Notre Dame, United States

University of Notre Dame

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage4 reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources4Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-notre-dame.json

Policy profile

Coverage score75/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence80%

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

Notre Dame's student generative AI policy treats representing AI-generated or materially AI-modified work as one's own as academic dishonesty, and treats generative AI use that violates an instructor's stated policy or is not expressly permitted for coursework as an Honor Code violation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: unauthorized_ai_use_honor_code_violation

Original evidence

Evidence 1
With this in mind, remember that representing work that you did not produce as your own, including work generated or materially modified by AI, constitutes academic dishonesty. Use of generative AI in a way that violates an instructor's articulated policy, or using it to complete coursework in a way not expressly permitted by the faculty member, will be considered a violation of the Honor Code.

Privacy

Notre Dame's AI@ND guidance says faculty, students, and staff may use University information with generative AI tools only when the information is public or the AI tool or service has undergone appropriate internal review and protective contract terms are in place.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: university_information_requires_public_or_reviewed_tool

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Faculty, students, and staff may use University information with generative AI tools or services only when: The information is classified as public, or The AI tool or service being used has undergone appropriate internal reviews and contract terms are in place to protect university data assets.

Privacy

Notre Dame guidance to faculty and staff says not to use AI tools with sensitive or confidential data and not to use AI tools with University data without a contract.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: no_sensitive_confidential_or_uncontracted_university_data_in_ai_tools

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Data Sensitivity: Do not use AI tools with sensitive or confidential data. Collaboration: Work closely with our campus IT and data security teams when considering using AI tools. Do not use AI tools with University data without a contract.

Teaching

Notre Dame guidance asks instructors to be explicit with students about expectations for ChatGPT and related AI tools in assignments, exams, and class, and says unauthorized generative AI use will be considered an Honor Code violation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: instructors_should_state_ai_expectations

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Be explicit with students about your expectations regarding the use of ChatGPT and related AI tools for assignments, exams, and in the classroom, and be clear that engaging in unauthorized use of generative AI will be considered a violation of the Honor Code.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

4 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities