Belfast, United Kingdom

Ulster University

Student guide · Task scope and procedure

Check the module; disclose use and protect drafts.

Ulster’s student guide permits some learning assistance conditionally, requires disclosure and gives a strict upload list including draft assignments. The public Panel summary is distinct from the blocked formal PDF.

A complete student policy summary is not available yet; see the collected claims and sources.

Scope and transition details

Ulster’s student guide permits some learning assistance conditionally, requires disclosure and gives a strict upload list including draft assignments. The public Panel summary is distinct from the blocked formal PDF.

Check the module; disclose use and protect drafts. hero illustration; exact scope and conditions are in the adjacent source-linked text.
Check the rule for your school and assignment.

What happens if AI use raises a concern?

Supplement collected: 2026-10-08 · Current applicability not independently confirmed

Compare published university record ↗

When a concern arises

AI-specific sourceOfficial guidanceModality: Informational

Site interpretation

Ulster does not ban GenAI university-wide and students are not required to use it. Assessed work must reflect their own understanding and follow module requirements. Uncertainty should be checked with the module coordinator or studies adviser before assessed use.

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

View original text and conditions

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university

You are not required to use GenAI to succeed at Ulster. If you choose to use it, you are expected to do so thoughtfully, transparently, and in line with your module requirements. What is Generative AI? Generative AI tools can produce new content, (such as text, images, audio, video, or computer code), in response to prompts you provide. Many of these tools are now built into familiar software, such as web browsers or document editors. These tools can support learning, but they do not replace your understanding, critical thinking, or academic judgement. You are always responsible for the work you submit. Ulster’s approach The University does not ban Generative AI tools. Instead, we aim to: Uphold academic integrity Protect you from misuse, over-reliance, and data risks Support AI literacy for students and staff Encourage ethical, transparent, and reasonable use Your assessed work must always reflect your own learning and understanding, even if tools are used in limited ways. New to Generative AI? Start here If you are unsure where to begin, talk to your module coordinator or studies adviser, don't make assumptions. keep your use of GenAI low-risk and focused on learning rather than assessed outputs. A useful question to ask yourself is: Is this helping me think: or is it replacing my thinking? What GenAI can help with and where to be careful Remember that all use of GenAi must be disclosed
View official source ↗

Collected: 2026-10-08 · 67–83
SHA-256: 1201df1eececdc64bebaf26bb261450803644ada3e32ac2e85b6012aa6110f92

AI-specific sourceOfficial guidanceModality: Obligation

Site interpretation

The guide requires disclosure of all GenAI use. Its generally acceptable learning uses remain conditional on module rules; assessed answers, reflective work, lab reports, generated citations and presenting AI content as one’s own are generally unacceptable unless explicitly permitted.

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

View original text and conditions

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university

Remember that all use of GenAi must be disclosed Generally acceptable uses (unless your module says otherwise): Developing your ideas Planning the structure of an assignment Clarifying difficult concepts Generating practice questions Revising your own written work Writing assistance, (e.g.) streamlining word counts and improving grammar Use with caution: Summarising academic sources (you must verify accuracy) Generating examples (you must adapt and contextualise them) Outlining arguments (you must develop and justify them yourself) Creating examples or drafts that you heavily edit Generally not acceptable unless explicitly permitted: Writing assessed coursework answers Generating reflective writing, portfolios, or lab reports Producing references or citations Submitting AI-generated content as your own work If in doubt : ask
View official source ↗

Collected: 2026-10-08 · 83–101
SHA-256: 1201df1eececdc64bebaf26bb261450803644ada3e32ac2e85b6012aa6110f92

AI-specific sourceOfficial guidanceModality: Obligation

Site interpretation

Permitted GenAI use must be clearly acknowledged. The quoted coursework declaration also forbids uploading work before, during or after submission to unapproved plagiarism detectors or answer-sharing platforms. Acknowledging permitted use does not automatically produce a penalty.

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

View original text and conditions

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university

If Generative AI is used without being acknowledged, this may be treated as academic misconduct. Before starting assessed work, always be clear whether GenAI use is allowed, restricted, or not appropriate for that assessment. Acknowledging the use of GenAI If you are permitted to use Generative AI for academic purposes, you must acknowledge it clearly. The Student Academic Misconduct Procedure explicitly discusses the use of AI, and the student declaration for coursework submission states that: “I declare that this is all my own work. Any material I have referred to has been accurately referenced and any contribution of Artificial Intelligence technology has been fully acknowledged. I understand the importance of academic integrity and have read and understood the University’s General Regulation: Student Academic Integrity and the Academic Misconduct Procedure. I understand that I must not upload my work before, during or after submission to any unapproved plagiarism detectors or answer sharing platforms, or equivalent, and that only University-approved platforms should be used.” Citing AI Generative Tools in the Ulster Harvard Referencing style for LHS Citing AI Generative Tools in the Ulster Harvard Referencing style for CEBE, AHSS and UUBS Acknowledging use does not automatically lead to penalty. Failing to acknowledge use is the real risk
View official source ↗

Collected: 2026-10-08 · 116–124
SHA-256: 1201df1eececdc64bebaf26bb261450803644ada3e32ac2e85b6012aa6110f92

AI-specific sourceOfficial guidanceModality: Prohibition

Site interpretation

The student guide says never input personal information, sensitive or confidential data, placement/patient/client scenarios, draft assignments or reflective work, unpublished research data or copyrighted material. This strict upload list is retained separately from examples of permitted learning assistance.

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

View original text and conditions

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university

Protecting your data and privacy When using GenAI tools, be very careful about what you upload or share. Never input: Personal information (yours or others’) Confidential or sensitive data Placement, patient, or client scenarios Draft assignments or reflective work Unpublished research data Copyrighted material Information entered into AI tools may be stored, reused, or shared by service providers. If in doubt, do not upload it.
View official source ↗

Collected: 2026-10-08 · 125–135
SHA-256: 1201df1eececdc64bebaf26bb261450803644ada3e32ac2e85b6012aa6110f92

How you can respond

AI-specific sourceOfficial guidanceModality: Informational

Site interpretation

Ulster Library’s tool comparison tells readers to sign into Copilot with their University account. Its listed writing capabilities do not override the student guide’s restrictions or establish actual account activation; other tools in the comparison are not treated as institutional licences.

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

View original text and conditions

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university

Copilot Sign in using your university account. Can rephrase your content and recommend structure for your essay. Suggests different vocabularies. Alternates your writing style. https://copilot.cloud.microsoft/
View official source ↗

Collected: 2026-10-08 · 97–100
SHA-256: cf1ee7b3a8a5fdabb3f6d4ffd7371334942e97c21473a5ae92a4d76ff7ed2db7

Source guidanceOfficial guidanceModality: Informational

Site interpretation

The public misconduct page distinguishes staff observations and similarity checking. Suspected students are normally invited to a School or Faculty Panel and may bring another University-community member. Outcome notification is normally within ten working days of the Panel decision; this is a University notification period, not a student appeal deadline.

University notifies Panel outcome · 10 working days

Institution · normally

Within the stated period. Check the source summary and original text for the starting point, scope and exceptions.

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

View original text and conditions

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university

Lecturers are very familiar with marking and standardising the work that comprises their modules, and they become familiar with a student’s work and can often spot changes in a student’s writing style, tone, font, format, and level of complexity. Lecturers will also be able to see where there are unexplained similarities between their work and that of other students, as well as missing or inaccurate references, different referencing conventions, and other inconsistencies. Plagiarism detection software The University uses plagiarism detection software, which can be a useful tool in highlighting similarities between the submitted work and the work of other students, researchers and authors. What happens if you are suspected of breaching academic integrity standards If you are suspected of academic misconduct, you should contact the Students’ Union Advice Bureau and/or the Student Wellbeing team for support. In most cases, academic misconduct may initially be suspected by the marker of the work being assessed or reviewed, although there are instances where reports are made through other channels such as directly to the Student Academic Affairs Team. Where there is a suspicion that academic misconduct has taken place, the University will take action in line with the Student Academic Misconduct Procedure. You can access the Procedure here. In most cases of suspected academic misconduct, you will be invited to meet with a School or Faculty Academic Misconduct Panel to enable them to carry out an investigation. You can choose to be accompanied to this meeting by another member of the University community. The Panel will subsequently make a decision on whether academic misconduct has occurred and will determine the appropriate action or penalty. You will normally be informed of the outcome within ten working days of the Panel’s decision being made.
View official source ↗

Collected: 2026-10-08 · 222–229
SHA-256: b39b3e7d491e39a14e28b55aca2894de78c8793c8a6265f039467e2734f950d9

Possible outcomes

Source guidanceOfficial guidanceModality: Informational

Site interpretation

The public page describes outcomes from advice and warning through capped or zero marks to suspension or expulsion for serious cases. Regulated programmes may also involve Fitness to Practise. Students’ Union advice and wellbeing support are available; no automatic AI penalty or dedicated accommodation procedure is established here.

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

View original text and conditions

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university

Penalties for breaching academic integrity standards If you have been found to have breached academic integrity standards, the outcomes range from advice and guidance through a range of penalties which may include a written warning, capping your marks, receiving a mark of zero, and in the most serious cases, suspension or expulsion. Finally, if your course is what is known as a ‘regulated’ course under a Professional, Statutory, or Regulatory Body, the consequences of academic misconduct can be even more severe. In such cases, academic misconduct may result in a Fitness to Practise investigation, which again can have serious and significant consequences. It is important that you are aware of the impact that academic misconduct can have on your University career, potential qualification and classification, and your future. Support Available We want you to succeed at Ulster. Committing academic misconduct is never a good idea. If you are struggling academically, please reach out to your course team for support. If you do not understand how to reference correctly, or if you need help with planning your study schedule, please link in with our Student Success Centre. If you are experiencing difficult personal circumstances which are affecting your ability to study, you should reach out to your course team and/or the Student Wellbeing Team. You can also have a look at other support available including support available for mental and physical health in your local area. Advice and guidance is also available from the Student’s Union Advice Bureau. If you would like to discuss the Academic Misconduct Procedure further, please get in touch with the Student Academic Affairs Team (saat@ulster.ac.uk).
View official source ↗

Collected: 2026-10-08 · 230–240
SHA-256: b39b3e7d491e39a14e28b55aca2894de78c8793c8a6265f039467e2734f950d9

Collection & version notes

Published source-based additions. English summaries and original-language quotations are shown separately from the reviewed record. These are possible processes and outcomes, not automatic penalties for AI use. Present applicability has not been independently confirmed; check the source scope and version.

Source-text comparison; not an official translation

Hashes allow comparison of saved content; they do not certify current validity or immutability. These topics are not a mandatory sequence.

AI tools & access

Tool access is not permission to use AI in an assessment. Check your assignment rules, eligible users and data restrictions.

Archived tool record; consult the official source for current access.

  • Microsoft CopilotInstitutional access / licenceRecorded as allowed in the source scope
    Access, conditions & official evidence

    Ulster University Library directs users to Microsoft Copilot using their university account.

    Open Copilot and sign in using an Ulster University account.

    No additional user charge is stated.

    Source 1 ↗

    Original quotation

    Copilot
    Source 2 ↗

    Original quotation

    Sign in using your university account.

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

5 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity1 reviewed claim

Academic Integrity

Ulster University's Student Guide identifies inappropriate use of generative AI tools as academic misconduct when the tools are deployed for assessment without authorisation or beyond what assessment instructions permit.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: unauthorized_or_beyond_instructions_genai_assessment_use_is_academic_misconduct

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Inappropriate use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools: Generative AI tools deployed for assessment purposes without authorisation or beyond that permitted in the assessment instructions.

Localized display only

The Student Guide lists unauthorised or beyond-instructions GenAI use for assessment as inappropriate AI use.

Teaching1 reviewed claim

Teaching

Ulster University's staff guidance says its GenAI advice applies to all taught modules and forms of assessed or submitted work across the university, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education programmes.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: genai_staff_advice_applies_to_all_taught_modules_and_assessed_work

Original evidence

Evidence 1
This advice applies to all taught modules and forms of assessed or submitted work across the university, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education programmes.

Localized display only

The staff guidance says the advice applies across taught modules and assessed or submitted work.

Privacy1 reviewed claim

Privacy

Ulster University's student guidance tells students to be very careful about what they upload to GenAI tools and says never to input personal information, confidential or sensitive data, placement, patient or client scenarios, draft assignments or reflective work, unpublished research data, or copyrighted material.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: students_warned_not_to_input_personal_confidential_sensitive_assignment_research_or_copyrighted_material

Original evidence

Evidence 1
When using GenAI tools, be very careful about what you upload or share. Never input: Personal information (yours or others'); Confidential or sensitive data; Placement, patient, or client scenarios; Draft assignments or reflective work; Unpublished research data; Copyrighted material.

Localized display only

The student guidance cautions students not to input personal, confidential, sensitive, placement, patient/client, draft assignment, research, or copyrighted material into GenAI tools.

Ai Tool Treatment2 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Ulster University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"Ulster University Library directs users to Microsoft Copilot using their university account.","howToObtain":"Open Copilot and sign in using an Ulster University account.","costToUser":"No additional user charge is stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Copilot

Localized display only

Copilot

Original evidence

Evidence 2
Sign in using your university account.

Localized display only

Sign in using your university account.

Ai Tool Treatment

Ulster University's student guidance says the University does not ban generative AI tools, but students who use them are expected to do so thoughtfully, transparently, and in line with module requirements.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: genai_not_banned_but_transparent_module_aligned_use_expected

Original evidence

Evidence 1
You are not required to use GenAI to succeed at Ulster. If you choose to use it, you are expected to do so thoughtfully, transparently, and in line with your module requirements. The University does not ban Generative AI tools.

Localized display only

Ulster does not ban GenAI tools, but student use is expected to be transparent and aligned with module requirements.

Source record

Official sources

5 sources

Open official source list
Record information, JSON & citation
ReviewAI-assisted reviewConfidence97%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Ulster University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/ulster-university

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log

Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.