Change log

Ulster University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Ulster University currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 17, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Ulster University current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+8-0
11 # Ulster University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Ulster University's Student Guide identifies inappropriate use of generative AI tools as academic misconduct when the tools are deployed for assessment without authorisation or beyond what assessment instructions permit.
3+Evidence (en, b39c79026b28): Inappropriate use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools: Generative AI tools deployed for assessment purposes without authorisation or beyond that permitted in the assessment instructions.
4+privacy: Ulster University's student guidance tells students to be very careful about what they upload to GenAI tools and says never to input personal information, confidential or sensitive data, placement, patient or client scenarios, draft assignments or reflective work, unpublished research data, or copyrighted material.
5+Evidence (en, bb3dbeaac6e1): When using GenAI tools, be very careful about what you upload or share. Never input: Personal information (yours or others'); Confidential or sensitive data; Placement, patient, or client scenarios; Draft assignments or reflective work; Unpublished research data; Copyrighted material.
6+ai_tool_treatment: Ulster University's student guidance says the University does not ban generative AI tools, but students who use them are expected to do so thoughtfully, transparently, and in line with module requirements.
7+Evidence (en, bb3dbeaac6e1): You are not required to use GenAI to succeed at Ulster. If you choose to use it, you are expected to do so thoughtfully, transparently, and in line with your module requirements. The University does not ban Generative AI tools.
8+teaching: Ulster University's staff guidance says its GenAI advice applies to all taught modules and forms of assessed or submitted work across the university, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education programmes.
9+Evidence (en, 205a4cf09516): This advice applies to all taught modules and forms of assessed or submitted work across the university, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education programmes.

Claim changes

4 claim records

privacy

Ulster University's student guidance tells students to be very careful about what they upload to GenAI tools and says never to input personal information, confidential or sensitive data, placement, patient or client scenarios, draft assignments or reflective work, unpublished research data, or copyrighted material.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Ulster University's staff guidance says its GenAI advice applies to all taught modules and forms of assessed or submitted work across the university, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education programmes.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Ulster University's Student Guide identifies inappropriate use of generative AI tools as academic misconduct when the tools are deployed for assessment without authorisation or beyond what assessment instructions permit.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

Ulster University's student guidance says the University does not ban generative AI tools, but students who use them are expected to do so thoughtfully, transparently, and in line with module requirements.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

4 source attributions