London, United Kingdom

City St George’s, University of London

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage3 reviewedEvidence-backed claims3Reviewed3Candidate0Official sources3Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/city-st-georges-university-of-london.json

Policy profile

Coverage score60/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence79%

Policy presence

No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

City St George’s, University of London has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence76%Evidence1Sources1

Academic integrity

City St George’s, University of London has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

City St George’s, University of London has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records1

AI tools

City St George’s, University of London

Tool
AI tools
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Blocked / restricted
Review
Agent reviewed

Evidence-backed claims

3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

City St George's tells students that using generative AI to gain an unfair advantage by misrepresenting its work as their own is academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: misrepresenting_generative_ai_work_as_own_is_misconduct

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Using Generative AI to gain an unfair advantage by misrepresenting its work as your own is Academic Misconduct and can have serious consequences.

Ai Tool Treatment

City St George's states that, for assessment, its default position is that students must not use generative AI tools unless instructed to do so by a module tutor or programme director.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: assessment_ai_use_default_not_permitted_unless_instructed

Original evidence

Evidence 1
When it comes to using AI as part of an assessment, the University’s default position is that you must not use generative AI tools for assessment, unless you have been instructed to do so by your module tutor or programme director.

Privacy

City St George's provides Microsoft Copilot Chat free for students and recommends logging in with University credentials for data security, while warning students not to enter personal, sensitive, confidential, or copyrighted material into generative AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%

Normalized value: copilot_available_university_login_privacy_warning

Original evidence

Evidence 1
City St George’s provides Microsoft Copilot Chat free for all students and you are recommended to use this tool: ... Ensure you log in with your University credentials to keep your data secure. ... you should not enter personal, sensitive or confidential information nor submit copyrighted materials into the tool.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities