University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

City St George’s, University of London

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Claims3Sources3
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

City St George’s, University of London currently has 3 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

City St George’s, University of London current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+6-0
11 # City St George’s, University of London AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: City St George's tells students that using generative AI to gain an unfair advantage by misrepresenting its work as their own is academic misconduct.
3+Evidence (en, 07281ac8ab11): Using Generative AI to gain an unfair advantage by misrepresenting its work as your own is Academic Misconduct and can have serious consequences.
4+ai_tool_treatment: City St George's states that, for assessment, its default position is that students must not use generative AI tools unless instructed to do so by a module tutor or programme director.
5+Evidence (en, 7c1548317407): When it comes to using AI as part of an assessment, the University’s default position is that you must not use generative AI tools for assessment, unless you have been instructed to do so by your module tutor or programme director.
6+privacy: City St George's provides Microsoft Copilot Chat free for students and recommends logging in with University credentials for data security, while warning students not to enter personal, sensitive, confidential, or copyrighted material into generative AI tools.
7+Evidence (en, 7c1548317407): City St George’s provides Microsoft Copilot Chat free for all students and you are recommended to use this tool: ... Ensure you log in with your University credentials to keep your data secure. ... you should not enter personal, sensitive or confidential information nor submit copyrighted materials into the tool.

Claim changes

3 claim records

privacy

City St George's provides Microsoft Copilot Chat free for students and recommends logging in with University credentials for data security, while warning students not to enter personal, sensitive, confidential, or copyrighted material into generative AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

City St George's tells students that using generative AI to gain an unfair advantage by misrepresenting its work as their own is academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

City St George's states that, for assessment, its default position is that students must not use generative AI tools unless instructed to do so by a module tutor or programme director.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

3 source attributions