privacy
Notre Dame guidance to faculty and staff says not to use AI tools with sensitive or confidential data and not to use AI tools with University data without a contract.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
University of Notre Dame
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
University of Notre Dame currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for University of Notre Dame. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
University of Notre Dame combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+8-0
11 # University of Notre Dame AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Notre Dame's student generative AI policy treats representing AI-generated or materially AI-modified work as one's own as academic dishonesty, and treats generative AI use that violates an instructor's stated policy or is not expressly permitted for coursework as an Honor Code violation.
3+Evidence (en, 976b444d8605): With this in mind, remember that representing work that you did not produce as your own, including work generated or materially modified by AI, constitutes academic dishonesty. Use of generative AI in a way that violates an instructor's articulated policy, or using it to complete coursework in a way not expressly permitted by the faculty member, will be considered a violation of the Honor Code.
4+privacy: Notre Dame's AI@ND guidance says faculty, students, and staff may use University information with generative AI tools only when the information is public or the AI tool or service has undergone appropriate internal review and protective contract terms are in place.
5+Evidence (en, 73bbc98d5465): Faculty, students, and staff may use University information with generative AI tools or services only when: The information is classified as public, or The AI tool or service being used has undergone appropriate internal reviews and contract terms are in place to protect university data assets.
6+privacy: Notre Dame guidance to faculty and staff says not to use AI tools with sensitive or confidential data and not to use AI tools with University data without a contract.
7+Evidence (en, 554813c9bafa): Data Sensitivity: Do not use AI tools with sensitive or confidential data. Collaboration: Work closely with our campus IT and data security teams when considering using AI tools. Do not use AI tools with University data without a contract.
8+teaching: Notre Dame guidance asks instructors to be explicit with students about expectations for ChatGPT and related AI tools in assignments, exams, and class, and says unauthorized generative AI use will be considered an Honor Code violation.
9+Evidence (en, 28a93f099abe): Be explicit with students about your expectations regarding the use of ChatGPT and related AI tools for assignments, exams, and in the classroom, and be clear that engaging in unauthorized use of generative AI will be considered a violation of the Honor Code.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
4 claim records
privacy
Notre Dame's AI@ND guidance says faculty, students, and staff may use University information with generative AI tools only when the information is public or the AI tool or service has undergone appropriate internal review and protective contract terms are in place.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Notre Dame guidance asks instructors to be explicit with students about expectations for ChatGPT and related AI tools in assignments, exams, and class, and says unauthorized generative AI use will be considered an Honor Code violation.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Notre Dame's student generative AI policy treats representing AI-generated or materially AI-modified work as one's own as academic dishonesty, and treats generative AI use that violates an instructor's stated policy or is not expressly permitted for coursework as an Honor Code violation.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
AI Recommendations for Instructors
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 5:02 AM
Generative AI Policy for Students
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 5:02 AM
Guidance on use of AI tools at Notre Dame
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 5:02 AM
Policies and Guidelines
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 5:02 AM