IT and data security teams when considering using AI tools. Do not use AI tools with University data without a contract.
8+teaching: Notre Dame guidance asks instructors to be explicit with students about expectations for ChatGPT and related AI tools in assignments, exams, and class, and says unauthorized generative AI use will be considered an Honor Code violation.
9+Evidence (en, 28a93f099abe): Be explicit with students about your expectations regarding the use of ChatGPT and related AI tools for assignments, exams, and in the classroom, and be clear that engaging in unauthorized use of generative AI will be considered a violation of the Honor Code.

Claim changes

4 claim records

privacy

Notre Dame guidance to faculty and staff says not to use AI tools with sensitive or confidential data and not to use AI tools with University data without a contract.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Notre Dame's AI@ND guidance says faculty, students, and staff may use University information with generative AI tools only when the information is public or the AI tool or service has undergone appropriate internal review and protective contract terms are in place.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Notre Dame guidance asks instructors to be explicit with students about expectations for ChatGPT and related AI tools in assignments, exams, and class, and says unauthorized generative AI use will be considered an Honor Code violation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Notre Dame's student generative AI policy treats representing AI-generated or materially AI-modified work as one's own as academic dishonesty, and treats generative AI use that violates an instructor's stated policy or is not expressly permitted for coursework as an Honor Code violation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

4 source attributions