Policy presence
University of Notre Dame has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Notre Dame, United States
University of Notre Dame has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
University of Notre Dame has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Notre Dame has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
University of Notre Dame has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Notre Dame has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
University of Notre Dame has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Notre Dame has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: unauthorized_ai_use_honor_code_violation
Original evidence
Evidence 1With this in mind, remember that representing work that you did not produce as your own, including work generated or materially modified by AI, constitutes academic dishonesty. Use of generative AI in a way that violates an instructor's articulated policy, or using it to complete coursework in a way not expressly permitted by the faculty member, will be considered a violation of the Honor Code.
Privacy
Normalized value: university_information_requires_public_or_reviewed_tool
Original evidence
Evidence 1Faculty, students, and staff may use University information with generative AI tools or services only when: The information is classified as public, or The AI tool or service being used has undergone appropriate internal reviews and contract terms are in place to protect university data assets.
Privacy
Normalized value: no_sensitive_confidential_or_uncontracted_university_data_in_ai_tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1Data Sensitivity: Do not use AI tools with sensitive or confidential data. Collaboration: Work closely with our campus IT and data security teams when considering using AI tools. Do not use AI tools with University data without a contract.
Teaching
Normalized value: instructors_should_state_ai_expectations
Original evidence
Evidence 1Be explicit with students about your expectations regarding the use of ChatGPT and related AI tools for assignments, exams, and in the classroom, and be clear that engaging in unauthorized use of generative AI will be considered a violation of the Honor Code.
0 machine or needs-review claim
4 source attribution
honorcode.nd.edu
honorcode.nd.edu
ai.nd.edu
ai.nd.edu