Policy presence
Ulster University has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Belfast, United Kingdom
Ulster University
Ulster University has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 4 reviewed claims. Last checked May 17, 2026.
Ulster University AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Ulster University has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions, including 4 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 17, 2026. Discovery context: Ulster University is listed as QS 2026 rank =609.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Ulster University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 17, 2026 and last changed on May 17, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/ulster-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
Ulster University has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Ulster University has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Privacy and data entry
Ulster University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Ulster University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Approved tools
Ulster University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Named AI services
Ulster University has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Ulster University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Ulster University has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Ulster University's Student Guide identifies inappropriate use of generative AI tools as academic misconduct when the tools are deployed for assessment without authorisation or beyond what assessment instructions permit.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: unauthorized_or_beyond_instructions_genai_assessment_use_is_academic_misconduct
Original evidence
Evidence 1Inappropriate use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools: Generative AI tools deployed for assessment purposes without authorisation or beyond that permitted in the assessment instructions.
Localized display only
The Student Guide lists unauthorised or beyond-instructions GenAI use for assessment as inappropriate AI use.
Privacy
Ulster University's student guidance tells students to be very careful about what they upload to GenAI tools and says never to input personal information, confidential or sensitive data, placement, patient or client scenarios, draft assignments or reflective work, unpublished research data, or copyrighted material.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students_warned_not_to_input_personal_confidential_sensitive_assignment_research_or_copyrighted_material
Original evidence
Evidence 1When using GenAI tools, be very careful about what you upload or share. Never input: Personal information (yours or others'); Confidential or sensitive data; Placement, patient, or client scenarios; Draft assignments or reflective work; Unpublished research data; Copyrighted material.
Localized display only
The student guidance cautions students not to input personal, confidential, sensitive, placement, patient/client, draft assignment, research, or copyrighted material into GenAI tools.
Ai Tool Treatment
Ulster University's student guidance says the University does not ban generative AI tools, but students who use them are expected to do so thoughtfully, transparently, and in line with module requirements.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_not_banned_but_transparent_module_aligned_use_expected
Original evidence
Evidence 1You are not required to use GenAI to succeed at Ulster. If you choose to use it, you are expected to do so thoughtfully, transparently, and in line with your module requirements. The University does not ban Generative AI tools.
Localized display only
Ulster does not ban GenAI tools, but student use is expected to be transparent and aligned with module requirements.
Teaching
Ulster University's staff guidance says its GenAI advice applies to all taught modules and forms of assessed or submitted work across the university, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education programmes.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_staff_advice_applies_to_all_taught_modules_and_assessed_work
Original evidence
Evidence 1This advice applies to all taught modules and forms of assessed or submitted work across the university, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education programmes.
Localized display only
The staff guidance says the advice applies across taught modules and assessed or submitted work.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
Academic Misconduct
ulster.ac.uk
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAi)
ulster.ac.uk
Guidance on use of AI for Staff
ulster.ac.uk
Guidance on use of AI for students
ulster.ac.uk
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.