Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
London, United Kingdom
City St George’s, University of London
City St George’s, University of London is listed as QS 2026 rank =310. City St George’s, University of London has 3 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
City St George’s, University of London is listed as QS 2026 rank =310. City St George’s, University of London has 3 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists City St George’s, University of London as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 3 source-backed claims, including 3 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/city-st-georges-university-of-london.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: Microsoft Copilot.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
City St George’s, University of London has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
City St George’s, University of London has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
City St George’s, University of London has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
City St George’s, University of London has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
City St George’s, University of London has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
City St George’s, University of London has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
City St George's tells students that using generative AI to gain an unfair advantage by misrepresenting its work as their own is academic misconduct.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: misrepresenting_generative_ai_work_as_own_is_misconduct
Original evidence
Evidence 1Using Generative AI to gain an unfair advantage by misrepresenting its work as your own is Academic Misconduct and can have serious consequences.
Ai Tool Treatment
City St George's states that, for assessment, its default position is that students must not use generative AI tools unless instructed to do so by a module tutor or programme director.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: assessment_ai_use_default_not_permitted_unless_instructed
Original evidence
Evidence 1When it comes to using AI as part of an assessment, the University’s default position is that you must not use generative AI tools for assessment, unless you have been instructed to do so by your module tutor or programme director.
Privacy
City St George's provides Microsoft Copilot Chat free for students and recommends logging in with University credentials for data security, while warning students not to enter personal, sensitive, confidential, or copyrighted material into generative AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: copilot_available_university_login_privacy_warning
Original evidence
Evidence 1City St George’s provides Microsoft Copilot Chat free for all students and you are recommended to use this tool: ... Ensure you log in with your University credentials to keep your data secure. ... you should not enter personal, sensitive or confidential information nor submit copyrighted materials into the tool.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
Academic Integrity & Misconduct Policy
citystgeorges.ac.uk
Academic Integrity and Misconduct | Student Hub | City St George's, University of London
studenthub.citystgeorges.ac.uk
Using generative artificial intelligence (AI) for learning | Student Hub | City St George's, University of London
studenthub.citystgeorges.ac.uk
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.